Revisiting the Einstein-Bohr Dialogue
Revisiting the Einstein-Bohr Dialogue Don Howard Einstein and Bohr – No names loom larger in the history of twentieth-century physics, and rightly so, Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr being the figures most prominently associated with the relativity and quantum revolutions 1 Their names dominate, likewise, the history of philosophical
The Bohr-Einstein dialogue : a rhetorical and genre analysis
present study examines the final phase of the Bohr-Einstein dialogue, in which Niels Bohr answers a challenge co-authored by Albert Einstein with a text that is, at once, generic enough to pass as a legitimate reply to Einstein and filled with unconventional generic forms borrowed from a neighbouring sphere of scientific activity
Chapter 4: Dialogue - Original Thinking
between Einstein and Bohr was a dialogue in which each listened deeply to what the other was saying for the purpose of understanding, not to persuade the other of the correctness of a particular belief If either Bohr or Einstein had been able to suspend their judgments and listen
Dokument1 - univieacat
The dialogue between Einstein and Bohr reached its culmination in 1935 with the publication of the famous Einstein-PodoIsky-Rosen paper, where the question whether quantum mechanics provides a complete description of physical reality was raised in a most succinct way 5 The novel states were called by Schrödinger
The Experiments of Einstein and Rupp on the Particle vs
“Dear Einstein”, Niels Bohr’s letter of 27 April 1927 begins, “[b]efore his holiday trip to the Bavarian mountains, Heisenberg asked me to send you a copy of the proofs that he was expecting, which he hoped might interest you ” Bohr sent Einstein the Albert proofs of Heisenberg’s article on the uncertainty relations
Dokument1 - univieacat
Ever since the famous Bohr-Einstein dialogue I it has been known that it is not pos- Sible in an interference experiment to have a maximum visibility interference pattern and path information at the same time This feature of quantum mechanics, neces- sary for its consistency, has been elevated by Feynman2 to a principle: whenever it is
How ideas became knowledge: The light-quantum hypothesis 1905
Isis, 58 (1967), 37–55 Martin J Klein, “The first phase of the Bohr-Einstein dialogue,” HSPS, 2 (1970), 1–39 Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach, Intellectual mastery of nature: Theoretical physics from Ohm to Einstein, vol 2, The now mighty theoretical physics 1870–1925 (Chicago, 1986) 4
PATH INFORMATION IN QUANTUM INTERFEROMETRY
Ever since the famous Bohr-Einstein dialogue, it has been known that it is not pos sible in an interference experiment to have a maximum visibility interference pattern and path information at the same time This feature of quantum mechanics, neces sary for its consistency, has been f:'evated by Feynman2 to a principle: whenever it is
[PDF] bell inequality
[PDF] dieu ne joue pas aux dés einstein
[PDF] intrication quantique expérience
[PDF] décohérence quantique pdf
[PDF] paradoxe epr
[PDF] intrication quantique
[PDF] alain aspect prix nobel
[PDF] ens cachan
[PDF] non localité quantique
[PDF] bohm bijoux
[PDF] paradoxe epr pour les nuls
[PDF] mondialisation sur le plan politique
[PDF] la mondialisation politique pdf
[PDF] l'aspect politique de la mondialisation