[PDF] Pragmatics: Maxims of conversation

There are ten essential maxims or precepts in commercial law

1 3 This one is one of the most comforting maxims one could have, and your foundation for your peace-of-mind and your security and your capacity to win and triumph -- to get your remedy -- in this business IN COMMERCE TRUTH IS SOVEREIGN (Exodus 20:16; Ps 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor 13:8 ) Truth is sovereign --and the Sovereign tells only the

Maxim of Manner - HKBU

violation of maxims is called “flouting” We do not expect the Maxim to be violated Flouting must be motivated Inferences obtained from flouting of maxims are called implicatures The woman in red may be implicating that Lauri is Laura’s nemesis

Flouting Grice’s Maxims - Boston University

Flouting Grice’s Maxims Here are a couple of examples (from lecture) of implicatures that arise through a speaker’s deliberate and obvious violation of some conversational maxim (In Grice’s terms, the speaker has “flouted” the maxim ) You may like to refer to these examples when formulating your responses in Assignment 3, Part I

Pragmatics: Maxims of conversation

2 Violating conversational maxims • Often, more than one maxim is violated at a time - Practice considering which maxims are violated in a conversation, and making an argument for your choice - See also the assigned and optional videos for more examples 13

Flouting the maxims in comedy - DiVA portal

These maxims were introduced by the philosopher of language Paul H Grice (Maienborn 2011:18) These maxims are rules which are normally followed in a conversation in order for people to understand each other on a direct and basic level However, maxims can be violated, which means that they are not adhered to

Some Instances of Violation and Flouting of the Maxim of

Violation of Maxims Violation, according to Grice (1975), takes place when speakers intentionally refrain to apply certain maxims in their conversation to cause misunderstanding on their participants’ part or to achieve some other purposes The following are examples of violation in the four aforementioned maxims:

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

other examples of maxims “When I am asked by the government to pay taxes, I won’t pay ” “When it is election day, I will vote ” “When it is election day, I will skip voting and sleep in instead ” “When it’s at all inconvenient to recycle a plastic bottle, I’ll throw it in the trash ”

LX 502 - Conversational Implicatures - Boston University

the maxims These are listed in (12) (12) i The speaker may observe the maxims—this is the default assumption ii The speaker may opt out of a maxim by using a phrase that eliminates or mitigates the effect of the maxims and signals this to the addressee—this phrase is called a hedge iii

19 maxims of equity - WordPresscom

Nov 19, 2014 · The maxims of equity evolved, in Latin and eventually translated into English , as the principles applied by courts of equity in deciding cases before them [1] An English authority states about the maxims of equity: "The Maxims do not cover the whole ground, and moreover they overlap, one maxim contains by implication what belongs to

[PDF] créer une affiche de cinéma

[PDF] description de l'affiche du film avatar

[PDF] methode analyse affiche de film

[PDF] exemple de maxime populaire

[PDF] conte merveilleux caractéristiques

[PDF] recit merveilleux

[PDF] les fonctions de la fable

[PDF] film de lycée americain

[PDF] wie vielseitig ist die mobilität der jugend

[PDF] dissertation sur l ingénu

[PDF] l ingénu problématique

[PDF] la belle au bois dormant perrault texte

[PDF] des fils electrique

[PDF] la belle au bois dormant histoire originale

[PDF] diametre fil electrique

LING 101Intro to Language

• Pragmatics:

Maxims of conversation

Background reading:

• CL Ch 6, §4.4, "Grice's conversational maxims" 1

1.The Cooperative Principle

•How is it possible for people to use language in ways that communicate more than what is said? •This is part of the linguistic subifield of pragmatics, the study of language meaning in context •Two ways that people can use language to communicate more than what is literally stated or asserted are: -Presupposition -The Cooperative Principle in conversation 2

1.The Cooperative Principle

•Consider the following conversation: Editor: I'm considering hiring your student, X, as a writer. What can you tell me about X? Writing teacher: X has good handwriting, and always comes to class on time. •Did the teacher communicate anything useful? -What was it? -Was that information communicated directly, through word and/or sentence semantics? -How did communication happen? 3

1.The Cooperative Principle

•Consider the following conversation: Editor: I'm considering hiring your student, X, as a writer. What can you tell me about X? Writing teacher: X has good handwriting, and always comes to class on time. •Did the teacher communicate anything useful?| Yes! -What was it? | X is not a good choice for a writer -Was that information communicated directly, through word and/or sentence semantics? | No! -How did communication happen? →keep reading 4

1.The Cooperative Principle

•A very inlfluential approach to the question of how people communicate things in this way:

The Cooperative Principle along with the four

conversational maxims (H. Paul Grice, 1967/1975) •Proposal: Human conversations operate according to the Cooperative Principle: "Make your contribution appropriate to the conversation." (CL, p 249) 5

1.The Cooperative Principle

•Of course, it is not the case that everyone really is cooperative all the time But the idea is that people tend to interpret what they hear (or read) based on the assumption that the other speaker meant to be cooperative •Even more interesting:

Sometimes, people act in a way that is obviously

not cooperative, in order to communicate something by doing that

This is one type of →indirect communication

6

1.The Cooperative Principle

•One basic way of conforming to the Cooperative Principle is to follow the four conversational maxims (CL, p 250):

Maxim of Relevance - Make your contribution

relevant.

Maxim of Quality - Make your contribution true.

(Do not say things that are known to be false, or for which you lack adequate evidence.) Maxim of Quantity - Do not make your contribution either more or less informative than is required. Maxim of Manner - Avoid ambiguity and obscurity; be brief and orderly. ("Eschew obfuscation.") 7

2.Violating conversational maxims

•What happens if you violate a maxim, and you hide that fact from your conversation partner?

A: Did you eat the last cookie?

B: No. [when B did in fact eat the last cookie]

-Violation of the Maxim of Quality (untrue)

Deception!→

8

2.Violating conversational maxims

•What happens if you violate a maxim, but you make that fact completely obvious? (this is often called lflouting a maxim) →The assumption that you are following the

Cooperative Principle overall still holds!

-This is a means of indirect communication 9

2.Violating conversational maxims

•Consider our recommendation example again: Editor: I'm considering hiring your student, X, as a writer. What can you tell me about X? Writing teacher: X has good handwriting, and always comes to class on time. • Which maxim(s) is/are violated, and what does this violation actually communicate? 10

2.Violating conversational maxims

Editor: I'm considering hiring your student, X, as a writer. What can you tell me about X? Writing teacher: X has good handwriting, and always comes to class on time. •The teacher is violating the maxims of Quantity (not giving enough information) and Relevance (giving irrelevant information) -This strategy generally communicates, "I have nothing good to say about X as a writer"; that is, "Anything relevant I could say would not be in X's favor" 11

2.Violating conversational maxims

•Blatantly violating, or lflouting, a conversational maxim often indicates politeness or indirectness -indirect requests -avoidance of directly stating unpleasant information •Sarcasm often involves blatantly violating a maxim - often Quality (saying the opposite of what you mean) 12

2.Violating conversational maxims

•Often, more than one maxim is violated at a time -Practice considering which maxims are violated in a conversation, and making an argument for your choice -See also the assigned and optional videos for more examples 13

3.Advertising, revisited

•Recall this example from earlier:

Everything in the store is up to 75% offf!

→ Desired conclusion: "Everything/most things are actually 75% offf" -We saw before that this conclusion is not entailed by the language in the ad •What maxim(s) of conversation would encourage the consumer to draw these conclusions? 14quotesdbs_dbs2.pdfusesText_2