10 mars 2015 Fiumara Alessandro and Senter
31 janv. 2019 hydrodynamics and unsteady aerodynamics to study. Floating Wind Turbines. Leroy Vincent Jean-Christophe Gilloteaux
Aerodynamics is the study of the dynamics of gases or the interaction between moving object and atmosphere causing an airflow around a body.
21 mai 2021 Experimental study of the aerodynamic noise produced by flow-body ... airfoil is studied in an anechoic wind tunnel especially the.
14 mai 2018 Experimental study on flat plate in high-amplitude pitch ramp motion ... In both studies a better mastering of the unsteady aerodynamics in ...
9 mars 2020 Acoustic signal of speech sounds is underlain by aerodynamic principles. ... in which the study of aerodynamic constraints on speech was an ...
14 sept. 2017 among which the study of the "Lombard speech" - louder voice and tendency ... Studies directly relating to the aerodynamic aspects of vocal ...
4 mars 2009 insect hovering on flapping-wing aerodynamics is of interest to both the ... Studies on unsteady aerodynamics of a single flapping-.
12 juin 2020 Automotive aerodynamics comprises of the study of aerodynamics of road vehicles. Its main goals are reducing drag.
A STUDY OF THE MOTION AND AERODYNAMIC. HEATING OF BALLISTIC MISSILES ENTERING THE. EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE AT HIGH SUPERSONIC. SPEEDS1.
![Development of a simulation tool coupling hydrodynamics and Development of a simulation tool coupling hydrodynamics and](https://pdfprof.com/EN_PDFV2/Docs/PDF_3/700_3document.jpg)
700_3document >G A/, ?H@yR83d3e3 ?iiTb,ff?HXb+B2M+2f?H@yR83d3e3 am#KBii2/ QM R9 a2T kyRd >GBb KmHiB@/Bb+BTHBM`v QT2M ++2bb `+?Bp2 7Q` i?2 /2TQbBi M/ /Bbb2KBMiBQM Q7 b+B@
2MiB}+ `2b2`+? /Q+mK2Mib- r?2i?2` i?2v `2 Tm#@
HBb?2/ Q` MQiX h?2 /Q+mK2Mib Kv +QK2 7`QK
i2+?BM; M/ `2b2`+? BMbiBimiBQMb BM 6`M+2 Q` #`Q/- Q` 7`QK Tm#HB+ Q` T`Bpi2 `2b2`+? +2Mi2`bX
Gö`+?Bp2 Qmp2`i2 THm`B/Bb+BTHBMB`2>G- 2bi
/2biBMû2 m /ûT¬i 2i ¨ H /BzmbBQM /2 /Q+mK2Mib b+B2MiB}[m2b /2 MBp2m `2+?2`+?2- Tm#HBûb Qm MQM- ûKMMi /2b ûi#HBbb2K2Mib /ö2Mb2B;M2K2Mi 2i /2 `2+?2`+?2 7`MÏBb Qm ûi`M;2`b- /2b H#Q`iQB`2b
Tm#HB+b Qm T`BpûbX
1biBKiBM; oQ+H 1zQ`i 7`QK i?2 2`Q/vMKB+b Q7
G#BH 6`B+iBp2b, 62bB#BHBiv aim/v
hQ +Bi2 i?Bb p2`bBQM, uQ?MM J2vM/B2`- MBi 1H >DD- JB+?2H SBi2`KMM- h?B2``v G2;Qm- MiQBM2 :BQpMMBX 1biBKiBM; oQ+H 1zQ`i 7`QK i?2 2`Q/vMKB+b Q7 G#BH 6`B+iBp2b, 62bB#BHBiv aim/vX CQm`MH Q7 oQB+2- kyR3- jk UeV- TTXddRX2R8@ddRX2k9X RyXRyRefDXDpQB+2XkyRdXy3XyRyX ?H@yR83d3e3 ESTIMATING VOCAL EFFORT FROM THE AERODYNAMICS OF LABIAL FRICATIVES: Yohann Meynadier1, Anita El Hajj1, Michel Pitermann1, 1, Antoine Giovanni12
1Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix
2 airflow resistance;
Study D
Results and Conclusion:
1
INTRODUCTION
Vocal fol
2 of -The The parameter indicative of the effective force necessary to produce ; close to 0 for vowels 3 normal subject, , 4 R
OBJECTIVE
The goal of
this 5 fricative
MATERIALS AND METHOD
This feasibility study was
accuracy 3/s), 6 T D -z $z/ 7 3/s) 3/s (RStudio Inc.; Boston, . The
EXPERIMENT 1
The efficiency of an indirect measurement of Rglo via Rlab of fricatives
Results
Table 1
8 decreases when
Discussion
The
9 even more significant than for /f/. or Frazer 10 constriction is long enough. Nevertheless,
EXPERIMENT 2
Experiment 2
11
Results
Airflow
The results on airflow v
3/s3/s
Air p
As represented in
- 12 22.
Airway resistances
Means and statistical differences
3/s 3/s
3/s) 3/s)
3/s in Threshold
3/s) 3/s). For
3/s)3/s
13
Figure 4 represents the linear regression
2
Discussion
The objective of thi
14
Fl
15 features
CONCLUSION
The general hypothesis of our work was that when a 16 inexperienced subjects producing [1]
J Speech 2004; 551.
J Voice. 2012; 26(5): 665.e9
J Voice.
Ann
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;
J Voice. 2015; 29(5): 530
Speech Production and Speech Modelling.
Les Cahiers d'Oto
.1990;
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016; 140(1): 45.
J . 2016; 140(1): 369. 17 [12]
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016; 21: 1
J Phon. 1973; 1(1):
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97(5 Pt
J Acoust Soc Am.
Logop Phoniatr
J200 (5): J.
J Acoust Soc Am.
1992;
Folia Phoniatr Logo. 1996;
J Voice. 2001; Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;
L'aérodynamique de la voix
J Speech
. 18 [25]
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(6): 3438
J Acoust Soc Am. 635.
J Acoust Soc Am.
J Speech Hear.
J Phon.
J Acoust Soc Am.
J Speech Hear Disord.
J Voice; 1995; 9(2): 149155.
Eur J Disord
. 1995; 30(4): 435449. J
J Voice. 1992; 6(3): 235245.
Proc . Marseille, France;
Logop Phoniatr Voco.
19 [38] Proceedings of Larynx 97. Marseille, France; 1997: 6972. are involved. Biometrika. 1947; 34(135. Proc.
J Speech Lang Hear
J Speech Lang
208.
Approximating Subglottal Pressure from Oral Pressure: A Methodological Study. ccessed April 2017.
Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Phonetica. 210.
J . 1979; 7: 357373.
J Acoust
801.
Nord J Ling.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1623.
Logoped Phoniatr. 1982; 16:
Laryngeal function in phonation and respiration. Boston, USA: College 20 [52]
Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes,
. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia: Psychology
J Voice. 1996; 10(3): 236
Table 1: Difference between Ps and Po in hPa (ǻ ǻ
0.64 0.83
slope t(34)=4.98 p = 1.81e-5 t(33)=7.79 p = 5.64e-9 t(34)=10.50 p = 3.31e-12 t(28)=11.84 p = 2.06e-12 t(135)=72.37 p < 2.2e-16 t(21)=35.60 p < 2e-16
0.32 0.20
slope p t(33)=3.27 p = 2.5e-3 t(33)=4.11 p = 2.5e-4 t(34)=5.33 p = 6.37e-6 t(28)=2.68 p = 1.2e-2 t(135)=36.29 p < 2e-16 t(21)=23.24 p < 2e-16 (in 3/s) p p p (0.07)ns (0.05)ns (0.05)< 0.01 (0.04) (0.07)ns (0.07)ns (0.08)< 0.01 (0.10) (0.13)ns (0.55)ns (0.19)< 0.01 (0.28) 21
Table 4 (in hPa)
p p p (0.38)< 0.01 (0.69)< 0.01 (2.13)< 0.01 (3.89) (0.46)< 0.01 (0.88)< 0.01 (2.44)< 0.01 (3.71) (0.61)0.015 (0.58)< 0.01 (1.50)< 0.01 (1.98) (0.41)< 0.01 (0.78)< 0.01 (2.45)< 0.01 (2.66) (0.43)< 0.01 (0.78)< 0.01 (2.66)< 0.01 (1.72) 3/s) p p p (3.48)< 0.01 (3.85)< 0.01 (9.17)< 0.01 (9.81) (4.20)< 0.01 (9.02)< 0.01 (12.90)ns (9.31) (2.95)0.017 (5.06)< 0.01 (8.32)< 0.01 (7.34) (1.70)ns (1.64)< 0.01 (4.89)ns (6.39) (1.71)< 0.01 (2.85)< 0.01 (9.20)< 0.01 (15.01)
Figure
22
3/s 23
Figure 4