9 août 2015 · Many electromagnets have an advantage over permanent magnets because they can be easily turned on and off, and increasing or decreasing the
Describe the relationship between electricity and magnetism • Compare an electromagnet to a bar magnet ENERGY USE AND DELIVERY – LESSON PLAN 3 3
If a long bar magnet is cut in half, each half becomes a complete magnet Solenoid magnets have several advantages over permanent magnets
The economical advantages of electromagnetic forming are the short cycle times In this case losses by diffusion of the magnetic field through the sheet
through the coil, it produces a magnetic field which magnetizes the core into the bar magnet with the polarities Strong magnetic field is obtained by high
Small bar magnet 0 01 Tesla through that hole due to the earth's magnetic field Some Units and Conversion Numbers in Electromagnetism Magnetic
![[PDF] Magnet Design - ICTP [PDF] Magnet Design - ICTP](https://pdfprof.com/EN_PDFV2/Docs/PDF_3/2976_30.pdf.jpg)
2976_30.pdf
Magnet Design
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Accelerator Technologies, Basic
Instruments and Analytical Techniques
21 -29 October 2019
Trieste Italy
Lowry Conradie
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 -29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
MAGNETS1.Introduction
Magnets in everyday life, in history,
Understanding magnetism, Glossary,
Units
2. General Principles of magnets
Type, number of poles, Field shapes
Pole shape, Fringe fields, Saturation,
Shims, Field quality, Magneto-motive
force
3. Magneto-motive force
Dipole and Quadrupole
4.Magnetization of iron
Hysteresis, permeability, materials
6.Magnet design
Computer programs
Steps in designing a magnet
Design a magnet (example -tutorial)
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
Magnets in Everyday Life
Rubber mat magnets
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
Accelerators mainly electromagnets.
Dipoles for bending a charged particle beam
Quadrupoles for focusing a beam
Sextupoles, octupoles, etcfor higher order beam corrections Fast deflecting magnets for beam injection and extraction Permanent magnets in vacuum pumps, gauges and sweeping devices, but nowadays also as beam optical devices
Particle detectors
Magnets in Everyday Life
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
How strong are magnets?
Typical Values
Here is a list of how strong some magnetic fields can be: Smallest value in a magnetically shielded room10-14Tesla
Interstellar space10-10Tesla
Earth's magnetic field0.00005 Tesla= 0.5 Gauss
Small bar magnet0.01 Tesla
Within a sunspot0.15 Tesla
Small NIB magnet0.2 Tesla
Big electromagnet2Tesla
Surface of neutron star100,000,000 Tesla
Magstar100,000,000,000 Tesla
What is a Tesla?It is a unit of magnetic flux density.It is also equivalent to these other units:
1 weber per square meter
10,000 Gauss (10 kilogauss)
10,000 magnetic field lines per square centimeter
65,000 magnetic field lines per square inch.
1Gauss is about 6.5 magnetic field lines per square inch.
If you place the tip of your index finger to the tip of your thumb, enclosing approximately 1 square inch, four magnetic field lines would pass
through that hole due to the earth's magnetic field! Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
Charged Particle properties
Particle energy : 1eV= (1.6x10-19C)(1V) = 1.6x10-19J Current iin ampere (A), current density jin (A/m2)
Number of conductor turns in a coil is N
Magnetic Field Strength H: 1 Oe= (103/4) A/m= 79.58 A/m (mmf)
Magnetic Flux : 1 Wb= 1 Vs
Magnetic Flux Density B: 104G= 1Wb/m2= 1Vs/m2= 1T Permeability of any material = = 0r (unit =Vs/Am=H/m) Permeability of vacuum = = 0r= (4x 10-7) x 1= 4x 10-7H/m Some Units and Conversion Numbers in Electromagnetism Magnetic Flux Density in relation to its magneto-motive force (mmf): B= H Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
TYPES OF MAGNETISM
A.DIAMAGNETISM
due to the modification of the electron orbit magnetic moment by an external field (a pure orbit effect)
Present in all materials, independent of temperature
Shows no hysteresis
Very weak
B.PARAMAGNETISM
atoms present a permanent magnetic moment, e.g. odd number of electrons (mostly an electron spin effect) Incomplete inner electronic shells (transition and rare earth elements) Can be orders of magnitude bigger than diamagnetism
No hysteresis effect
C.FERROMAGNETISM
Larger inter-atomic distances
Electron spin effect line up from atom to atom polarization -shell free to wander between atoms Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
TYPES OF MAGNETS
A.Permanent Magnets (magneto-motive force from intrinsic material properties) B.Electro-magnets (magneto-motive force generated from applied electric current)
DC-current
AC-current (pulsed, eddy-currents, laminations)
Super-conducting electro-magnets and materials
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy NS N S
VISUAL PERCEPTION -
FIELD LINES
Permanent Magnets : Field Shape
GENERAL RULES FOR USING LINES TO
VISUALIZE MAGNET FIELDS
1.Any line (all lines) must close on itself
or end according to a specified boundary condition.
2.Lines may NOT cross or touch.
3.Lines usuallycross an air/iron interface
perpendicularly.
4.The higher the field density, the denser
the line representation. .B = 0
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29
October 2019 Trieste Italy
Electro-Magnets : n = 2, 4, 6, etc. poles
Dipolefor bending/steering a beam
Quadrupolefor focussing/defocussing a beam
Higher ordersfor creating magnetic bottles,
beam profile shaping and corrections to inadequate fields from other magnets
Combinations, active and passive components
C Magnet
Advantages:
Easy asses
Simple design
Disadvantages:
Pole shims needed
Field asymmetric
Less rigid
H Magnet
Advantages
Symmetric
Rigid
Disadvantage:
Need shims
Difficult to access
Window frame Magnet
Advantages:
No shims
Symmetric
Compact
Rigid
Disadvantages:
Access problems
Insulation thickness
Different Dipole geometries
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
Electro-Magnets : Pole Shape
R y x xy=+R2/2 }g/2 y 0
For normal fields:
Dipole:
Y= ±g/2;
(g is pole gap).
Quadrupole:
xy= ±R2/2; (R is radius of pole opening).
Sextupole:
3x2y -y3=±R3;
Equations of ideal pole shape
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
Electro-Magnets : Field Shape
R y x xy=+R2/2 }g/2 y 0 Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy 14 Electro-Magnets : Fringe Fields & Field Saturation
Magnetic field distribution and
magnet ends
Control of the longitudinal field at magnet ends
Square ends:
Display non linear effects due to saturation
Influence the radial distribution in the fringe field
Chamfered ends:
Magnetic length better define
Prevent saturation
Control of the longitudinal field at magnet ends
MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE : DIPOLE MAGNET
กH.dl= NI (ampere-turns)
NI = กH.dl= (Hair.gair+ Hiron.liron) ;
H=B/
NI = กB/.dl= Bair.gair/0+ Biron.liron/iron
neglect 2ndterm with ironabout 5000 larger then`0
NI = Bair.g/0
0 = 4x 10-7(webers/amperemeter)
Electrical power P = I2R0 g2
R0= L/A,
with= resistivity of conductor material
L= length of the conductor and Athe
crossectionalarea of the coil gair B liron x x Saturation effect : keep field in yoke < 1.5 T by providing enough area of steel. Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
Quadrupole with hyperbolic pole faces
and with aperture a, such that the field at radius rfrom the axis is B(r)=K.r
H.dl= NI (ampere-turns)
NI = H.dl= (ೌೝ
ఓబgair+ ೝ ఓబఓೝliron) ;
NI = 0
a
B(r)/0.dr+ (iron path)
+ (path perpendicular to field)
Onthefirstpath(red)B(r)=K.r/ȝ0.The
secondintegral(green)isverysmallfor
ȝr>>1.Thethirdintegral(blue)
vanishessinceBisperpendiculartothe directionofintegration,ds.Sowegetin goodNI
NI = (1/0) 0
aKr.dr
NI= (1/0) Ka2/2, but Ka= Bpoletip
NI = (Bpoletip.a)/(20 )
Power (I)2a4
MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE : QUADRUPOLE MAGNET
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
MAGNETIZATION CURVE and PERMEABILITY
B = H = 0 rH
saturation B = H r= 0B/H Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy Relative permeabilitiesµ= µ0µrс(4ʋdž10-7) µr
Substance Group type Relative permeability, µr
BismuthDiamagnetic 0.99983
Silver Diamagnetic 0.99998
Lead Diamagnetic 0.999983
CopperDiamagnetic 0.999991
WaterDiamagnetic 0.999991
VacuumNonmagnetic 1+
Air Paramagnetic 1.0000004
Aluminium Paramagnetic 1.00002
PalladiumParamagnetic 1.0008
2-81 Permalloy powder (2 Mo, 81 Ni) ΐFerromagnetic 130
Cobalt Ferromagnetic 250
Nickel Ferromagnetic 600
Ferroxcube 3 (Mn-Zn-ferrite powder)Ferromagnetic 1,500
Mild steel (0.2 C)Ferromagnetic 2,000
Iron (0.2 impurity)Ferromagnetic 5,000
Silicon iron (4 Si)Ferromagnetic 7,000
78 Permalloy (78.5 Ni)Ferromagnetic 100,00
Mumetal (75 Ni, 5 Cu, 2 Cr)Ferromagnetic 100,000
Purified iron (0.05 impurity)Ferromagnetic 200,000 Superalloy (5 Mo, 79 Ni)ΐFerromagnetic 1,000,000
Magnetic Materials: relative permeability
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
Permanent magnets defined by curve in 2nd
quadrant
HYSTERESIS
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
SOME USEFUL GUIDES FOR DESIGN OF
CONVENTIONAL MAGNETS
A.Magnet steel begins to saturate around 1.5 T
B.Coils with current density < 1 A/mm2may not need cooling C.Max. current density for normal water cooled conductor is < 10 A/mm2
D.Water flow should be turbulent (v > 1.5-2 m/s)
E.Know the price of Power consumption
F.Cost of putting magnet into service (measurement, installation, cables, power supply) is the same as the capital cost of the magnet Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
COMPUTER PROGRAMS for MAGNET DESIGN
2d : POISSON / SUPERFISH & OPERA-2d
¼ Geometry of H-type Dipole Magnet
pole
Return
yoke coil
Finite elements
Magnetic flux lines
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
COMPUTER PROGRAMS for MAGNET DESIGN
3d : OPERA-3d (Pre-and Post-Processor, TOSCA, ELEKTRA,
SOPRANO, Geometric Modeller, SCALA,
CONCERTO, TEMPO)
COIL YOKE
POLESSHIMS
COIL Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
COMPUTER PROGRAMS for MAGNET DESIGN
3d : OPERA-3d (Pre-and Post-Processor, TOSCA, ELEKTRA,
SOPRANO, Geometric Modeller, SCALA,
CONCERTO, TEMPO)
Magnetic flux in the iron
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
DESIGNING A BENDING MAGNET
SOURCE
TARGET
Assignment: Design a 90-degree bending magnet for beam analysis with the duoplasmatronion source and injection into an accelerator.
The magnet must adhere to the following requirements: Bending angle = 90 degrees, Radius of curvature = 220 mm
Pole gap = 70 mm, Beam width in pole gap 40 mm
Maximum energy of protons injected into the accelerator = 20 keV
Maximum current by power supply is 6 A
Therefore : Calculate the main parameters
of the magnet that will transfer the beam from the source to the target. rigidity and magnetic flux density maximum B field pole width (homogenity of the field) thickness of iron yoke the mmf the number of coil turns voltage and power at a max. 6 A Then: Measure and calculate the excitation curve, effective length and field homogenity Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy
MAGNET DESIGN : POLE WIDTH
0.01x pole beam
0.001x
Pole width, w = x + ?
Pole gap, g ??
And for a variation of less than 0.1% it becomes
If the horizontal beam diameter is about 40 mm
then the minimum pole gap width can be computed within 0.1% variation in the magnetic flux density region across the beam width, using the above relation, is And for a maximum variation of 1% the pole width is
0.0012 2 70 40 180w g x mm mm mm 0.0170 40 110w g x mm mm mm
For a magnet with a pole width wand gapg the width Ʃx0.01over which the field varies less than 1%, is more of less given by:
οݔǤଵൌݓെ݃ οݔǤଵൌݓെ-݃ Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy 26
Shims for dipole magnet to improve the
uniformity of magnetic field
Shim Area؆
Shim area = s x d
With 0.2ݏȀ݃-Ǥ
݃ൌpole gap
w= width of pole s = width of shim d = height of shim MAGNET DESIGN : MAGNETIC RIGIDITY, FLUX DENSITY, YOKE THICKNESS
Foraparticlewithchargeq,massmandspeedvmovingina
uniform,time-independentmagneticfield,B,onacircularorbitwith radiusofcurvature,,atarightangletotheuniformmagneticfield, theLorentzforceequaltothecentrifugalforce:
2mvqvB mv
qB Themomentum,mv,can,foragivenchargeq,beexpressedbythe productB.TheproductBiscalledthemagneticrigidityofthe particleandisadirectmeasureofthemomentum.The expressionrelatingthetotalenergyEandthemomentumpofa particleis:
2 2 2 2 2E p c m c
Using the energy relations
0kE E E2E mc
and with c= speed of light,
E0= the rest energy of the particle
Ek= the kinetic energy of the particle
2
02kkE E EBQc
and with an absolute charge state
Qand energy in eV, it becomes
2
02kkE E EmvBq qc
The rigidity (in SI-units)
The magnetic rigidity of a 20 keVproton (maximum injection energy), is
0.0204B Tm
Withtheradiusofthemagnetknown(theradiuswasfixedbythe doublefocusingdistance)themaximumfluxdensityforthemagnet is:
0.02040.09270.22
TmBTm If we assume thatsaturation will only be reached when the magnetic flux density in the iron is about 1.2 T, and that the flux that passes through the iron is the same as that which passes through the pole gap, the following calculation can be used to determine the minimum thickness of the iron yokepieces. Magnetic flux through air (pole gap) = Magnetic flux through iron g g i iA B y A B where,
Ag=crosssectionalareaofthepolegap,
Ai=crosssectionalareaoftheironyoke,
Bg=magneticfluxdensityinthepolegap,
Bi=magneticfluxdensityintheironyoke,
y=numberofyokepiecesforclosingofthemagneticfluxloop, whichisdeterminedbythemagnetshape(i.e.y=1foraC-magnet andy=2foranH-magnet) Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy MAGNET DESIGN : YOKE THICKNESS, MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE
Thepath-length,L,ofa900circularbendisgivenby:
2 2 22034644
mmL mm D U u | Assuming a H-shape magnet, the minimum thickness of the yoke pieces can thus be calculated as follows: 2 gg i ii
ABThicknessB length
u u
346 110 0.0927
346 2 1.2
mm mm T mm T u u4.3mm
The yoke thickness was chosen, a practical 20 mm.
Tocreatethemagneticfieldinthemagnetacertainmagneto- motiveforce(mmf)percentimeterlength(orfieldstrength) thatwillgivethemaximumfluxdensitythroughthemagnet hastobeapplied.Therequiredmmfisgeneratedbythecoil windingsinthemagnetthroughwhichacurrentissent.
Followinglaw(theintegralofthemagneticfield
alongaclosedpathequalstheenclosedtotalcurrent):
H d l NI
where,
H=magneticintensityorthefieldstrengthinA/m,
N=numberofturnsinthewindings,
I=currentinAthroughthewindings.
2g g i i iiA B y A B length thickness B a b c d e g w It is assumed that the magnetic flux density in the iron is constant and the flux density between the poles is constant and that the direction of the field is parallel to the arrows of path a-b-c-d-e-g (as shown in the figure). The mmfis where, Hg= magnetic intensity in the air between the poles,
Hi= magnetic intensity in the iron,
l= a+ b + c+d+e, g= pole-gap. The relationship between the magnetic flux density Band magnetic intensity His glH g H l NI 0rBH glg H nH NI
Wherer=relativepermeabilityofthematerial,
And 0= permeability of free space.
With the path l= n xgit becomes
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy MAGNET DESIGN : MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE, MAXIMUM CURRENT, NUMBER OF COIL TURNS, CURRENT DENSITY, LENGTH OF COIL, COIL RESISTANCE, VOLTAGE, POWER CONSUMPTION
Themmfnowbecomes:
00 gi air iron
BnBg NI