"Terrorism" is also expressly not permitted by article 33 Geneva Convention IV which prohibits "all measures of intimidation or of terrorism" as part of collective punishment, which could induce a state of terror, as well as by article 4(2)(d) Additional Protocol II which simply prohibits "at any time and in any place
Does the Geneva Convention apply to terrorists?
"Terrorism" is also expressly not permitted by article 33 Geneva Convention IV which prohibits "all measures of intimidation or of terrorism" as part of collective punishment, which could induce a state of terror, as well as by article 4(2)(d) Additional Protocol II which simply prohibits "at any time and in any place .
What are the targeted killings by Israel defense forces?
Notable targeted killings by the Israeli military were Hamas leaders Mahmoud Adani (February 2001), Jamil Jadallah (October 2001), Mahmoud Abu Hanoud (November 2001), Salah Shahade (July 2002), Ibrahim al-Makadmeh (March 2003), Ismail Abu Shanab (August 2003), Ahmed Yassin (March 2004), Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi (April .
What is the Geneva Convention for wilful killing?
A killing of one or more persons, who were protected under the Geneva Conventions of 1949, the perpetrator knew of the factual circumstances establishing that protection, the conduct was associated with an international armed conflict..
What is the international humanitarian law and prohibition of terrorism?
IHL prohibits in war most acts that would be called "terrorist" if committed in peacetime. In this context, IHL applies both to armed forces and to non-State armed groups. Acts of terrorism in other situations may be subject to other bodies of law, in particular domestic criminal law. What does IHL say about terrorism?.
What is the meaning of target killing?
The intentional and pre-meditated use of lethal force, by a State or organized armed group against a specific individual outside their physical custody. Targeted killings occur both within and outside of armed conflicts..
What is the rule 89 of the IHL?
The prohibition of “arbitrary deprivation of the right to life” under human rights law, however, also encompasses unlawful killing in the conduct of hostilities, i.e., the killing of civilians and persons hors de combat not in the power of a party to the conflict not justified under the rules on the conduct of .
IHL prohibits in war most acts that would be called "terrorist" if committed in peacetime. In this context, IHL applies both to armed forces and to non-State armed groups. Acts of terrorism in other situations may be subject to other bodies of law, in particular domestic criminal law. What does IHL say about terrorism?
States are bound (1) to refrain from resorting to terrorism and (2) to do everything in their power to prevent terrorist acts from being committed by individuals or in territory under their jurisdiction.
The prohibition of “arbitrary deprivation of the right to life” under human rights law, however, also encompasses unlawful killing in the conduct of hostilities, i.e., the killing of civilians and persons hors de combat not in the power of a party to the conflict not justified under the rules on the conduct of
Melzer defines targeted killing as a use of lethal force by a subject of international law that is directed against an individually selected person who is not in custody and that is intentional (rather than negligent or reckless), premeditated (rather than merely voluntary), and deliberate (meaning that ' the death of
Targeted killings. Targeted killings. The intentional and pre-meditated use of MELZER Nils, Targeted Killing in International Law, Oxford, OUP, 2008, 468 pp.
The neutral term “targeted killing” will be preferred to the expression “targeted assassination”, because assassination is generally understood as the killing
Are targeted attacks on alleged anti-US militants legal?
In asserting that targeted attacks on alleged anti-US militants anywhere in the world are lawful, the US undermines the international rules it helped craft over the past half-century that bar extra-legal killings.
Does Interstate force apply to targeted killings?
It also addresses the relevance of the law of interstate force to targeted killings, and the interrelation of the various normative frameworks which may simultaneously apply to operations involving the use of lethal force. The book shows in what circumstances targeted killings may be considered as internationally lawful.
What is targeted killing in international law?
Targeted Killing in International Law is a book about the legality of targeted killing, written by Nils Melzer. It was first published by Oxford University Press in May 2008.
When was targeted killing first published?
It was first published by Oxford University Press in May 2008. The book explores the history of targeted killing as a government strategy by multiple countries including:
the United States
the United Kingdom
Israel
Switzerland and Germany; for both military and law enforcement purposes.
Are targeted killing during hostilities legal?
In order to be lawful, targeted killing during hostilities has to comply with the rules of international humanitarian law, or the LOAC
Its legal sources are the Geneva Conventions of 1949, its two Additional Protocols, the 1907 Hague Regulations, and the customary law principles of armed conflict
Does Interstate force apply to targeted killings?
It also addresses the relevance of the law of interstate force to targeted killings, and the interrelation of the various normative frameworks which may simultaneously apply to operations involving the use of lethal force
The book shows in what circumstances targeted killings may be considered as internationally lawful
What is targeted killing?
As a form of individualized or surgical warfare, the method of targeted killing requires a ‘microscopic’ interpretation of the law regulating the conduct of hostilities which leads to nuanced results reflecting the fundamental principles underlying international humanitarian law
The United States adopted targeted killing as an essential tactic to pursue those responsible for the terrorist attacks of Se…
International law targeted killing
Intentional and unlawful killings of individuals by state actors without judicial process
An extrajudicial killing is the deliberate killing of a person without the lawful authority granted by a judicial proceeding. It typically refers to government authorities, whether lawfully or unlawfully, targeting specific people for death, which in authoritarian regimes often involves political, trade union, dissident, religious and social figures. The term is typically used in situations that imply the human rights of the victims have been violated; deaths caused by legal police actions or legal warfighting on a battlefield are generally not included, even though military and police forces are often used for killings seen by critics as illegitimate. The label extrajudicial killing has also been applied to organized, lethal enforcement of extralegal social norms by non-government actors, including lynchings and honor killings.
Targeted killing
Removal of enemy combatants by governments against enemy forces.
Targeted killing is a form of assassination carried out by governments outside a judicial procedure or a battlefield.
Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World
2012 book edited by Claire Finkelstein, Jens David Ohlin, and Andrew Altman
Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World is a non-fiction compilation book about targeted killing edited by Claire Finkelstein, Jens David Ohlin, and Andrew Altman. It was published by Oxford University Press in 2012. The book grew out of contributions by the authors to a conference in April 2011 at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Targeted Killings features eighteen essays in five sections arranged by topic. The work argues that after the 11 September attacks by Al-Qaeda in 2001, the United States and other countries began to see the tactic of targeted killing differently. The practice of targeted killing had previously been accepted in situations of self-defence in military settings; after 11 September 2001 it was used to kill non-combatants and those not directly involved in a particular armed force.
Targeted killings in Pakistan have been a rising form of violence
Targeted killings in Pakistan have been a rising form of violence and have contributed to security instability in the country. They have become common and have gained attention especially in Karachi, Pakistan's largest city, economic capital and capital city of the Sindh province. Several targeted killings have also occurred in Quetta, the capital of the southern province of Balochistan. Police and law enforcement agencies have sometimes come under criticism for their ineffectiveness in locating the perpetrators and investigating their motives. For most part, targeted killings in Karachi have been attributed to political, religious and ethnic reasons. There are speculations about the killing but no real proof has been found against any party.
Part of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Targeted killing, targeted prevention, or assassination is a tactic that has been repeatedly used by the Israel Defense Forces or other Israeli organisations in the course of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the Iran–Israel proxy conflict or other conflicts.
