SAS Financial Management 5
PARENT Function 150 PREVIOUS Function 151 PROPERTY Function 153 ROUND Function 157 Corporate Comm Facilities Human Resources Finance Accounting
2020 Iowa Corporation Income Tax Instructions
Credits Tax Return, Form 57-150 When to File • Regular Corporations Calendar Year filers: Return is due no later than April 30, 2021 • Fiscal Year: Return is due within four months after the end of the fiscal year • Cooperative: Cooperative associations have ninth month after the close of their tax period to file a return • Short
How to calculate Corporate Activity Tax (CAT)
Instructions for calculating tax on corporate activity Office use only Page 1 of 4, 150-106-007 (Rev 04-29-20, ver 01) 20590001010000 How to calculate Corporate Activity Tax (CAT) Line 1: Amount of commercial activity sourced to Oregon Determine the total amount of commercial activity sourced
Chapter 6 – Statement of Cash Flows
The Direct Method The direct method lists the individual sources and uses of cash Typical line items include cash received from customers, cash paid to suppliers, cash paid for wages, etc
Basel III Comparison of Standardized and Advanced Approaches
Corporate Exposure 100 risk weight, including exposure to securities firms Residential Mortgages 50 risk weight for first-lien mortgage satisfying certain criteria, 100 for others Pre-sold Construction Loans and Statutory Multifamily Mortgages 50 or 100 High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Exposure (HVCRE) 150 risk weight Past Due Exposures
The True Cost of Global Tax Havens – IMF F&D
the $150 billion or so they receive each year in foreign development assistance American Fortune 500 companies alone held an estimated $2 6 trillion offshore in 2017, though a small portion of that has been repatriated following US tax reforms in 2018 Corporations aren’t the only beneficiaries
Minimum Capital Requirements
12 Part 2: The First Pillar – Minimum Capital Requirements I Calculation of minimum capital requirements 40 Part 2 presents the calculation of the total minimum capital requirements for credit,
CHAPTER 14 FREE CASH FLOW TO EQUITY DISCOUNT MODELS
4 to equity for the Home Depot each year from 1989 to 1998 in Table 14 1, using the full calculation described in the last section Table 14 1: Estimates of Free Cashflow to Equity for The Home Depot: 1989 – 1998
COMMUNIQUÉ - Canada Life
Formule 1 et à écrire la suite de l’histoire des pilotes canadiens qui l’ont précédé L’arrivée de M Stroll sur le circuit de la Formule e1 coïncide d’ailleurs avec le 150 du Canada et le 375e de Montréal, ville natale du pilote
Airbus, Bombardier et Investissement Québec concluent leur
des 100 à 150 sièges, qui devrait représenter plus de 6000 avions sur les 20 prochaines années • La portée mondiale d’Airbus créera de la valeur au profit des clients du C Series, ainsi que des fournisseurs, employés, actionnaires et collectivités
[PDF] Formule de plainte relative à une demande d accès ou de rectification
[PDF] Forte progression de la solvabilité et poursuite du renforcement de la liquidité
[PDF] Forum des métiers et de l orientation. Bilan P / 1
[PDF] FORUM INTERNATIONAL DU DAKAR-AGRICOLE
[PDF] Forum Panafricain de Haut niveau
[PDF] forum transmission reprise
[PDF] FOSAS Visitées Fonctionnalité Paquet d activités Besoins a combler Observation
[PDF] FOURNITURE DE GAZ NATUREL AU LYCEE BERARD A AMBERIEU EN BUGEY CAHIER DES CLAUSES PARTICULIERES (CCP)
[PDF] FPPU UQAC - UQAT- UQO UQTR
[PDF] Fragilité financière : une offre spécifique
[PDF] Frais de déplacement
[PDF] François Bausch. Ministre du Développement durable. et des Infrastructures
[PDF] Frédéric PERES - CCI Bayonne Pays Basque
[PDF] FUSION, EVOLUTION DES PÉRIMETRES DES ÉTABLISSEMENTS PUBLICS DE COOPÉRATION INTERCOMMUNALE
![Minimum Capital Requirements Minimum Capital Requirements](https://pdfprof.com/Listes/20/22058-20bcbs128b.pdf.pdf.jpg)
I. Calculation of minimum capital requirements
40. Part 2 presents the calculation of the total minimum capital requirements for credit,
market and operational risk. The capital ratio is calculated using the definition of regulatory capital and risk-weighted assets. The total capital ratio must be no lower than 8%. Tier 2 capital is limited to 100% of Tier 1 capital.A. Regulatory capital
41. The definition of eligible regulatory capital, as outlined in the 1988 Accord and
clarified in the 27 October 1998 press release on "Instruments eligible for inclusion in Tier 1 capital", remains in place except for the modifications in paragraphs 37 to 39 and 43. The definition is outlined in paragraphs 49 (i) to 49 (xviii) and in Annex Ia.42. Under the standardised approach to credit risk, general provisions, as explained in
paragraphs 381 to 383, can be included in Tier 2 capital subject to the limit of 1.25% of risk- weighted assets.43. Under the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach, the treatment of the 1988 Accord
to include general provisions (or general loan-loss reserves) in Tier 2 capital is withdrawn. Banks using the IRB approach for securitisation exposures or the PD/LGD approach for equity exposures must first deduct the EL amounts subject to the corresponding conditions in paragraphs 563 and 386, respectively. Banks using the IRB approach for other asset classes must compare (i) the amount of total eligible provisions, as defined in paragraph 380, with (ii) the total expected losses amount as calculated within the IRB approach and defined in paragraph 375. Where the total expected loss amount exceeds total eligible provisions, banks must deduct the difference. Deduction must be on the basis of 50% from Tier 1 and50% from Tier 2. Where the total expected loss amount is less than total eligible provisions,
as explained in paragraphs 380 to 383, banks may recognise the difference in Tier 2 capital up to a maximum of 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets. At national discretion, a limit lower than 0.6% may be applied.B. Risk-weighted assets
44. Total risk-weighted assets are determined by multiplying the capital requirements for
market risk and operational risk by 12.5 (i.e. the reciprocal of the minimum capital ratio of8%) and adding the resulting figures to the sum of risk-weighted assets for credit risk. The
Committee applies a scaling factor in order to broadly maintain the aggregate level of minimum capital requirements, while also providing incentives to adopt the more advanced risk-sensitive approaches of the Framework. 11The scaling factor is applied to the risk-
weighted asset amounts for credit risk assessed under the IRB approach. 11The current best estimate of the scaling factor is 1.06. National authorities will continue to monitor capital
requirements during the implementation period of this Framework. Moreover, the Committee will monitor
national experiences with this Framework. 13C. Transitional arrangements
45. For banks using the IRB approach for credit risk or the Advanced Measurement
Approaches (AMA) for operational risk, there will be a capital floor following implementation of this Framework. Banks must calculate the difference between (i) the floor as defined in paragraph 46 and (ii) the amount as calculated according to paragraph 47. If the floor amount is larger, banks are required to add 12.5 times the difference to risk-weighted assets.46. The capital floor is based on application of the 1988 Accord. It is derived by applying
an adjustment factor to the following amount: (i) 8% of the risk-weighted assets, (ii) plus Tier1 and Tier 2 deductions, and (iii) less the amount of general provisions that may be
recognised in Tier 2. The adjustment factor for banks using the foundation IRB approach for the year beginning year-end 2006 is 95%. The adjustment factor for banks using (i) either the foundation and/or advanced IRB approaches, and/or (ii) the AMA for the year beginning year-end 2007 is 90%, and for the year beginning year-end 2008 is 80%. The following table illustrates the application of the adjustment factors. Additional transitional arrangements including parallel calculation are set out in paragraphs 263 to 269.From year-end
2005 From year-end
2006 From year-end
2007 From year-end
2008Foundation IRB
approach 12Parallel
calculation 95% 90% 80%Advanced
approaches for credit and/or operational risk Parallel calculation or impact studies Parallel calculation 90% 80%47. In the years in which the floor applies, banks must also calculate (i) 8% of total risk-
weighted assets as calculated under this Framework, (ii) less the difference between total provisions and expected loss amount as described in Section III.G (see paragraphs 374 to386), and (iii) plus other Tier 1 and Tier 2 deductions. Where a bank uses the standardised
approach to credit risk for any portion of its exposures, it also needs to exclude general provisions that may be recognised in Tier 2 for that portion from the amount calculated according to the first sentence of this paragraph.48. Should problems emerge during this period, the Committee will seek to take
appropriate measures to address them, and, in particular, will be prepared to keep the floors in place beyond 2009 if necessary.49. The Committee believes it is appropriate for supervisors to apply prudential floors to
banks that adopt the IRB approach for credit risk and/or the AMA for operational risk following year-end 2008. For banks that do not complete the transition to these approaches in the years specified in paragraph 46, the Committee believes it is appropriate for supervisors to continue to apply prudential floors - similar to those of paragraph 46 - to provide time to ensure that individual bank implementations of the advanced approaches are sound. However, the Committee recognises that floors based on the 1988 Accord will become increasingly impractical to implement over time and therefore believes that supervisors should have the flexibility to develop appropriate bank-by-bank floors that are 12 The foundation IRB approach includes the IRB approach to retail. 14 consistent with the principles outlined in this paragraph, subject to full disclosure of the nature of the floors adopted. Such floors may be based on the approach the bank was using before adoption of the IRB approach and/or AMA.Ia. The constituents of capital
A. Core capital (basic equity or Tier 1)
49(i). The Committee considers that the key element of capital on which the main
emphasis should be placed is equity capital 13 and disclosed reserves. This key element of capital is the only element common to all countries' banking systems; it is wholly visible in the published accounts and is the basis on which most market judgements of capital adequacy are made; and it has a crucial bearing on profit margins and a bank's ability to compete. This emphasis on equity capital and disclosed reserves reflects the importance the Committee attaches to securing an appropriate quality, and the level, of the total capital resources maintained by major banks.49(ii). Notwithstanding this emphasis, the member countries of the Committee also
consider that there are a number of other important and legitimate constituents of a bank's capital base which may be included within the system of measurement (subject to certain conditions set out in paragraphs 49(iv) to 49(xii) below).49(iii). The Committee has therefore concluded that capital, for supervisory purposes,
should be defined in two tiers in a way which will have the effect of requiring at least 50% of a bank's capital base to consist of a core element comprised of equity capital and published reserves from post-tax retained earnings (Tier 1). The other elements of capital (supplementary capital) will be admitted into Tier 2 limited to 100% of Tier 1. These supplementary capital elements and the particular conditions attaching to their inclusion in the capital base are set out in paragraphs 49(iv) to 49(xii) below and in more detail in Annex1a. Each of these elements may be included or not included by national authorities at their
discretion in the light of their national accounting and supervisory regulations.B. Supplementary capital (Tier 2)
1. Undisclosed reserves
49(iv). Unpublished or hidden reserves may be constituted in various ways according to
differing legal and accounting regimes in member countries. Under this heading are included only reserves which, though unpublished, have been passed through the profit and loss account and which are accepted by the bank's supervisory authorities. They may be inherently of the same intrinsic quality as published retained earnings, but, in the context of an internationally agreed minimum standard, their lack of transparency, together with the fact that many countries do not recognise undisclosed reserves, either as an accepted accounting concept or as a legitimate element of capital, argue for excluding them from the core equity capital element. 13 Issued and fully paid ordinary shares/common stock and non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock (but excluding cumulative preferred stock). 152. Revaluation reserves
49(v). Some countries, under their national regulatory or accounting arrangements, allow
certain assets to be revalued to reflect their current value, or something closer to their current value than historic cost, and the resultant revaluation reserves to be included in the capital base. Such revaluations can arise in two ways: (a) from a formal revaluation, carried through to the balance sheets of banks' own premises; or (b) from a notional addition to capital of hidden values which arise from the practice of holding securities in the balance sheet valued at historic costs. Such reserves may be included within supplementary capital provided that the assets are considered by the supervisory authority to be prudently valued, fully reflecting the possibility of price fluctuations and forced sale.49(vi). Alternative (b) in paragraph 49(v) above is relevant to those banks whose balance
sheets traditionally include very substantial amounts of equities held in their portfolio at historic cost but which can be, and on occasions are, realised at current prices and used to offset losses. The Committee considers these "latent" revaluation reserves can be included among supplementary elements of capital since they can be used to absorb losses on a going-concern basis, provided they are subject to a substantial discount in order to reflect concerns both about market volatility and about the tax charge which would arise were such cases to be realised. A discount of 55% on the difference between the historic cost book value and market value is agreed to be appropriate in the light of these considerations. The Committee considered, but rejected, the proposition that latent reserves arising in respect of the undervaluation of banks' premises should also be included within the definition of supplementary capital.3. General provisions/general loan-loss reserves
49(vii). General provisions or general loan-loss reserves are created against the possibility
of losses not yet identified. Where they do not reflect a known deterioration in the valuation of particular assets, these reserves qualify for inclusion in Tier 2 capital. Where, however, provisions or reserves have been created against identified losses or in respect of an identified deterioration in the value of any asset or group of subsets of assets, they are not freely available to meet unidentified losses which may subsequently arise elsewhere in the portfolio and do not possess an essential characteristic of capital. Such provisions or reserves should therefore not be included in the capital base.49(viii). The supervisory authorities represented on the Committee undertake to ensure that
the supervisory process takes due account of any identified deterioration in value. They will also ensure that general provisions or general loan-loss reserves will only be included in capital if they are not intended to deal with the deterioration of particular assets, whether individual or grouped.49(ix). This would mean that all elements in general provisions or general loan-loss
reserves designed to protect a bank from identified deterioration in the quality of specific assets (whether foreign or domestic) should be ineligible for inclusion in capital. In particular, elements that reflect identified deterioration in assets subject to country risk, in real estate lending and in other problem sectors would be excluded from capital.49(x). General provisions/general loan-loss reserves that qualify for inclusion in Tier 2
under the terms described above do so subject to a limit of 16 (a) 1.25 percentage points of weighted risk assets to the extent a bank uses theStandardised Approach for credit risk; and
(b) 0.6 percentage points of credit risk-weighted assets in accordance with paragraph43 to the extent a bank uses the IRB Approach for credit risk.
4. Hybrid debt capital instruments
49(xi). In this category fall a number of capital instruments which combine certain
characteristics of equity and certain characteristics of debt. Each of these has particular features which can be considered to affect its quality as capital. It has been agreed that, where these instruments have close similarities to equity, in particular when they are able to support losses on an on-going basis without triggering liquidation, they may be included in supplementary capital. In addition to perpetual preference shares carrying a cumulative fixed charge, the following instruments, for example, may qualify for inclusion: long-term preferredshares in Canada, titres participatifs and titres subordonnés à durée indéterminée in France,
Genussscheine in Germany, perpetual debt instruments in the United Kingdom and mandatory convertible debt instruments in the United States. The qualifying criteria for such instruments are set out in Annex 1a.