played equations in TEX are of such long standing that they a new LATEX package called breqn that substan- that long equations will break automatically at
Previous PDF | Next PDF |
[PDF] The autobreak package
23 fév 2017 · The goal of the autobreak package is to give a reasonably simple solution for (semi-)automatic line breaking of long formulae within LATEX1 automatic fashion and is useful for more sophisticated line breaking, unless you get “Dimension too large” error for really big expressions
[PDF] Breaking equations - TeX Users Group
played equations in TEX are of such long standing that they a new LATEX package called breqn that substan- that long equations will break automatically at
[PDF] Users Guide for the amsmath Package (Version 20)
Except for split, each environment has both starred and unstarred forms, where the unstarred forms have automatic numbering using LATEX's equation counter
Users Guide for the amsmath Package - American Mathematical
Except for split, each environment has both starred and unstarred forms, where the unstarred forms have automatic numbering using LATEX's equation counter
[PDF] How to Typeset Equations in LATEX - Stefan M Moser
29 sept 2017 · If an equation is too long, we have to wrap it somehow LATEX will automatically assume that the operator cannot be unary and will therefore
[PDF] Dealing with long equations - ResearchGate
LATEX doesn't break long equations to make them fit within the margins as it does with normal text It is therefore up to you to format the equation appropriately
math displays
The AMS environments for typesetting multiline math formulas are introduced in Sections 5 2 through 5 7 /tex-archive/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/
IEEE Math Typesetting Guide - Publish with IEEE Journals
\end{equation*} • For multiline unnumbered display equations, please use only the LaTeX will automatically format the limits correctly when within a fraction
[PDF] 15 Math Extensions with AMS-LATEX - Higher Education Pearson
Another command to insert normal text inside a displayed equation is the mathematical meaning, something that LATEX cannot automatically recognize One often needs multiline limits or indices for summations, as in the examples below
[PDF] The Not So Short Introduction to LATEX2ε
LATEX is available for most computers, from the PC and Mac to large UNIX and VMS systems 3 3 Building Blocks of a Mathematical Formula 52 The character can also be used to split long input lines where no whitespace or characters), because LATEX does not automatically hyphenate words con-
[PDF] latex bold math
[PDF] latex break url in bibliography natbib
[PDF] latex cases
[PDF] latex change font size in table row
[PDF] latex chapter style thesis
[PDF] latex cite website generator
[PDF] latex column vector
[PDF] latex diagonal fraction
[PDF] latex epigraph center
[PDF] latex epigraph no line
[PDF] latex euro symbol
[PDF] latex fontsize
[PDF] latex fractional font size
[PDF] latex header font size
Breaking equations
Michael Downes
American Mathematical Society
PO Box 6248
Providence, RI 02940
USA mjd@ams.orgIntroduction
Some of the inconvenient aspects of writing dis-
played equations in TEX are of such long standing
that they are scarcely noticed any more except by beginning users. For example, if an equation must be broken into more than one line,\left...\right constructs cannot span lines. This is a report on anewL ATEX package calledbreqnthat substan-
tially eliminates many of the most signicant prob- lems (described at length in the next section). Its main goal is to support automatic linebreaking of displayed equations, to the extent possible within the current limitations of TEXandL
ATEX. Such line-
breaking cannot be done, however, without substan- tial changes under the hood in the way math formu- las are processed. Some of the changes are radical enough that it would be more natural to do them in L ATEX3 than in L
ATEX2e|e.g., for L
ATEX3 there is
a standing proposal to have nearly all nonalphanu- meric characters be active by default; having^and _active this way would have eased some implemen- tation problems. Using the package in L ATEX2e is
possible, with some extra care.Current shortcomings in L
ATEX equation
handlingHindrances for authorsThe following diculties
aect authors using the standard L ATEXequation
andeqnarrayenvironments. Some of them are ameliorated by the use of theamsmathpackage. (The rst four also apply for plain TEX; and the
main reason the next three don't apply as well is that plain TEX replaces them with a more substantial
shortcoming: no automatic numbering at all.)1. Line breaks must be inserted by hand.
2. Breaks are sensitive to changes in fonts or
column width; and altering them is onerous.3. A break within\left-\rightdelimiters re-
quires extra work, especially if there is any dif- culty getting the sizes to match.4. Use of\halignfreezes available shrink. Thus,
for example, suppose that a given formulats within the column when done with an equationenvironment; the exact same formula may fail to t when done with aneqnarray environment, becauseeqnarrayuses\halign internally.5. Punctuation at the end of an equation logically
belongs with the surrounding text but it must be entered with the body of the equation in order to print in the right place. This discord is especially noticeable when promoting formulas from inline math to display.6. A numbered equation that takes several lines
in aneqnarrayrequires awkward use of \nonumberto keep from getting a number on each line.7. Numbers may overlap the equation body with-
out warning (ineqnarrayand similar struc- tures).8. There is no easy way to specify a variant
equation number for an individual equation.9. The space around equal signs ineqnarrayis
noticeably larger than the normal spacing for such symbols. This looks bad when adjacent equations are done one withequationand one witheqnarray.10. There is no easy way to center an equation num-
ber across multiple lines of a broken equation.Some users manage to infer thatarrayis the
natural approach for this, but a plainarray has various spacing faults for this purpose, and uses text style instead of display style for the contents.11. There is no easy way to add a frame around the
body of an equation (with or without including the equation number). You can just about do it with a one-line equation if there's no number and if you know about\displaystyle.But with multiline equations it's rather more
dicult (use ofarrayis again indicated, but it brings all the deciencies cited in the preceding item).182TUGboat, Volume 18 (1997), No. 3|Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting
Breaking equations
The bosonic part of the action takes the form
I=I 00 +I 01 +I 10 +(14) where I 00 =(2) 3 02 Z d 6 xpΓGe R G +G MN M N 1 12G MQ G NR G PS H MNP H QRS (15) whereM;N=0;:::;5 are spacetime indices. \begin{eqnarray}\nonumberI_{00}&=& \frac{(2\pi)^3}{\alpha^{\prime 2}}
\int d^6x \sqrt{-G}e^{-\Phi} \left[R_G+G^{MN} \partial_M\Phi\partial_N\Phi\right.\\ && \left.-\frac{1}{12}G^{MQ}G^{NR}G^{PS}H_{MNP}H_{QRS}\right] \end{eqnarray}Figure 1: Typical equation problems in ordinary L
ATEX: (a) dierent spacing around the equals signs
in (14) and (15) because one usesequationand the other useseqnarray; (b) equation (15) is a single equation but because it covers two lines\nonumbermust be used on the rst line; (c) and then the number is not vertically centered on the entire equation; (d) the sizes of\left [in the rst line and \right ]in the second line don't match (they could be made to match, with extra work); and (e) theminus sign at the beginning of the second line is getting (wrong) unary spacing. This example is from
(Du, Minasian, and Witten, 1996), with only a couple of minor adaptations.