[PDF] At a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court held



Previous PDF Next PDF







COWI North America Sea Level Rise and Adaptive Design

Port of Redwood City SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 22 PREVENTION FIRST 2016 Case Study - Accommodate San Francisco Redwood City › Scour › Low current – limited impact › Wave slam › Limited fetch – limited impact › Operations and Air Gap › Need to meet current and future water levels › Berthing or mooring compatibility issues



At a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court held

Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, et al , Defendants-Respondents -----X Plaintiff-appellant having moved for reargument of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on March 31, 2016 (Appeal No 681-682),



MOTEMS COMPLIANCE AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES

MOTEMS COMPLIANCE AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES Seismic Purpose is to establish minimum seismic analysis and structural performance Performance is evaluated at a two level criteria: Level 1 and Level 2 MOTEMS risk classification (Table 31-F-4-1) All new MOTS are classified as high risk 1 Exposed oil ≥ 1200 bbls



New Regulations from Ministry of Transport (MOT) China

out of China or Reduction of port calls for a carrier We thank you for the support that you have given to CMA CGM and request you to kindly take actions as stated below 1 In case you are an NVOCC customer, please carry out your registration process with Chinese Ministry of Transport



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF

and six-inches tall ” (Am Compl ¶ 6 ) On or about the night of January 14, 2016, Plaintiff was driving in Cecil County, Maryland, when she passed, and made eye contact with, Defendant Joseph Cunningham, a deputy in the Cecil County Sheriff’s Office who was seated in his marked police vehicle (Id ¶¶ 13-16 ) Even though Plaintiff was a



Transphobia and Cisgender Privilege: Pre-Service Teachers

Jan 08, 2016 · 2011, Wright-Maley, David, Gozalez, & Colwell, 2016) In the midst of increasing rec-ognition that more supports are needed to fully include LGBTQ youth and their families in schools, is the topic of gender Schools often serve as contexts where students come to narrowly understand gender roles and expectations, which limits the gender



CODA-4x8x DOCSIS Wifi Gateway User’s Guide

CODA-4x8x DOCSIS Wifi Gateway User’s Guide wireless



Le texte argumentatif - WordPresscom

Le port de l’uniforme est une bénédiction pour les élèves du secondaire Les réseaux sociaux nuisent à l’appentissage des jeunes Etc L’énoné d’une thèse est souvent péédé d’un goupe inident tel ue « selon moi », « à mon avis » ou d’un



DOSSIER DINITIATION A LA PROGRAMMATION GRAPHIQUE

ordinateur soit par fil ( port USB ), soit par Wifi On utilisera le logiciel « Mblock » pour créer nos programmes Le langage graphique utilisé est le scratch En suivant ce dossier pas à pas, vous apprendrez à piloter le robot mBot et bien d'autres En route En suivant ce dossier pas à pas, vous apprendrez à piloter le

[PDF] a portée de mots cm1 correction

[PDF] analyse a priori définition

[PDF] comment remplir un eur1

[PDF] analyse a posteriori didactique

[PDF] eur 1 maroc

[PDF] analyse a posteriori definition

[PDF] formulaire eur1 a telecharger

[PDF] créer un blog pdf

[PDF] comment faire un blog pdf

[PDF] comment créer un blog professionnel pdf

[PDF] avant propos mémoire master

[PDF] comment créer un blog gratuit pdf

[PDF] exemple d'avant propos d'un projet

[PDF] about elly streaming

[PDF] darbareye elly film

A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom,

Justice Presiding, David Friedman

John W. Sweeny, Jr.

David B. Saxe,

Justices.

---------------------------------------X

The People of the State of New York,

Respondent,

-against-

M-6214 Ind. No. 545/12

Pavette Kellman,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------------------------X Defendant having moved for an enlargement of time to perfect the appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court, New York

County, rendered on or about January 15, 2013,

And an order of this Court entered May 26, 2016 (M-435A) granting defendant an enlargement of time to perfect the appeal to the October 2016 Term of this Court, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is denied, as academic.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom,

Justice Presiding, David Friedman

Rosalyn H. Richter

Judith J. Gische

Ellen Gesmer,

Joseph Collins,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

-against- M-2401 Index No. 161695/13

Martin P. Unger, Esq., et al.,

Defendants-Respondents,

Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP,

et al.,

Defendants.

---------------------------------------X Plaintiff-appellant having moved for reargument of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on April 5,

2016 (Appeal No. 726-727),

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom,

Justice Presiding, John W. Sweeny, Jr.

Sallie Manzanet-Daniels

Judith J. Gische

Ellen Gesmer,

In re Alicia Davis,

Petitioner-Appellant,

-against- M-2194 Index No. 101073/13

New York City Board/Department of

Education,

Respondent-Respondent.

---------------------------------------X Petitioner-appellant having moved for reargument of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on March 31,

2016 (Appeal No. 695),

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom,

Justice Presiding, John W. Sweeny, Jr.

Sallie Manzanet-Daniels

Judith J. Gische

Ellen Gesmer,

Anthony Garguilo,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

-against- M-2216 Index No. 115054/08

Port Authority of New York & New Jersey,

et al.,

Defendants-Respondents.

Plaintiff-appellant having moved for reargument of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on March 31,

2016 (Appeal No. 681-682),

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom,

Justice Presiding, John W. Sweeny, Jr.

Sallie Manzanet-Daniels

Judith J. Gische

Ellen Gesmer,

In re Wade Whitfield,

Petitioner,

-against- M-2623 Index No. 100002/14

New York State Division of Human Rights,

et al.,

Respondents.

Petitioner having moved for reconsideration of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on March 31, 2016 (Appeal No. 684), Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom,

Justice Presiding, Dianne T. Renwick

David B. Saxe

Karla Moskowitz,

Justices.

---------------------------------------X

In re Leodegario D. Salvador,

Petitioner-Respondent,

-against- M-2010 Index No. 102913/12

Touro College, et al.,

Respondents-Appellants.

---------------------------------------X Petitioner-respondent having moved for reargument of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on March 17,

2016 (Appeal No. 24),

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom,

Justice Presiding, David B. Saxe

Rosalyn H. Richter

Barbara R. Kapnick,

Justices.

---------------------------------------X

In re Tzefang Frances Chang,

Petitioner-Appellant,

-against- M-2167 Index No. 100361/14

The Department of Education of the

City of New York, et al.,

Respondents-Respondents.

---------------------------------------X Petitioner-appellant having moved for reargument of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on March 22,

2016 (Appeal No. 371),

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK A

t a Term of the Appellate Division of the SupremeCourt held in and for the First Judicial Department in

the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT - Hon. Angela M. Mazzarelli,

Justice Presiding, Rolando T. Acosta

Richard T. Andrias

Karla Moskowitz,

Justices.

In re 175 West 107

th LLC,Petitioner-Appellant, -against- M-1597 Index No. 100428/14

State of New York Division of Housing

and Community Renewal,

Respondent-Respondent,

Bridget M. Lydia,

Intervenor-Respondent-Respondent.

Petitioner-appellant having moved for reargument of, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, from the decision and order of this Court, entered on January 19,

2016 (Appeal No. 16664),

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is ordered that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

_ ____________________ CLERK At a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court held in and for the First Judicial Department in the County of New York on June 30, 2016.

PRESENT: Hon. Angela M. Mazzarelli,

Justice Presiding, Rolando T. Acosta

David B. Saxe

Barbara R. Kapnick

quotesdbs_dbs4.pdfusesText_8