[PDF] Pairwise vs Three-way Independence



Previous PDF Next PDF







Joint Distributions, Independence Covariance and Correlation

Joint Distributions, Independence Covariance and Correlation 18 05 Spring 2014 n 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 2 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36 1/36



Joint Probability Distributions and Random Samples (Devore

The conditions for a given xare y 0, y>x, and y 1 So the minimum possible yis x and the maximum is 1, and the integral is P(X



CSE 312 Foundations of Computing II

CSE 312 Foundations of Computing II Lecture 5: Intro to Discrete Probability 1 Slide Credit: Based on Stefano Tessaro’sslides for 312 19au incorporating ideas from Alex Tsun’sand Anna Karlin’sslides for 312 20su and 20au



Pairwise vs Three-way Independence

Pairwise vs Three-way Independence This is a very classic example, reported in any book on Probability: Example 1 We throw two dice Let A be the event “the sum of the points is 7”, B the event “die #1



Chapter 6: Random Variables

iables Alternate Example – Dice, Cars, and Hoops Problem: Determine whether the random variables below have a binomial distribution Justify your answer (a) Roll a fair die 10 times and let X=the number of sixes



Supplément au№ 11du „ Jura Vaudoi s du17 mars 1967 Dédicace

dicace du templ restaure de Sainté - Livres Aussi les cloches sonnèrent-elles gaiemen pout convier r officiels et paroissiens à dan se recueillis r l'édifice cossu tou, dt e blancheur sur son promontoir anime é de frêles bou­ leaux Le seuil franchi, une clarté paisible accueille le fidèle charm l'haré pa­r



Worked examples — Basic Concepts of Probability Theory

Worked examples — Basic Concepts of Probability Theory Example 1 A regular tetrahedron is a body that has four faces and, if is tossed, the probability that it lands on any face is 1/4



WordPresscom

Couverture du livre dit e par une entreprise ctive, Paratonnerre SA, comme exemple "#$ &'()*"$)$+#+$+,-#+$ )($"#"$ &&'##'()*



Du Plessys, Maurice Le Premier Livre pastoral de Maurice Du

Funeste aux monstres, qu'à l'exemple sans reproche D'un Hercules, tu renouvelles par le mer u Les grands exploits dont fut sa gloire éternisée ; Qu'à quatre éclairs, le casque-en tête de-Pérsée,- --

[PDF] dédicace mémoire pour les parents

[PDF] dédicace thèse exemple

[PDF] exemple de dédicace de mémoire

[PDF] dédicace mémoire master

[PDF] tableau des déterminants français

[PDF] exercices déterminants indéfinis cm2

[PDF] déterminant indéfini liste

[PDF] déterminants définis

[PDF] determinant indefinis et definis

[PDF] déterminants interrogatifs

[PDF] déterminant numéraux

[PDF] pronoms indéfinis

[PDF] comment se servir d'audacity en français

[PDF] tutoriel audacity francais pdf

[PDF] audacity pdf

Pairwise vs. Three-way Independence

This is a very classic example, reported in any book on Probability: Example 1.We throw two dice. LetAbe the event "the sum of the points is 7",Bthe event "die #1 came up 3", andCthe event "die #2 came up 4". Now,P[A]=P[B]=P[C]=16 . Also,

P[A∩B]=P[A∩C]=P[B∩C]=1

36
so that all events are pairwise independent. However,

P[A∩B∩C]=P[B∩C]=1

36
while

P[A]P[B]P[C]=1

216
so they are not independent as a triplet. First, note that, indeed,P[A∩B] =P[B∩C] =1 36
, since the fact thatAandBoccurred is the same as the fact thatBandCoccurred.

Example 2.Another example is the case ofΩconsisting of four equally likely points,a1, a2, a3, a4. Let

A={a1,a2},B={a2,a3},C={a3a1}. The three are not independent, but they are pairwise.

However, it is also true that, as long as we consider only specific events (that is, we don"t take into consid-

eration their complements, or, more generally, other members of their algebra), that mutual (3-way) inde-

pendencedoes not imply pairwise independence!

Here is a somewhat trivial example:

Example 3.LetP[A]=p,P[B]=q,P[A∩B]

?pq,P[C]=0then, trivially, butAandBare not pairwise independent.

A less trivial example is the following:

Example 4.Consider the toss of two distinct dice. The sample space is partitioned into equally likely

events of the form(i, j), whereiandjare the points on the first, respectively second die. Obviously,

P[(i, j)]=1

36
. Now, consider the three events A

1=??i=1,2,or3??A2=??i=3,4,or5??A3=i+j=9

1

We have

A A

1∩A3={(3,6)}

A

2∩A3={(3,6),(4,5),(5,4)}

A

1∩A2∩A3={(3,6)}

We have the following probabilities:

P[A1]=P[A2]=12

,P[A3]=19

P[A1∩A2∩A3]=1

36=P[A1]P[A2]P[A3]

but

P[A1∩A2]=16

?14

P[A1∩A3]=1

36?1
18

P[A2∩A3]=1

12?1 18

Note, referring to Example 2, thatP[Cc] = 1, so thatP[Cc∩A∩B] =P[A∩B]?1·p·q, so that consid-

ering the complement of one of the sets makes the new triplet dependent. Similarly, referring to Example

3,P[A3c]=89

, and A which has probability 5 36
?12·12·89=29. Note that this fact does not apply to pairs of events: Fact:IfAis independent ofB, then so are, pairwise,AcandB,AandBc, andAcandBc. That"s

because, for example,P[A∩Bc] =P[A∩(Ω\B)]andP[A∩(Ω\B)] +P[A∩B] =P[A], soP[A∩Bc] +

P[A]P[B] =P[A], henceP[A∩Bc] =P[A]-P[A]P[B] =P[A](1-P[B]) =P[A]P[Bc]. Similarly for the other cases. This points to a better definition of independence of multiple events:

Theorem:Suppose eventsA,B,Csatisfy the conditions

P[X∩Y∩Z]=P[X]P[Y]P[Z]

whereX, Y , Zare, respectively,A, orAc,B, orBc, andC, orCc.Then they are also pairwise indepen- dent. The result extends to any finite collection of events, in an obvious way.

Proof:We can writeP[A∩B]=P[(A∩B∩C)?(A∩B∩Cc)]=P[A]P[B]P[C]+P[A]P[B]P[Cc], because

the two parts are disjoint. This is equal toP[A]P[B](P[C] +P[Cc]) =P[A]P[B]. All other cases are treated in the same way. Remark:Checking all intersections of the sets and their complementcan be seen as checking indepen-

dence of all couples built from theminimal algebra generated by each of the events, which, for an eventA,

is the collection{A,Ac,Ω,∅}. Of course, trivially,Ω, and∅are independent of any event.

While some scholars have looked at the taxonomy of events that arek-independent, but noth-inde-

pendent forh < k, this is not a very exciting subject, since, in considering independence and, more gener-

ally, conditional probabilities, it is much more significant to look at all events in the algebras the events

belong to naturally - at the very least the ones generated by each event and its complement. 2quotesdbs_dbs8.pdfusesText_14