LES PILIERS ATTALIDES ET LA TERRASSE PERGAMÉNIENNE A
196. Sur les offrandes royales liées à ces combats voir la synthèse de H. J. Schalles
Rousseau and Spinoza: Their Political Theories and Their
35 Thus M. Liepmann op. cit.
Telephones in public health policy processes in sub-Saharan Africa
documents were finally included in the final synthesis after a review of the abstract and courage citizens' empowerment on health questions by de-.
Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Mr. Olivier De Clercq DG Environment
BILAN DACTIVITÉ INTERMÉDIAIRE DES SOCIÉTÉS AGRÉÉES
02-Nov-2015 Eco-Emballages et Adelphe ont chacun un agrément de l'Etat d'une durée de 6 ... l'environnement et de l'ADEME les éléments d'actualisation ...
cnrs
15-Feb-2000 En décembre 2001 à l'issue de 20 mois de travail
Le commerce de la Viande déléphant en Afrique Centrale - Rapport
20-Jul-1995 sur les questions controversées relatives à l'éléphant. ... Le commerce de la viande d'éléphant en Afrique Centrale - Rapport de synthèse.
Determinants of market uptake of innovation in a situation of
04-Sept-2018 ajoutées de réflexion les questions et commentaires reçus qui ont ... states that the evidence of the synthesis of a citratestabilized ...
Consulter la Stratégie 3R pour les emballages en plastique à usage
01-Apr-2022 question de nos modes de vie de consommation
Understanding the experiences of schooling of visually impaired
08-Jul-2019 qu'allégé les doutes inhérents au processus de recherche et pour le ... Jacques Wahart
Development of Guidance on Extended
Producer Responsibility (EPR)
FINAL REPORT
European Commission Ȃ DG Environment
2014In collaboration with:
2 | Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Document information
CLIENT European Commission Ȃ DG Environment
CONTRACT NUMBER No 07.0307/2012/63260/ETU/C2
REPORT TITLE Final Report
PROJECT NAME Development of Guidance on Extended ProducerResponsibility (EPR)
PROJECT TEAM BIO by Deloitte; in collaboration with Arcadis, Ecologic, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP),Umweltbundesamt (UBA)
PROJECT OFFICER Mr. Michel Sponar, DG Environment, Directorate A,Unit A2
Mr. Olivier De Clercq, DG Environment, Directorate A,Unit A2
DATE 2014
AUTHORS Mrs. Véronique Monier, BIO by Deloitte
Mr. Shailendra Mudgal, BIO by Deloitte
Mr. Mathieu Hestin, BIO by Deloitte
Mr. Jérémie Cavé, BIO by Deloitte
Mrs. Manuela Gheoldus, BIO by Deloitte
Mr Mike Van Acoleyen, Arcadis
Mrs. Ilse Laureysens, Arcadis
Mrs. Emma Watkins, IEEP
Mrs. Doreen Fedrigo-Fazio, IEEP
Mr. Hubert Reisinger, UBA
Mr. Thomas Weissenbach, UBA
Mrs. Judith Oliva, UBA
Mr. Lucas Porsch, Ecologic
KEY CONTACTS Véronique Monier
vmonier@bio.deloitte.fr OrMathieu Hestin
mhestin@bio.deloitte.fr DISCLAIMER The project team does not accept any liability for any direct or indirect damage resulting from the use of this report or its content. This report contains the results of research by the authors and is not to be perceived as the opinion of the European Commission.Photo credit: cover @ Per Ola Wiberg
Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) | 3Table of contents
4 | Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Table of Contents
DOCUMENT INFORMATION 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
GLOSSARY 7
SYMBOLS 10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
CHAPTER 1. CONTEXT, OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH 29
1.1 Context and objectives 29
1.2 Methodological approach 32
1.2.1 Panorama of EPR schemes in EU-28 33
1.2.2 Selection of waste streams and case studies 34
1.2.3 In-depth analysis of 36 case studies 36
1.2.4 Exploration of four main issues related to EPR design and implementation 38
1.2.5 Guiding principles 39
1.2.6 Stakeholder consultation 39
CHAPTER 2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF EPR SCHEMES IN THE EU 412.1 Existing EPR schemes in EU-28 41
2.2 Performance of EPR schemes in the EU 46
2.2.1 Batteries 48
2.2.2 ELVs 49
2.2.3 Oils 50
2.2.4 Packaging 51
2.2.5 WEEE 54
2.3 Focus on 36 case studies 56
2.3.1 EPR systems functioning 56
2.3.2 Systems performance 64
CHAPTER 3. MAIN TOPICS CONSIDERED FOR GUIDANCE 79
3.1 Share of responsibilities and dialogue between stakeholders 80
3.1.1 Issues under consideration 80
3.1.2 Findings from the case studies 82
3.1.3 Taking stakeholders' expertise into account 88
Table of contents
Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) | 53.1.4 Towards guiding principles 90
3.2 Cost coverage and true cost principle 91
3.2.1 Issues under consideration 91
3.2.2 Findings from the case studies 92
3.2.3 7MNLQJ VPMNHOROGHUV· H[SHUPLVH LQPR MŃŃRXQP 96
3.2.4 Towards possible guiding principles 99
3.3 Fair competition 100
3.3.1 Issues under consideration 100
3.3.2 Findings from the case studies 101
3.3.3 7MNLQJ VPMNHOROGHUV· H[SHUPLVH LQPR MŃŃRXQP 107
3.3.4 Towards possible guiding principles 108
3.4 Transparency and surveillance 109
3.4.1 Issues under consideration for transparency 109
3.4.2 Issues under consideration for surveillance 109
3.4.3 Findings from the case studies 110
3.4.4 7MNLQJ VPMNHOROGHUV· H[SHUPLVH LQPR MŃŃRunt 117
3.4.5 Concluding remarks 118
3.4.6 Towards possible guiding principles 121
CHAPTER 4. GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1224.1 Statement n°1: Clarification of the definition and objectives of EPR 122
4.1.1 Guiding principle 122
4.1.2 Policy options 124
4.2 Statement n°2: The shared responsibilities principle 124
4.2.1 Guiding principle 124
4.2.2 Policy options 125
4.3 Statement n°3: The full net cost coverage principle 126
4.3.1 Guiding principle 126
4.3.2 Policy options 126
4.4 Statement n°4: The true end-of-life costs principle 127
4.4.1 Guiding principle 127
4.4.2 Policy options 128
4.5 Statement n°5: The fair competition principle 129
4.5.1 Guiding principle 129
4.5.2 Policy options 130
4.6 Statement n°6: The transparency principle 131
4.6.1 Guiding principle 131
Table of contents
6 | Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
4.6.2 Policy options 132
4.7 Statement n°7: The reporting harmonisation principle 132
4.7.1 Guiding principle 132
4.7.2 Policy options 132
4.8 Statement n°8: The monitoring and surveillance principle 133
4.8.1 Guiding principle 133
4.8.2 Policy options 134
CHAPTER 5. ANNEX 135
5.1 Preliminary analysis of EPR in the EU 135
5.2 Organisational aspects and share of responsibilities between actors 154
5.2.1 Type of PRO responsibility 154
5.2.2 What exactly does the PRO do? 158
5.2.3 Role of Local Authorities 160
5.3 True cost principle and cost coverage 161
5.3.1 Organisational costs coverage 161
5.3.2 Which kind of costs are taken into account? 164
5.3.3 Is there a minimal level of service and/or geographical coverage defined by legislation? 167
5.3.5 Comparing technical performances 171
5.3.6 Comparing cost-effectiveness 175
5.4 Fair competition 178
5.4.1 Is there competition among PROs? 178
5.4.2 Is there competition among WM operators? 181
5.5 Transparency and surveillance 184
5.5.1 Transparency 184
5.5.2 Monitoring of free riding 188
5.5.3 Surveillance of collection and treatment operations 194
5.5.4 Surveillance of PROs 196
5.6 Recommendations 205
Glossary
Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) | 7GLOSSARY
Term Definition
Civic amenity site A civic amenity site (or household waste recycling centre) is a facility where the public can dispose of sorted household waste. Civic amenity sites are generally run by the local authorities in a given municipality. Clearinghouse Third-party central agency or corporation acting as a regulator for a competitive marketC&I Commercial and Industrial (waste)
Deposit-refund scheme Recovery system that requires the collection of a monetary the point of sale. The deposit is refunded to the purchaser when they return the container to an authorised redemption centre. Non-recovered deposits may be used to finance waste collection and disposal facilities.EC European Commission
Eco-design Any production process that takes into account environmental considerations (e.g. raw material use, recyclability, end-of-life waste management requirements) at the product design stageEEE Electrical and Electronic Equipment
ELV End-of-Life Vehicle(s)
EPR Extended producer responsibility, i.e. an environmental policy EPR scheme Any system or scheme set up by one or several producers to implement the EPR principle.Synonyms: compliance scheme
Fee Price paid by a producer to have its products dealt with through a PRO Free riders Producers who do not contribute financially to any compliance scheme, but still benefit from their existence and action Guiding Principle General rule to be followed in order to move towards more efficient, accountable and harmonised practices for EPR schemesHH Household (waste)
Glossary
8 | Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Local authorities / Local public
authorities (LPAs) Elected and non-elected agents who manage a city or local community.Synonym: Municipalities
MS Member State(s)
MSW Municipal solid waste
Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) The polluter-pays principle is a guiding principle at European and international levels, which stipulates that the waste producer and the waste holder should bear the costs of waste management in a way that guarantees a high level of protection of the environment and human health. PRO Producer Responsibility Organisation, i.e. a collective entity set up by producers or through legislation, which becomes responsible for meeting the recovery and recycling obligations of the individual producers.quotesdbs_dbs46.pdfusesText_46[PDF] les adjectifs de couleur exercices corrigés pdf
[PDF] Les adjectifs de la 2ème classe
[PDF] les adjectifs démonstratifs exercices pdf
[PDF] les adjectifs démonstratifs pdf
[PDF] Les adjectifs possessifs
[PDF] les adjectifs possessifs et démonstratifs exercices
[PDF] Les adjectifs qualificatifs
[PDF] les adjectifs qualificatifs exercices pdf
[PDF] les adolescents et les parents
[PDF] Les ados
[PDF] les adverbes exercices pdf
[PDF] Les affaires de Jacques coeur
[PDF] les affaires publiques définition
[PDF] les affiches de la propagande durant la seconde guerre mondiale