Code, § 6103 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA, Defendant and Petitioner, v
| Previous PDF | Next PDF |
[PDF] Handout on Writs - California Courts - CAgov
contemplating filing or responding to a petition for writ of mandate, writ of prohibition If you fail to meet the statutory deadline, the appellate court will not have
[PDF] PETITION FOR WRIT OF [TYPE OF WRIT - California Courts
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE Goldilocks petitions this Court for a writ of mandate or other appropriate
[PDF] PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDATE - Sixth District Appellate
“A writ of mandate may be issued by any court to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station, or to compel the admission of a party to the use and enjoyment of a right or office to which
[PDF] Writ of Mandate Outline1 - The Legal Aid Association of California
In a mandate proceeding, the petitioner asks the superior or appellate court to direct an inferior judicial or administrative body to do something B Confusing,
[PDF] Petition for Writ of Mandate - Disability Rights California
APPELLATE DISTRICT Petitioner, vs The Superior Court of the State of a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1085 as follows: 1
[PDF] City of Petaluma v Superior Court - Petition for Writ of Mandate
Code, § 6103 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA, Defendant and Petitioner, v
[PDF] TO WRIT OR NOT TO WRIT? TAKING THE DRAMA OUT OF
granting or denying a petition for writ of mandate prohibition, or certiorari complete review of six-months of California writ filings will suggest some optimal guarantee that the Court of Appeal will review the merits of a writ petition
[PDF] Puttin On The Writs: 10 Tips For Petitioning For Calif Appeal
30 sept 2016 · Problem: You want to challenge a California superior court ruling, but you have no 1 in seeking a writ is convincing the court of appeal there's Kaiser if Kaiser filed a petition for writ of mandate in which it asked us to finally
[PDF] Petition for Writ of Mandate or Prohibition -- Abbott Laboratories v
IN THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE OR PROHIBITION; interest of 10 percent or more in Petitioner Abb Vie Inc
[PDF] petroleum ether in diels alder reaction
[PDF] petsmart
[PDF] petty session court cases
[PDF] petty session court in jamaica
[PDF] peut on apprendre l'anglais en 3 mois
[PDF] peut on s'inscrire au permis sans assr
[PDF] peut on apprendre à nager
[PDF] pew research bots
[PDF] pf2263g oil filter
[PDF] pfaff icon problems
[PDF] pfaff machine needs to rest
[PDF] pfaff parts
[PDF] pg cet kea.kar.nic.in
[PDF] pg diploma courses in ignou university
REQUEST FOR STAY; TRIAL COURT STAY OF
DISCOVERY EXPIRES JULY 6, 2015
1st Civ. No. ______________Public Entity
~ No Fee Required ~Gov. Code, § 6103
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
CITY OF PETALUMA,
Defendant and Petitioner,
v.SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, FOR THE COUNTY OF
SONOMA,
Respondent.
ANDREA WATERS,
Plaintiff and Real Party in Interest.Sonoma County SuperiorCourt/Empire College AnnexCase No. SCV 256309
Hon. Elliot Lee Daum, Judge
Courtroom: 16
Telephone: (707) 521-6547
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, PROHIBITION OR OTHERAPPROPRIATE RELIEF; REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE STAY;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
[Exhibits Filed Under Separate Cover]____________________________________________THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
CITY OF PETALUMAEric W. Danly, City Attorney11 English StreetPetaluma, California 94952 Telephone: (707) 778-4497Email: edanly@ci.petaluma.ca.us
BURKE, WILLIAMS, & SORENSEN, LLPSamantha W. Zutler, State Bar No. 238514101 Howard Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94105-6125 Telephone: (415) 655.8100 ~ Facsimile: (415) 655.8099Email: szutler@bwslaw.com
GREINES, MARTIN, STEIN & RICHLAND LLPTimothy T. Coates, State Bar No. 110364*Alison M. Turner, State Bar No. 1162105900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th FloorLos Angeles, California 90036Email: aturner@gmsr.comTelephone: (310) 859-7811 ~ Facsimile: (310) 276-5261
Attorneys for Defendant and Petitioner CITY OF PETALUMATO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
APP-008
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONECourt Of Appeal Case Number:
ATIORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATIORNEY (Name, state Bar number, end address}: Superior Court Cesa Number.
Alison M. Turner, State Bar No. 116210
SCV256309
-GREINES, MARTIN, STEIN & RICHLAND LLP5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Los Angeles, California 90036
TELEPHONE NO.: (3 lQ) 859-7811 FAX NO. (OptlonaQ: (3 lQ) 276-5261E-MAIL ADDRESS (OplionaQ: aturner@gmsr.com
ATIORNEYFOR(NameJ: Defendant and Petitioner CITY OF PETALUMAAPPELLANT/PETITIONER: CITY OF PETALUMA
RESPONDENT/REAL PARTY IN INTEREST: ANDREA WATERS
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS
(Check one): [Z] INITIAL CERTIFICATE 0 SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATENotice: Please read rules 8.208 and 8.488 before completing this form. You may use this form for the initial
certificate in an appeal when you file your brief or a prebriefing motion, application, or opposition to such a
motion or application in the Court of Appeal, and when you file a petition for an extraordinary writ. You may
also use this form as a supplemental certificate when you learn of changed or additional information that must
be disclosed.1. This form is being submitted on behalf of the following party (name): Defendant and Petitioner CITY OF PETALUMA
2. a. [Z] There are no interested entities or persons that must be listed in this certificate under rule 8.208.
b. D Interested entities or persons required to be listed under rule 8.208 are as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Full name of Interested
entity or personD Continued on attachment 2.
Nature of Interest
(Explain):The undersigned certifies that the above-listed persons or entitles (corporations, partnerships, firms, or any other
association,but not Including government entitles or their agencies) have either (1) an ownership Interest of 10 percent or
more In the party If It Is an entity; or (2) a financial or other Interest In the outcome of the proceeding that the justices
should consider In determining whether to disqualify themselves, as defined In rule 8.208(e)(2).