Quels sont les répertoires de laction politique aujourdhui ?
Le répertoire de l'action politique se limite-t-il au vote ? Montrez que la participation politique repose sur des répertoires d'action politique variés.
Chapitre 5 – Quels sont les répertoires de laction politique aujourd
?3- Qu'est-ce qui dans le récit de Tocqueville
Stage SSP - Répertoires daction politique (BH)
II. AU-DELA DU VOTE QUELS SONT LES REPERTOIRES DE L'ACTION POLITIQUE AUJOURD'HUI ? La participation politique ne se limite pas à la
Manuel du Conseil de sécurité de lONU
Sep 11 2022 Quel est l'ordre de vote sur les amendements ? Que se passe-t-il si un projet de résolution est appuyé ? 2.2 Ordre du jour du Conseil de ...
The Carter Center International Election Observation Mission to
The Congo has tremendous natural resources but they have not been managed to the benefit of the population. The presidential and legislative elections held on
Chapitre 5 – Quels sont les répertoires de laction politique aujourd
?3- Qu'est-ce qui dans le récit de Tocqueville
Stage de science politique : La participation politique
Jan 15 2016 14- Le répertoire de l'action politique se limite-t-il au vote ? France métropole
Chapitre 2. Quels sont les répertoires de laction politique aujourd
A. Les répertoires d'action collective selon Charles Tilly. B. Vers de nouveaux La participation politique se limite-t-elle au fait de voter ?
LYCEE PARC IMPERIAL – COMMENT EXPLIQUER L
Problématique : la vie démocratique se limite-t-elle au vote ? Il s'agit de montrer que l'engagement politique peut prendre des formes variées.
Marchandisation du vote citoyenneté et consolidation démocratique
Enfin il faudra garder à l'esprit que l'évolution des imaginaires politiques est indissociable de leur rapport à la matérialité (5) : dès lors
Les répertoires de l'action politique - Maxicours
on proposera une conception ouverte de la notion de répertoire d’action politique ne se résumant pas à la pratique régulière du vote On présentera notamment les dimensions individuelles comme collectives de l’action de protestation politique L’évolution des répertoir es d’action politique sera
Quels sont les répertoires de l’action politique?
Les répertoires de l’action politique sont à la fois conventionnels (vote, participation à la vie publique sous forme d’associations) et non conventionnels (contestation, actions illégales…). Ces formes d’action sont aujourd’hui influencées par la médiatisation et les nouveaux moyens de communication grâce à internet.
Quels sont les principes de la politique de vote ?
Les principes énoncés dans le document sur la « politique de vote » visent à définir le cadre dans lequel nous exerçons les droits de vote en connaissance de cause et dans l'intérêt exclusif des porteurs de parts.
Qu'est-ce que le répertoire d'action politique?
Charles Tilly, La France conteste, de 1600 à nos jours, Fayard, 1986. On retient la définition de répertoire d’action politique: » des moyens d’agir en commun sur la base d’intérêts partagés »
Quels sont les facteurs qui influencent le vote politique ?
Quels sont les facteurs qui influencent notre vote politique ? Notre système politique fonde une large partie de son fonctionnement sur la démocratie, de sorte que les représentants des chambres principales (congrès et sénat) sont indirectement élus par le vote des citoyens à travers les listes de candidats qui complètent les listes des partis.
The Carter Center
International Election Observation Mission to
Democratic Republic of Congo 2006
Presidential and Legislative Elections
Final Report
One Copenhill
453 Freedom Parkway
Atlanta, GA 30307
(404) 420-5188Fax (404) 420-5196
www.cartercenter.org 2CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................5
POLITICAL BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................15
CONFLICT IN THE DRC ................................................................................................ 15
INTERNATIONAL ACTORS ............................................................................................. 18
SELECT INTERNATIONAL NONGOVERNMENTAL ACTORS ............................................. 20ELECTION SECURITY .................................................................................................... 21
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ELECTIONS ................................................................................ 24
CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM .................................................................................. 24
GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS ....................................................................................... 25
ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................................ 26
ELECTORAL SYSTEM .................................................................................................... 26
POLITICAL PARTIES ...................................................................................................... 29
POLITICAL FINANCE ..................................................................................................... 30
ELECTORAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION .............................................................................. 30
HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS .................................................................................... 32
PRE-ELECTION OBSERVATION .............................................................................................33
ELECTION PREPARATIONS ............................................................................................ 33
POLITICAL PARTIES ...................................................................................................... 42
SELECTED PARTY PROFILES ......................................................................................... 42
PRE-CAMPAIGN POLITICAL TENSIONS .......................................................................... 44
POLITICAL COALITIONS ............................................................................................... 46
ELECTION CAMPAIGN .................................................................................................. 47
CHALLENGES TO THE CREDIBILITY OF THE ELECTORAL PROCESS ............................... 49CAMPAIGN FINANCE .................................................................................................... 50
MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 51
DOMESTIC OBSERVERS ................................................................................................ 52
POLLING OBSERVATION: JULY 20 PRESIDENTIAL AND LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS ................54FIRST-ROUND TABULATION ......................................................................................... 54
FIRST-ROUND ELECTION RESULTS ............................................................................... 58
VIOLENCE FOLLOWS ANNOUNCEMENT OF RESULTS .................................................... 59PRE-ELECTION OBSERVATION, SECOND ROUND .................................................................61
POLLING OBSERVATION: OCT. 29 PRESIDENTIAL RUNOFF AND PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS ...69SECOND-ROUND ELECTION RESULTS ........................................................................... 70
POSTELECTION VIOLENCE IN KINSHASA ...................................................................... 71
ELECTORAL DISPUTES ................................................................................................. 71
PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS .............................................................................................. 74
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................75
ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................................ 75
POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS ................................................................................................ 76
POLITICAL PARTY FINANCE ......................................................................................... 77
VOTING ........................................................................................................................ 77
3COUNTING ................................................................................................................... 79
TABULATION ................................................................................................................ 80
ELECTION-DAY SECURITY ............................................................................................ 80
ANNOUNCEMENT OF RESULTS ..................................................................................... 80
MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 81
CIVIC EDUCATION ........................................................................................................ 81
CONFIDENCE AND SECURITY ....................................................................................... 82
ELECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION ................................................................................. 83
DOMESTIC OBSERVATION ............................................................................................ 83
APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................85
APPENDIX A ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
APPENDIX B DELEGATION MEMBERS, FIRST ROUND²JULY 30, 2006 APPENDIX C DELEGATION MEMBERS, SECOND ROUND²OCT. 29, 2006APPENDIX D TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
APPENDIX E LETTER OF INVITATION²ENGLISH
APPENDIX F LETTER OF INVITATION²FRENCH
APPENDIX G COMPOSITION OF TRANSITIONAL GOVERNMENT
APPENDIX H CARTER CENTER OBSERVER DEPLOYMENT, FIRST ROUND APPENDIX I CARTER CENTER OBSERVER DEPLOYMENT, SECOND ROUNDAPPENDIX J DRC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 2006
APPENDIX K PRESIDENTIAL AND LEGISLATIVE ELECTION RESULTS,FIRST AND SECOND ROUNDS
APPENDIX L CARTER CENTER STATEMENTS
APPENDIX M OBSERVATION FORMS
APPENDIX N LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT OBSERVED THE ELECTIONS 4 5EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 2006 presidential and legislative
elections in the Democratic Republic ofCongo (DRC) represent a milestone in
both Congolese and African history. The area and fourth largest in population, emerged in the late 1990s from 30 years of brutal dictatorship only to fall into what the United Nations referred to as crisis.´ A civil war, involving a half- dozen armies from neighboring countries, left millions dead in the last decade. The 2006 elections marked the formal culmination of a transitional peace process underway since 2003 and real chance for peace and democracy since independence in 1960.These elections were the last and best
hope for maintaining the current tentative peace in the DRC, the consequences of which reach beyond its borders to the subregion and even impact the continent as a whole. The consequences are also economic. A successful electoral process is a necessary step in the long road of building a stable and prosperous economy in Central Africa. The Congo has tremendous natural resources but they have not been managed to the benefit of the population. The presidential and legislative elections held on July 20 and Oct. 29, 2006, produced leaders in 40 years. Incumbent PresidentJoseph Kabila was elected following a
runoff election against Jean-PierreBemba.
If well governed and successful at
bringing about peace in its eastern regions, the DRC has the potential to become an economic powerhouse and serve as a catalyst for the development of Central Africa and the entire continent.FRAGILE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS
Despite remaining pockets of armed
conflict in the eastern part of the country, the Congolese peace process made dramatic strides as citizens prepared for their first multiparty democratic elections in 2006. Many ex- combatants demobilized and concrete, though insufficient, advances were made toward establishing an integrated national army. Monetary stability returned as well and inflation, which stood at 630 percent in 1998, was down to less than three percent by early 2004.Although the Sun City Peace Accord
called for elections by June 2005, a provision enabled up to two delays of six months each. In a swirl of uncertainty and political suspicion, the government invoked these delays, citing the postponed adoption of the electoral law by the National Assembly and the challenges of establishing an election commission capable of conducting an election in the conditions of the DRC.Once the legislative framework was
adopted, election authorities registered more than 25 million voters betweenJune and December 2005 and held a
constitutional referendum Dec. 18±19,2005, which resulted in a new
6 constitution approved by 83 percent of voters. The registration of presidential and legislative candidates was successfully completed in early 2006, followed by the recruitment and training of poll workers and a major logistical exercise to equip approximately 50,000 polling stations across the country.Ballot papers were printed in South
Africa and airlifted by the South
Africans to multiple drop-off points in
the DRC.This report illustrates only some of the
challenges of running elections in a country the size of Western Europe with little to no national infrastructure or experience conducting democratic elections, continued violence, large numbers of displaced people, and rampant corruption. The international community mobilized its largest-ever electoral support effort in which theUnited Nations provided significant
technical assistance and massive logistical resources to help with the deployment of electoral material and the collection of results. The United NationsMission in Congo (MONUC) was the
nearly 20,000 combined uniformed and civilian personnel. The IndependentElectoral Commission (CEI, or
Électorale Nationale
Indépendante) strengthened its
institutional capacity after the voter registration process and constitutional referendum revealed serious shortages in the quality and quantity of resources dedicated to training polling staff and providing civic and voter education.However, features of the electoral
system (open-list proportional representation) posed their own challenges, such as a complex and, in some cases, multipage ballots in large urban areas such as Kinshasa where some 10 percent of the simple yes/no ballots from the constitutional referendum were spoiled due to incorrect marking by voters.To compound the already tremendous
technical challenges of these elections, an extremely volatile political environment threatened to drag the democratic process once more into violence. The transitional government established by the Sun City Accord was an uneasy power-sharing arrangement between former belligerent parties, some of which were accused of war crimes.Several of these same parties, whose
strength was military and who lacked popular support at a national level, faced a likely loss of much of their power as a result of these elections. Other political leaders called the election preparations seriously flawed and threatened to undermine the process unless they received negotiated assurances about the transparency of the process and a commitment that the elected representatives would be able to form a new government.The Carter Center launched its
international election observation mission in full recognition of the fact that even without premeditation bitter and possibly violent disputes over the results were likely as well as vehement accusations of fraud by the losers. The destructive forces of xenophobia and nationalism were among the dangerous cards that some political actors played, capitalizing on the (well-deserved) distrust of the international community, 7 more recent interference in neighboring countries.Carter Center observers witnessed
constant reminders of the violence throughout the country, and theCongolese people knew that the
integration of former combatants into the national armed forces was far from irreversible. The Center received many reports of human rights abuses committed by various military subgroups, and there were frequent outbreaks of fighting between military groups along the lines of their original loyalties, some involving Joseph private security of Jean-Pierre Bemba.CARTER CENTER OBSERVATION
METHODOLOGY
Following invitations from President
Joseph Kabila and the president of the
electoral commission, Abbé ApollinaireMalumalu, The Carter Center conducted
two assessment visits in 2005. In April2006, the Center established a field
office in Kinshasa to coordinate election observation activities. Through a combination of long- and short-term election monitoring, the Center monitored election preparations and political developments and was able to provide feedback to election authorities, political parties, and domestic observers throughout the mission. The Center issued multiple public reports and conducted many private meetings to share its findings. international election observation mission to the DRC was to contribute to a credible electoral process that met international standards and facilitated a democratic and peaceful political transition in the DRC through the following activities:Conduct an impartial assessment of
the transitional election processes and, where relevant, make recommendations for improvementCollaborate with local Congolese
play a constructive role in the electoral process, including strengthening their capacity to mount credible observation efforts observation activities with the government of the DRC, electoral authorities, political parties, and civil society actors in order to contribute to improved electoral processesProvide tools for Congolese parties
to resolve peacefully election disputes and discourage violence related to the electoral process, possibly through the establishment of effective monitoring by Congolese civil society organizations, civic dialogue, and liaison structures where the electoral authority, political parties, and civil society organizations could discuss issues of mutual interestDemonstrate international support
for the Congolese transition and, if necessary, facilitate mediation of electoral and other disputes amongCongolese leaders
The Center provided an impartial and
independent assessment of the 2006 electoral process through the deployment of long-term observers (LTOs) fromApril to September and organized a 60-
8 person international delegation for theJuly 30 elections. As a result of logistical
and transport challenges in the DRC, theCenter deployed most of the delegation
for approximately one month rather than the 10-day deployment associated with typical observation delegations. A limited number of short-term observers arrived several days before the election for deployment in the Kinshasa area.The delegation included political
leaders, electoral and country specialists, representatives from civil society groups, election authorities, and others.Building on the pre-election efforts of
the LTOs the observer delegation achieved good geographic coverage across the country and coordinated its deployment with other international and domestic observer groups.The Center maintained a postelection
presence to observe vote counting, tabulation, the announcement of results, and the processing of electoral complaints. The Center organized a second 60-person international delegation for the presidential runoff election on Oct. 29, 2006. Upon arrival in Kinshasa, all Carter Center observers were briefed on the political situation in the DRC and received orientation on specific aspects of election observation, including the use of checklists, deployment logistics, reporting requirements, and security guidelines.Based on established methodology, the
Center deployed observers in teams of
two. Owing to the logistical challenges infrastructure, air and ground transport was often unreliable, expensive, and subject to frequent delays or breakdowns. The demanding conditions of multiple deployments by each LTO team to different areas of the country proved challenging. LTOs visited most parts of the country, including Kikwit inBandundu province, Mbandaka in
Equateur province, and Lubumbashi in
Katanga province. Subsequent
deployments covered Bukavu,Kisangani, Gemena, Uvira, Mbuji Mayi,
quotesdbs_dbs35.pdfusesText_40[PDF] montrez que les répertoires de l'action politique sont variés.
[PDF] définition de l'éducation pdf
[PDF] connectés pour apprendre les élèves et les nouvelles technologies
[PDF] education english pdf
[PDF] metier du bois liste
[PDF] métiers de la forêt
[PDF] formation adulte metier du bois
[PDF] metier dans le bois
[PDF] psychologie et éducation pdf
[PDF] entreprise les métiers du bois
[PDF] impact du numérique sur l'apprentissage
[PDF] les métiers du bois qui recrutent
[PDF] offre d'emploi filière forêt bois
[PDF] rapport onusida 2014 pdf