Instructor’s Notes for everything’s an argument

different types of argument There are two basic types of argument: (i) deductive arguments Can you say which arguments are deductive and which inductive: 1

The Five Types of Legal Argument - Carolina Academic Press

Chapter 11 · Intra-Type Attacks on Textual Arguments 97 A Intra-Type Attacks on Plain Meaning Arguments 97 1 The Text Is Ambiguous 97 2 The Text Has a Different Plain Meaning 100 B Intra-Type Attacks on the Canons of Construction 101 3 The Canon of Construction Does Not Apply 101 4 A Conﬂicting Canon of Construction Applies 102 C Intra-Type

1-D Types of Arguments - University of Utah

Types of Arguments 1-D I Inductive Reasoning specific premises general conclusion II Deductive Reasoning general premises specific conclusion Analyzing Arguments Sunday, August 30, 2009 4:59 PM 1 D Page 1

4 Types of Deductive Arguments - University of Arizona

4 Types of Deductive Arguments Modus Ponens All A’s are B’s This is an A ‹ This is a B Real world example: All Americans are rich (compared to people in the rest of the world);

Industry Rents: Evidence and Implications

and space, we consider in detail neoclassical arguments that, rather than representing labor market rents, these differentials can be explained by unmeasured labor quality and differences in

3 Types of Argument: Classical, Rogerian, Toulmin

that good, realistic arguments typically will consist of six parts He used these terms to describe the items 1 Data: The facts or evidence used to prove the argument 2 Claim: The statement being argued (a thesis) 3 Warrants: The general, hypothetical (and often implicit) logical statements that serve as bridges between the claim and the

How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and

arguments either according to whether the conclusion was necessary (assuming that the premises were true) or whether it was plausible The mode of judgement was explained in each condition by extensive task instructions Most participants in both conditions accepted valid arguments and

Vertical Integration and Firm Boundaries: The Evidence

have been different for these two sets of decisions Specifically, most of the empirical literature on firms’ decisions to integrate for-ward into retailing relies on incentive and moral-hazard type arguments, whereas the empirical literature on backward integration, otherwise known as the “make or buy” deci-