Biometric data is digital data stored as 1s and 0s
Once saved, they can be copied into backup files and stored on servers anywhere in the world.
The risk is if access to one of the servers is compromised, these files and the biometric data they contain can be stolen and copied without anyone noticing..
For example, using biometric information technologies to identify consumers in certain locations could reveal sensitive personal information about them such as whether they accessed particular types of healthcare, attended religious services, or attended political or union meetings.May 18, 2023.
Privacy and confidentiality are also issues with deep ethical implications.
If privacy means having control over how and when we are represented to others, then biometrics that uniquely identifies us might easily be encroaching on our fundamental privacy..
Right now, only a handful of states have biometric legislation in place, and each law differs vastly in how it defines “biometric information” as well as how entities can collect, use, and retain this data.
Importantly, only two states (Illinois and California) let individuals confront biometric data abusers without the Attorney General initiating .
While it was once a novelty, biometric authentication no longer surprises us.
Hundreds of millions of people now use biometrics daily to unlock their devices or sign into workplaces without giving the technology a second thought.
However, as our acceptance of biometric scanning grows, tech companies are finding new uses for the technology behind it.
While the use of biometric technology is not designed for the invasion of privacy, in many cases, the way the digital data is produced, stored, compared and possibly linked to other information about the individual raise serious concerns for the blurring boundaries between privacy and security and security and surveillance.
And it should certainly require that all biometric data be stored in the most secure manner possible.
Identity theft, fraud and terrorism are real problems.
Used properly, biometrics could help protect against them.
But the potential for misuse is glaringly obvious.
We must begin setting rules to govern the use of these technologies now.
Against the growing threat that biometric data abuse poses for customers, there currently isn’t a single comprehensive federal law governing the collection and use of biometric data in the U.S.
However, that is not to say that federal lawmakers are not interested in passing one.
Introduced last year, the National Biometric Information Privacy Act o.
Failing to assess foreseeable harms to consumers before collecting biometric information; Failing to promptly address known or foreseeable risks and identify and implement tools for reducing or eliminating those risks; Engaging in surreptitious and unexpected collection or use of biometric information; .
Misinterpretation of statistical significance
