[PDF] Magnet Design - ICTP




Loading...







[PDF] How Electromagnets Work

9 août 2015 · Many electromagnets have an advantage over permanent magnets because they can be easily turned on and off, and increasing or decreasing the 

[PDF] Electromagnets - North Georgia EMC

Describe the relationship between electricity and magnetism • Compare an electromagnet to a bar magnet ENERGY USE AND DELIVERY – LESSON PLAN 3 3

[PDF] magnet and magnetism - Georgia Standards

If a long bar magnet is cut in half, each half becomes a complete magnet Solenoid magnets have several advantages over permanent magnets

Effective electromagnetic forces in thin sheet metal specimen

The economical advantages of electromagnetic forming are the short cycle times In this case losses by diffusion of the magnetic field through the sheet 

[PDF] Improvement of Electromagnetic Braking System in Vehicles - IRJET

through the coil, it produces a magnetic field which magnetizes the core into the bar magnet with the polarities Strong magnetic field is obtained by high 

[PDF] Magnet Design - ICTP

Small bar magnet 0 01 Tesla through that hole due to the earth's magnetic field Some Units and Conversion Numbers in Electromagnetism Magnetic 

[PDF] Magnet Design - ICTP 2976_30.pdf

Magnet Design

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Accelerator Technologies, Basic

Instruments and Analytical Techniques

21 -29 October 2019

Trieste Italy

Lowry Conradie

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 -29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

MAGNETS1.Introduction

Magnets in everyday life, in history,

Understanding magnetism, Glossary,

Units

2. General Principles of magnets

Type, number of poles, Field shapes

Pole shape, Fringe fields, Saturation,

Shims, Field quality, Magneto-motive

force

3. Magneto-motive force

Dipole and Quadrupole

4.Magnetization of iron

Hysteresis, permeability, materials

6.Magnet design

Computer programs

Steps in designing a magnet

Design a magnet (example -tutorial)

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

Magnets in Everyday Life

Rubber mat magnets

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

‰Accelerators mainly electromagnets.

Dipoles for bending a charged particle beam

Quadrupoles for focusing a beam

Sextupoles, octupoles, etcfor higher order beam corrections Fast deflecting magnets for beam injection and extraction ‰Permanent magnets in vacuum pumps, gauges and sweeping devices, but nowadays also as beam optical devices

‰Particle detectors

Magnets in Everyday Life

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

How strong are magnets?

Typical Values

Here is a list of how strong some magnetic fields can be: Smallest value in a magnetically shielded room10-14Tesla

Interstellar space10-10Tesla

Earth's magnetic field0.00005 Tesla= 0.5 Gauss

Small bar magnet0.01 Tesla

Within a sunspot0.15 Tesla

Small NIB magnet0.2 Tesla

Big electromagnet2Tesla

Surface of neutron star100,000,000 Tesla

Magstar100,000,000,000 Tesla

What is a Tesla?It is a unit of magnetic flux density.It is also equivalent to these other units:

1 weber per square meter

10,000 Gauss (10 kilogauss)

10,000 magnetic field lines per square centimeter

65,000 magnetic field lines per square inch.

1Gauss is about 6.5 magnetic field lines per square inch.

If you place the tip of your index finger to the tip of your thumb, enclosing approximately 1 square inch, four magnetic field lines would pass

through that hole due to the earth's magnetic field! Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

‰Charged Particle properties

‰Particle energy : 1eV= (1.6x10-19C)(1V) = 1.6x10-19J ‰Current iin ampere (A), current density jin (A/m2)

‰Number of conductor turns in a coil is N

‰Magnetic Field Strength H: 1 Oe= (103/4) A/m= 79.58 A/m (mmf)

‰Magnetic Flux : 1 Wb= 1 Vs

‰Magnetic Flux Density B: 104G= 1Wb/m2= 1Vs/m2= 1T ‰Permeability of any material = = 0r (unit =Vs/Am=H/m) ‰Permeability of vacuum = = 0r= (4x 10-7) x 1= 4x 10-7H/m Some Units and Conversion Numbers in Electromagnetism Magnetic Flux Density in relation to its magneto-motive force (mmf): B= H Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

TYPES OF MAGNETISM

A.DIAMAGNETISM

due to the modification of the electron orbit magnetic moment by an external field (a pure orbit effect)

Present in all materials, independent of temperature

Shows no hysteresis

Very weak

B.PARAMAGNETISM

atoms present a permanent magnetic moment, e.g. odd number of electrons (mostly an electron spin effect) Incomplete inner electronic shells (transition and rare earth elements) Can be orders of magnitude bigger than diamagnetism

No hysteresis effect

C.FERROMAGNETISM

Larger inter-atomic distances

Electron spin effect line up from atom to atom polarization -shell free to wander between atoms Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

TYPES OF MAGNETS

A.Permanent Magnets (magneto-motive force from intrinsic material properties) B.Electro-magnets (magneto-motive force generated from applied electric current)

DC-current

AC-current (pulsed, eddy-currents, laminations)

Super-conducting electro-magnets and materials

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy NS N S

VISUAL PERCEPTION -

FIELD LINES

Permanent Magnets : Field Shape

GENERAL RULES FOR USING LINES TO

VISUALIZE MAGNET FIELDS

1.Any line (all lines) must close on itself

or end according to a specified boundary condition.

2.Lines may NOT cross or touch.

3.Lines usuallycross an air/iron interface

perpendicularly.

4.The higher the field density, the denser

the line representation. .B = 0

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29

October 2019 Trieste Italy

Electro-Magnets : n = 2, 4, 6, etc. poles

Dipolefor bending/steering a beam

Quadrupolefor focussing/defocussing a beam

Higher ordersfor creating magnetic bottles,

beam profile shaping and corrections to inadequate fields from other magnets

Combinations, active and passive components

C Magnet

Advantages:

Easy asses

Simple design

Disadvantages:

Pole shims needed

Field asymmetric

Less rigid

H Magnet

Advantages

Symmetric

Rigid

Disadvantage:

Need shims

Difficult to access

Window frame Magnet

Advantages:

No shims

Symmetric

Compact

Rigid

Disadvantages:

Access problems

Insulation thickness

Different Dipole geometries

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

Electro-Magnets : Pole Shape

R y x xy=+R2/2 }g/2 y 0

For normal fields:

Dipole:

Y= ±g/2;

(g is pole gap).

Quadrupole:

xy= ±R2/2; (R is radius of pole opening).

Sextupole:

3x2y -y3=±R3;

Equations of ideal pole shape

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

Electro-Magnets : Field Shape

R y x xy=+R2/2 }g/2 y 0 Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy 14 Electro-Magnets : Fringe Fields & Field Saturation

Magnetic field distribution and

magnet ends

Control of the longitudinal field at magnet ends

Square ends:

Display non linear effects due to saturation

Influence the radial distribution in the fringe field

Chamfered ends:

Magnetic length better define

Prevent saturation

Control of the longitudinal field at magnet ends

MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE : DIPOLE MAGNET

กH.dl= NI (ampere-turns)

NI = กH.dl= (Hair.gair+ Hiron.liron) ;

H=B/

NI = กB/.dl= Bair.gair/0+ Biron.liron/iron

neglect 2ndterm with ironabout 5000 larger then`0

NI = Bair.g/0

0 = 4x 10-7(webers/amperemeter)

Electrical power P = I2R0 g2

R0= L/A,

with= resistivity of conductor material

L= length of the conductor and Athe

crossectionalarea of the coil gair B liron x x Saturation effect : keep field in yoke < 1.5 T by providing enough area of steel. Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

Quadrupole with hyperbolic pole faces

and with aperture a, such that the field at radius rfrom the axis is B(r)=K.r

H.dl= NI (ampere-turns)

NI = H.dl= (஻ೌ೔ೝ

ఓబgair+ ஻೔ೝ೚೙ ఓబఓೝliron) ;

NI = 0 ෾

a

B(r)/0.dr+ (iron path)

+ (path perpendicular to field)

Onthefirstpath(red)B(r)=K.r/ȝ0.The

secondintegral(green)isverysmallfor

ȝr>>1.Thethirdintegral(blue)

vanishessinceBisperpendiculartothe directionofintegration,ds.Sowegetin goodNI

NI = (1/0) 0෾

aKr.dr

NI= (1/0) Ka2/2, but Ka= Bpoletip

NI = (Bpoletip.a)/(20 )

Power (I)2a4

MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE : QUADRUPOLE MAGNET

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

MAGNETIZATION CURVE and PERMEABILITY

B = H = 0 rH

saturation B = H r= 0B/H Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy Relative permeabilitiesµ= µ0µrс(4ʋdž10-7) µr

Substance Group type Relative permeability, µr

BismuthDiamagnetic 0.99983

Silver Diamagnetic 0.99998

Lead Diamagnetic 0.999983

CopperDiamagnetic 0.999991

WaterDiamagnetic 0.999991

VacuumNonmagnetic 1+

Air Paramagnetic 1.0000004

Aluminium Paramagnetic 1.00002

PalladiumParamagnetic 1.0008

2-81 Permalloy powder (2 Mo, 81 Ni) ΐFerromagnetic 130

Cobalt Ferromagnetic 250

Nickel Ferromagnetic 600

Ferroxcube 3 (Mn-Zn-ferrite powder)Ferromagnetic 1,500

Mild steel (0.2 C)Ferromagnetic 2,000

Iron (0.2 impurity)Ferromagnetic 5,000

Silicon iron (4 Si)Ferromagnetic 7,000

78 Permalloy (78.5 Ni)Ferromagnetic 100,00

Mumetal (75 Ni, 5 Cu, 2 Cr)Ferromagnetic 100,000

Purified iron (0.05 impurity)Ferromagnetic 200,000 Superalloy (5 Mo, 79 Ni)ΐFerromagnetic 1,000,000

Magnetic Materials: relative permeability

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

Permanent magnets defined by curve in 2nd

quadrant

HYSTERESIS

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

SOME USEFUL GUIDES FOR DESIGN OF

CONVENTIONAL MAGNETS

A.Magnet steel begins to saturate around 1.5 T

B.Coils with current density < 1 A/mm2may not need cooling C.Max. current density for normal water cooled conductor is < 10 A/mm2

D.Water flow should be turbulent (v > 1.5-2 m/s)

E.Know the price of Power consumption

F.Cost of putting magnet into service (measurement, installation, cables, power supply) is the same as the capital cost of the magnet Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

COMPUTER PROGRAMS for MAGNET DESIGN

2d : POISSON / SUPERFISH & OPERA-2d

¼ Geometry of H-type Dipole Magnet

pole

Return

yoke coil

Finite elements

Magnetic flux lines

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

COMPUTER PROGRAMS for MAGNET DESIGN

3d : OPERA-3d (Pre-and Post-Processor, TOSCA, ELEKTRA,

SOPRANO, Geometric Modeller, SCALA,

CONCERTO, TEMPO)

COIL YOKE

POLESSHIMS

COIL Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

COMPUTER PROGRAMS for MAGNET DESIGN

3d : OPERA-3d (Pre-and Post-Processor, TOSCA, ELEKTRA,

SOPRANO, Geometric Modeller, SCALA,

CONCERTO, TEMPO)

Magnetic flux in the iron

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

DESIGNING A BENDING MAGNET

SOURCE

TARGET

Assignment: Design a 90-degree bending magnet for beam analysis with the duoplasmatronion source and injection into an accelerator.

The magnet must adhere to the following requirements: Bending angle = 90 degrees, Radius of curvature = 220 mm

Pole gap = 70 mm, Beam width in pole gap 40 mm

Maximum energy of protons injected into the accelerator = 20 keV

Maximum current by power supply is 6 A

Therefore : Calculate the main parameters

of the magnet that will transfer the beam from the source to the target. rigidity and magnetic flux density maximum B field pole width (homogenity of the field) thickness of iron yoke the mmf the number of coil turns voltage and power at a max. 6 A Then: Measure and calculate the excitation curve, effective length and field homogenity Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy

MAGNET DESIGN : POLE WIDTH

0.01x pole beam

0.001x

Pole width, w = x + ?

Pole gap, g ??

And for a variation of less than 0.1% it becomes

If the horizontal beam diameter is about 40 mm

then the minimum pole gap width can be computed within 0.1% variation in the magnetic flux density region across the beam width, using the above relation, is And for a maximum variation of 1% the pole width is

0.0012 2 70 40 180w g x mm mm mm 0.0170 40 110w g x mm mm mm

For a magnet with a pole width wand gapg the width Ʃx0.01over which the field varies less than 1%, is more of less given by:

οݔ଴Ǥ଴ଵൌݓെ݃ οݔ଴Ǥ଴ଵൌݓെ-݃ Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy 26

Shims for dipole magnet to improve the

uniformity of magnetic field

Shim Area؆

Shim area = s x d

With 0.2൑ݏȀ݃൑-Ǥ͸

݃ൌpole gap

w= width of pole s = width of shim d = height of shim MAGNET DESIGN : MAGNETIC RIGIDITY, FLUX DENSITY, YOKE THICKNESS

Foraparticlewithchargeq,massmandspeedvmovingina

uniform,time-independentmagneticfield,B,onacircularorbitwith radiusofcurvature,,atarightangletotheuniformmagneticfield, theLorentzforceequaltothecentrifugalforce:

2mvqvB mv

qB Themomentum,mv,can,foragivenchargeq,beexpressedbythe productB.TheproductBiscalledthemagneticrigidityofthe particleandisadirectmeasureofthemomentum.The expressionrelatingthetotalenergyEandthemomentumpofa particleis:

2 2 2 2 2E p c m c

Using the energy relations

0kE E E2E mc

and with c= speed of light,

E0= the rest energy of the particle

Ek= the kinetic energy of the particle

2

02kkE E EBQc

and with an absolute charge state

Qand energy in eV, it becomes

2

02kkE E EmvBq qc

The rigidity (in SI-units)

The magnetic rigidity of a 20 keVproton (maximum injection energy), is

0.0204B Tm

Withtheradiusofthemagnetknown(theradiuswasfixedbythe doublefocusingdistance)themaximumfluxdensityforthemagnet is:

0.02040.09270.22

TmBTm If we assume thatsaturation will only be reached when the magnetic flux density in the iron is about 1.2 T, and that the flux that passes through the iron is the same as that which passes through the pole gap, the following calculation can be used to determine the minimum thickness of the iron yokepieces. Magnetic flux through air (pole gap) = Magnetic flux through iron g g i iA B y A B where,

Ag=crosssectionalareaofthepolegap,

Ai=crosssectionalareaoftheironyoke,

Bg=magneticfluxdensityinthepolegap,

Bi=magneticfluxdensityintheironyoke,

y=numberofyokepiecesforclosingofthemagneticfluxloop, whichisdeterminedbythemagnetshape(i.e.y=1foraC-magnet andy=2foranH-magnet) Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy MAGNET DESIGN : YOKE THICKNESS, MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE

Thepath-length,L,ofa900circularbendisgivenby:

2 2 22034644

mmL mm DUu | Assuming a H-shape magnet, the minimum thickness of the yoke pieces can thus be calculated as follows: 2 gg i ii

ABThicknessB length

uu

346 110 0.0927

346 2 1.2

mm mm T mm T uu4.3mm

The yoke thickness was chosen, a practical 20 mm.

Tocreatethemagneticfieldinthemagnetacertainmagneto- motiveforce(mmf)percentimeterlength(orfieldstrength) thatwillgivethemaximumfluxdensitythroughthemagnet hastobeapplied.Therequiredmmfisgeneratedbythecoil windingsinthemagnetthroughwhichacurrentissent.

Followinglaw(theintegralofthemagneticfield

alongaclosedpathequalstheenclosedtotalcurrent):

H d l NI

where,

H=magneticintensityorthefieldstrengthinA/m,

N=numberofturnsinthewindings,

I=currentinAthroughthewindings.

2g g i i iiA B y A B length thickness B a b c d e g w It is assumed that the magnetic flux density in the iron is constant and the flux density between the poles is constant and that the direction of the field is parallel to the arrows of path a-b-c-d-e-g (as shown in the figure). The mmfis where, Hg= magnetic intensity in the air between the poles,

Hi= magnetic intensity in the iron,

l= a+ b + c+d+e, g= pole-gap. The relationship between the magnetic flux density Band magnetic intensity His glH g H l NI 0rBH glg H nH NI

Wherer=relativepermeabilityofthematerial,

And 0= permeability of free space.

With the path l= n xgit becomes

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop 21 29 October 2019 Trieste Italy MAGNET DESIGN : MAGNETO-MOTIVE FORCE, MAXIMUM CURRENT, NUMBER OF COIL TURNS, CURRENT DENSITY, LENGTH OF COIL, COIL RESISTANCE, VOLTAGE, POWER CONSUMPTION

Themmfnowbecomes:

00 gi air iron

BnBg NI


Politique de confidentialité -Privacy policy