[PDF] multiplicateur de depense publique(definition)
[PDF] revenu d'équilibre en économie fermée
[PDF] élasticité de substitution fonction ces
[PDF] calculer la valeur du revenu national d'équilibre
[PDF] calcul élasticité de substitution
[PDF] exercice corrigé multiplicateur keynésien
[PDF] élasticité de substitution cobb douglas
[PDF] revenu d'équilibre macroéconomique
[PDF] élasticité de substitution microéconomie
[PDF] calcul du revenu de plein emploi
[PDF] revenu d'équilibre définition
[PDF] élasticité de substitution exemple
[PDF] manuel iphone 7
[PDF] indexation et recherche d'image par contenu
[PDF] cours indexation image
I propose the following road to a proof. For anytsuch that 0< t <1, let =tf(x)tf(x) + (1t)f(x0): Then Sincegis a concave function, it must be that g tf(x) + (1t)f(x0)tg(f(x)) + (1t)gf(x0):(5)
[PDF] revenu d'équilibre en économie fermée
[PDF] élasticité de substitution fonction ces
[PDF] calculer la valeur du revenu national d'équilibre
[PDF] calcul élasticité de substitution
[PDF] exercice corrigé multiplicateur keynésien
[PDF] élasticité de substitution cobb douglas
[PDF] revenu d'équilibre macroéconomique
[PDF] élasticité de substitution microéconomie
[PDF] calcul du revenu de plein emploi
[PDF] revenu d'équilibre définition
[PDF] élasticité de substitution exemple
[PDF] manuel iphone 7
[PDF] indexation et recherche d'image par contenu
[PDF] cours indexation image
![Proving that a Cobb-Douglas function is concave if the sum of Proving that a Cobb-Douglas function is concave if the sum of](https://pdfprof.com/Listes/18/14614-18concavity.pdf.pdf.jpg)
Proving that a Cobb-Douglas function is concave
if the sum of exponents is no bigger than 1Ted Bergstrom, Econ 210A, UCSB
If you tried this problem in your homework, you learned from painful experi- ence that the Hessian conditions for concavity of the Cobb-Douglas functionF(x1;:::xn) =nY
i=1xii fromWe rst note the following:
Lemma 1.The function dened by
F(x1;:::xn) =nY
i=1xii is homogeneous of degreePni=1i.
You should be able to supply the proof of this lemma. We next note thatFis quasi-concave. To show this, we make use of the fact that any monotone increasing transformation of a concave function is quasi-concave.Lemma 2.A functionFis quasi-concave ifh(x) =g
(F(x))is a concave function for some strictly increasing functiongfrom1=(1t)f(x0)tf(x) + (1t)f(x0):
Substituting these expressions forand 1into the inequality 1, we have the inequality ftx+ (1t)x0tf(x) + (1t)f(x0) 1 (2)Sincefis homogeneous of degree 1, it follows
f tx+ (1t)x0tf(x) + (1t)f(x0) =1tf(x) + (1t)f(x0)f(tx+ (1t)x0) and therefore the inequality 2 implies that f(tx+ (1t)x0)tf(x) + (1t)f(x0): which means thatfis a concave function.2 What if 0Combining the inequalities 3 and 5, we have
g f(tx+ (1t)x0)tg(f(x)) + (1t)gf(x0)(6) Recalling the denition ofh, we see that the inequality 6 can be written as h tx+ (1t)x0th(x) + (1t)h(x0):(7)But the inequality 7 is the condition forhto be a concave function.How does Theorem 2 help? Letk=Pi. We can verify that the Cobb-
Douglas functionFmust be homogeneous of degreek. DeneH(x) = F(x)1=k. We note thatHis homogeneous of degree 1 and quasi-concave. ThereforeHis homogeneous of degree 1. From Theorem 1 we know thatH is concave. NowF(x) =g(H(x)) whereg(y) =yk. The second-derivative test shows us thatgis a concave function. So it follows from Theorem 2 thatFis a concave function.