Summary.
Kant named the three main sorts of argument for God's existence “ontological,” “cosmological,” and “teleological.” All three sorts were deployed in the Middle Ages..
A serious problem for the cosmological argument is the presence of a “gap” between the sort of being that the argument establishes (e.g., a first cause, a necessary cause) and the classical theistic conception of God (i.e., a being that is a necessary first cause, but is also omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent and .
The ontological argument for the existence of God is a classical Christian argument that contends that the very concept of God logically and necessarily demands existence.
It is the argument that, if one understands what is meant by the word “God” and follows it out to the logical conclusion, it is impossible for such a being not to exist.
The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things all things that exist.
In other words, there cannot be an infinite number of causes that go back in time forever.
Basically, this would mean there was no first cause, and without a first cause, there is no second, or third, or fourth, etc.
There are quite a few arguments that support the existence of God or a divine creator, specifically in the monotheistic religions; however, the most persuasive ones are mainly the cosmological argument and the theological argument.
The cosmological argument for God's existence is that things and beings simply exist, and the..
Thus, a cosmological argument for the existence of God will study the order of things or examine why things are the way they are in order to demonstrate the existence of God.
For Aristotle, the existence of the universe needs an explanation, as it could not have come from nothing.
There needs to be a cause for the universe.
Philosophical argument that asserts an inconsistency with nonbelief and God's existence
