Bioethics on stem cell
- 1.
Destruction of embryos - what defines life? How are stem cells a bioethical issue?
The research on embryonic stem cells is considered as illegal by some bioethicist because its isolation causes the destruction, discard and risk of injury or death of an embryo..
What are the bioethical issues with stem cells?
The research on embryonic stem cells is considered as illegal by some bioethicist because its isolation causes the destruction, discard and risk of injury or death of an embryo..
What are the ethical issues with stem cells?
Current ethical controversies regarding stem cell-based therapy are focused on the unlimited differentiation potential of iPSCs which can be used in human cloning, as a risk for generation of human embryos and human-animal chimeras..
Why does stem cell therapy have ethical and moral issues?
The use of donated embryos to produce ES cells
If the embryo is so considered, then it will be morally impermissible to use it merely as a means to an end, rather than as an end in itself.
This would preclude both embryo research and any other procedure not directed to the benefit of that actual embryo..
- In the case of embryonic stem cell research, it is impossible to respect both moral principles.To obtain embryonic stem cells, the early embryo has to be destroyed.
This means destroying a potential human life. - One of the common ethical issues in regenerative medicine is progress in 'componentation' (= being treated as parts) of the human body, and the enhancement of the view of such "human body parts." 'Componentation' of the human body represents a preliminary step toward commodification of the human body.
- Since an embryo is regarded as a human being with morally obligated rights, the Principle of Beneficence is violated, and the autonomy and welfare of the embryo is not respected due to the destruction of an embryo in stem cell research.
Abstract. Discussion of the bioethics of human stem cell research has transitioned from controversies over the source of human embryonic stem cells to concerns AbstractThe past: embryo ethicsThe future: toward the clinic
Discussion of the bioethics of human stem cell research has transitioned from controversies over the source of human embryonic stem cells to concerns about AbstractThe past: embryo ethicsThe future: toward the clinic
What's so bad about stem cell research?
The main ethical objections are to human embryonic stem cell research, because early-stage human embryos are destroyed during the process of deriving their stem cells.
Why are people against stem cell research?
Some opponents of stem cell research argue that it offends human dignity or harms or destroys human life.
Proponents argue that easing suffering and disease promotes human dignity and happiness,..
Stem cell tourism, a form of medical tourism, is the internet based-industry in which stem cell procedures are advertised to the public as a proven cure.
In the majority of cases, it leads to patients and families traveling abroad to obtain procedures that are not proven, nor part of a clinical trial approved by an authority like the Food and Drug Administration in the United States.
These procedures have not gone through the vetting process of clinical research and they lack rigorous scientific support.
Although for the general public, this advertising in glossy websites, may sound authoritative, for translational doctors and scientists this leads to the exploitation of vulnerable patients.
These procedures lack the reproducibility, the rigor that is required for successful development of new effective medications.
Although the term may imply traveling overseas, in recent years, there has been an explosion of stem cell clinics' in the US which has been well documented.
These activities are highly profitable for the clinic but no benefit for the patients, sometimes experiencing complications like spinal tumors, death, or financial ruin, all of which are documented in the scientific literature.
There is a great deal of interest in educating the public and patients, families and doctors who deal with patients requesting stem cells clinics.
In recent years, the FDA has become more active in overseeing stem cell clinics, taking a number of concrete steps including sending warning letters, putting out advisories, and in two cases filing suit in federal court to impose permanent injunctions on specific clinic firms.
Stem cell tourism, a form of medical tourism, is the internet based-industry in which stem cell procedures are advertised to the public as a proven cure.
In the majority of cases, it leads to patients and families traveling abroad to obtain procedures that are not proven, nor part of a clinical trial approved by an authority like the Food and Drug Administration in the United States.
These procedures have not gone through the vetting process of clinical research and they lack rigorous scientific support.
Although for the general public, this advertising in glossy websites, may sound authoritative, for translational doctors and scientists this leads to the exploitation of vulnerable patients.
These procedures lack the reproducibility, the rigor that is required for successful development of new effective medications.
Although the term may imply traveling overseas, in recent years, there has been an explosion of stem cell clinics' in the US which has been well documented.
These activities are highly profitable for the clinic but no benefit for the patients, sometimes experiencing complications like spinal tumors, death, or financial ruin, all of which are documented in the scientific literature.
There is a great deal of interest in educating the public and patients, families and doctors who deal with patients requesting stem cells clinics.
In recent years, the FDA has become more active in overseeing stem cell clinics, taking a number of concrete steps including sending warning letters, putting out advisories, and in two cases filing suit in federal court to impose permanent injunctions on specific clinic firms.
