Bijective matrix algebra
The key point is to show that h0 is a bijection mapping Fxd(h) onto B. It is maps combinatorial matrices to ordinary matrices. If B = (Bij ) is another ...
Math 217: §2.4 Invertible linear maps and matrices Professor Karen
The image of φ is the set {y ∈ Y
Math 4377/6308 Advanced Linear Algebra - 2.2 Properties of Linear
2.2 Properties of Linear Transformations Matrices. Null Spaces and Ranges. Injective
Linear bijective maps preserving fixed values of products of matrices
For a fixed integer n ! 2 let Mn be the algebra of all nВn matrices over the complex field C. Let x1
LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS Corresponding material in the book
Note that our earlier discussion of injective surjective and bijective was in the context of a “meta” map from a set of matrices to a set of linear
Learning Bijective Feature Maps for Linear ICA
19 февр. 2020 г. their lack of bijective mapping that preprocesses data. Simi- larly ... function (such as a matrix mapping followed by an activation function) is.
Huas fundamental theorem of the geometry of matrices
In [20] injective continuous maps on real or complex matrices preserving adjacency in one Automorphisms of posets are bijective maps preserving the order in ...
Linear mappings preserving square-zero matrices
Let sln denote the set of all n x n complex matrices with trace zero. Suppose that 4> : sln. —* sln is a bijective linear mapping preserving square-zero
Learning Bijective Feature Maps for Linear ICA
The canonical problem is blind source separation; the aim is to estimate the original sources of a mixed set of signals by learning an unmixing matrix which
Non-linear commutativity preserving maps on hermitian matrices
trices and let φ : Hn → Hn be a bijective map. Then φ preserves commutativity in both directions if and only if there exists a unitary n × n matrix U and for.
Maps on matrix spaces
27 avr. 2005 survey. 2. Multiplicative maps on matrix algebras. We started with the description of all bijective linear multiplicative maps on Mn(F).
LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS Corresponding material in the book
a unique matrix i.e.
Math 217: §2.4 Invertible linear maps and matrices Professor Karen
If it is invertible give the inverse map. 1. The linear mapping R3 ? R3 which scales every vector by 2. Solution note: This is surjective
ZERO PRODUCT PRESERVING MAPS ON MATRIX RINGS OVER
Banach space then every bijective map on B(X) preserving zero products in both directions is a product of a bijective kernel-image preserving map and a
On the Affine Equivalence and Nonlinearity Preserving Bijective
automorphism group of Sylvester Hadamard matrices. Then we show that new nonlinearity preserving non-affine bijective mappings also ex-.
INJECTIVE SURJECTIVE AND INVERTIBLE Surjectivity: Maps
The map. (1 4 -2. 3 12 -6. ) is not surjective. Let's understand the difference between these two examples: General Fact. Let A be a matrix and let Ared be
Math 4377/6308 Advanced Linear Algebra - 2.2 Properties of Linear
Injective Surjective
Inverses of Square Matrices
26 févr. 2018 Bijective functions always have both left and right inverses and are thus said to be invertible. A function which fails to be either injective ...
Non-linear commutativity preserving maps on hermitian matrices
trices and let ? : Hn ? Hn be a bijective map. Then ? preserves commutativity in both directions if and only if there exists a unitary n × n matrix U and
Learning Bijective Feature Maps for Linear ICA
The canonical problem is blind source separation; the aim is to estimate the original sources of a mixed set of signals by learning an unmixing matrix which
[PDF] Bijective matrix algebra - CORE
We define a matrix (A) by setting (A)ij = (Aij ) so that maps combinatorial matrices to ordinary matrices If B = (Bij ) is another combinatorial matrix of
[PDF] Linear transformations - Vipul Naik
Every linear transformation arises from a unique matrix i e there is a bijection between the set of n × m matrices and the set of linear transformations from
[PDF] injective surjective and invertible - The UM Math Department
INJECTIVE SURJECTIVE AND INVERTIBLE DAVID SPEYER Surjectivity: Maps which hit every value in the target space Let's start with a puzzle
[PDF] Linear Algebra
Bijective matrices are also called invertible matrices because they are characterized by the existence of a unique square matrix B (the inverse of A denoted
[PDF] BIJECTIVE PROOF PROBLEMS
18 août 2009 · To prove an inequality a ? b combinatorially find sets A B with #A = a #B = b and either an injection (one-to-one map) f : A ? B or a
Bijective proofs using two-line matrix representations for partitions
19 nov 2022 · PDF In this paper we present bijective proofs of several identities involving partitions by making use of a new way for representing
[PDF] 22 Properties of Linear Transformations Matrices
Injective Surjective and Bijective Dimension Theorem Nullity and Rank Linear Map and Values on Basis Coordinate Vectors Matrix Representations
[PDF] 1 InJECtiVE And sURJECtiVE FUnCtions
18 nov 2016 · A function f from a set X to a set Y is injective (also called This is really a basis as if we put them into a matrix and take the
Maps on matrix spaces - ScienceDirectcom
27 avr 2005 · survey 2 Multiplicative maps on matrix algebras We started with the description of all bijective linear multiplicative maps on Mn(F)
Bijective matrix algebra
Nicholas A. Loehr
a,? , Anthony Mendes b a Department of Mathematics, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187, United States b Department of Mathematics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo,CA 93407, United States
Received 11 February 2005; accepted 6 January 2006Available online 28 February 2006
Submitted by R.A. Brualdi
Abstract
IfAandBare square matrices such thatAB=I, thenBA=Iautomatically follows. We prove acombinatorial version of this result in the case where the entries ofAandBcount collections of signed,
weighted objects. Specifically, we give an algorithm that transforms any given bijective proof of the identity
AB=Iinto an explicit bijective proof of the identityBA=I. LettingAandBbe the Kostka matrix and its inverse, this settles an open problem posed by E gecioglu and Remmel in 1990.© 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AMS classification:05E05; 05E10; 15A09; 15A24
Keywords:Involution principle; Combinatorial matrix; Proofs by bijection1. Introduction
We begin by recalling a well-known result from linear algebra.Theorem 1.LetRbe a commutative ring with1.IfA,B?M
n (R)are square matrices of order nsuch thatAB=I,thenBA=I. Research supported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship.Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses:nick@math.wm.edu(N.A. Loehr),aamendes@calpoly.edu(A. Mendes).0024-3795/$ - see front matter
(2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.laa.2006.01.004brought to you by COREView metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.ukprovided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector
918N.A. Loehr, A. Mendes / Linear Algebra and its Applications 416 (2006) 917-944
Proof.By basic properties of determinants, we have R LetA ?M n (R)denote the classical adjoint ofA, whosei,j-entry is(-1) i+j times the determi- nant of the matrix obtained by deleting rowjand columniofA.WehaveAA=det(A)I.Now,
consider the matrixC=det(B)AABA. On one hand,
C=(det(B)A
(AB))A=(det(B)AI)A=det(B)(A
A)=det(B)det(A)I=1
R I=I.On the other hand,
C=det(B)(A
A)(BA)=(det(B)det(A)I)(BA)=1
RIBA=BA.
Hence,BA=C=I.?
The goal of this paper is to present a combinatorial version of this theorem. In combinatorics, one often deals with matrices whose entries enumerate collections of signed, weighted objects. objects associated to each entry of the matrix productAB. By defining suitable sign-reversing involutions on these collections, one can obtain abijective proofthatAB=I. Similarly, we can try to find bijective proofs thatBA=I. In many applications, there are explicitly defined involutions that proveAB=I, but there are no known involutions that proveBA=I. Some examples of this phenomenon are given below. Theorem1easily implies theexistenceof such involutions, but it does not provide an explicitconstructionfor them. In the first part of this paper (§2through §6), we extend Theorem1to an algorithm that takes as input any explicit bijective proof of the identityAB=I, and constructs as output an explicit ous definition of what we mean by a bijective proof of a matrix identity. Second, we must develop combinatorial versions of the basic properties of matrices and determinants used in the proof of Theorem1. We give a combinatorial formulation of each property that is proved by constructing an explicit bijection. Third, we show how each step in the proof of Theorem1can be carried out in this combinatorial setting. A variant of the Garsia-Milne involution principle [5] will be a key technical tool in completing this agenda. The involution principle is of fundamental importance in bijective combinatorics; for other applications of this principle, see for instance [6,7,10]. Now we give some examples to which our general result can be applied. The first example, involving the combinatorial Kostka matrix and its inverse, is thoroughly analyzed in the second part of this paper (§7).Example 2.LetAbetheKostkamatrixK
n oftheintegern.Theλ,μ-entryofK n -1n wasgiven by E gecioglu and Remmel [4]. Those authors defined sign-reversing involutions proving that K n K -1n =I. They also posed the problem of constructing involutions to show thatK -1n K n =I. author [9]. Our theorem will construct involutions proving the complete resultK -1n K n =I. Besides solving the open problem from [4], our involutions may lead to further progress on the (3+1)-free conjecture of Stanley and Stembridge [3,12].Example 3.SupposeX
1 ={u :μ?n}andX 2 ={v :μ?n}are two bases for the vector space of symmetric functions of degreen. LettingAbe the transition matrix fromX 1 toX 2 and N.A. Loehr, A. Mendes / Linear Algebra and its Applications 416 (2006) 917-944919Bthe transition matrix fromX
2 toX 1 ,wehaveAB=IandBA=I. For many classical choices of the basesX 1 andX 2 , the entries of these transition matrices have combinatorial interpretations [1]. Moreover, one can often give combinatorial proofs thatAB=I[11]. Our method will then furnish a combinatorial proof of the companion identityBA=I. The previous example is the special case whereX 1 andX 2 are the monomial basis and the Schur basis (or the Schur basis and the homogeneous basis).Example 4.For eachn?0, let{u
:μ?n}and{v :μ?n}be bases for the vector space of symmetric functions of degreen. It is well known [8, Theorem I.4.6, p. 63] that the following two statements are equivalent. (1){u }and{v }are dual bases relative to the Hall scalar product. (2)? u (x)v (y)=? i,j (1-x i y j -1 n andB n suchthat(1)isequivalent to the statement thatA n B n =Ifor alln, while (2) is equivalent to the statement thatB n A n =I for alln. Using the result of the present paper, we see that a combinatorial proof of (1) will automatically lead to a combinatorial proof of (2), and vice versa. Example 5.Whitegavebijectiveproofsoftheorthogonalityrelationsofthefirstandsecondkind for the characters of the symmetric groupS n [14,15]. Using a suitable encoding of the character table ofS n as a matrixA, these results can be interpreted as combinatorial proofs of the identities AA T =IandA T A=I. Our general method could be applied to the proof in [14] to obtain automatically a bijective proof of the result in [15]. We could equally well apply our method to Acan also be viewed as the transition matrix between the Schur functionss and the power-sum symmetric functionsp . Thus, this example is another special case of Example3. Example 6.LetAbe then×nmatrix whosei,j-entry isS(i,j), the Stirling number of the second kind. LetBbe then×nmatrix whosei,j-entry iss(i,j), the (signed) Stirling number of the first kind. It is well known (see, e.g., Proposition 1.4.1(a) in [13]) thatAB=I, i.e.,? k?0S(i,k)s(k,j)=δ
i,j for alli,j. Bijective proofs of this matrix identity can be given using rook theory [11]. Our theorem can therefore be applied to give a bijective proof thatBA=I, i.e.,? k?0 s(i,k)S(k,j)=δ i,j for alli,j.2. Combinatorial scalars and their properties
up the basic notation used in our model. We also prove the confluence lemma," which will be a fundamental tool for automatically constructing involutions.2.1. Ordinary scalars and combinatorial scalars
Definition 7.Lett?0 be a fixed integer. Anordinary scalaris an element of the polynomial ringR=Z[x 1 ,...,x t ].Aweight monomialis an element ofRof the formx e 1 1 x e 2 2···x
e t t . LetM denote the set of all weight monomials inR.920N.A. Loehr, A. Mendes / Linear Algebra and its Applications 416 (2006) 917-944
Intuitively, the exponents of the variablesx
i will keep track oftdifferent weights of combina- torial objects. When dealing with unweighted objects, we can lett=0 andR=Z. In this case,M={1}.
We now formally define the notion of a collection of signed, weighted objects. Definition 8.Acombinatorial scalaris a triple(A,s,w), whereAis a finite set of objects.
s:A→{+1,-1}is asign functionthat assigns a sign (positive or negative) to each object in A. w:A→Mis aweight functionthat assigns a weight monomial to each object inA. Thegenerating functionfor(A,s,w)is the ordinary scalar ?((A,s,w))=? x?A s(x)w(x)?R. ofsandw. Definition 9.We define combinatorial scalars0,1, and-1as follows: 0=(∅,s,w), wheresandware the empty function.1=({1},s,w), wheres(1)=+1 andw(1)=1.
-1=({-1},s,w), wheres(-1)=-1 andw(-1)=1.
2.2. Equivalence of combinatorial scalars
Definition 10.Let(A,s,w)and(B,s
,w )be two combinatorial scalars. A functionf:A→B is called asign-preserving, weight-preserving bijection(orSPWP-map, for short) if and only if fis a bijection such that s (f(x))=s(x)andw (f(x))=w(x)for allx?A.We say thatAandBareequivalentviaf, denotedA
f ≡B, if and only if we have explicitly this notation toA≡B.We stress that the notationA
f ≡B(orA≡B) does not simply mean that there exists some SPWP-mapf:A→B. It means that we have constructed a specific instance of such a map, in terms of previously constructed maps or from scratch. When we say thatfis an explicit" bijection, we mean that we can write down algorithms that computef(x)given anyx?Aand f -1 (y)given anyy?B. With these conventions in mind, the following lemma is easily proved. N.A. Loehr, A. Mendes / Linear Algebra and its Applications 416 (2006) 917-944921Lemma 11.LetA,B,Cbe combinatorial scalars.
(1)A id A ≡A. (2)A f ≡BimpliesB f -1 ≡A. (3)A f ≡BandB g ≡CimpliesA g◦f ≡C. (4)A f ≡Bimplies?(A)=?(B). The converse of (4) is not true, since merely knowing that?(A)=?(B)does not allow us to single out a specific SPWP-mapf:A→B.2.3. Reduction of combinatorial scalars
Definition 12.Let(A,s,w)be a combinatorial scalar. A functiong:A→Ais called asign- reversing, weight-preserving involution(orSRWP-map, for short) if and only if the following conditions hold for alla?A:g(g(a))=a;
w(g(a))=w(a);
eitherg(a)=a,ors(g(a))=-s(a).
We let Fxd(g)denote{a?A:g(a)=a}, the set offixed pointsofg. Definition 13.LetAandBbecombinatorialscalars.WesaythatAreducestoBviamaps(g,g 0 denotedA (g,g 0 -→Bor simplyA?-→B, if and only if we have explicitly constructed a SRWP-mapquotesdbs_dbs21.pdfusesText_27[PDF] matrix generator
[PDF] matrix injective
[PDF] matrix inverse 2x2 calculator
[PDF] matrix inverse method
[PDF] matrix multiplication c++
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator 2x2
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator 3x3
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator desmos
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator emath
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator online
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator with steps
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator with variables
[PDF] matrix multiplication calculator wolfram
[PDF] matrix multiplication example