[PDF] M Ed Research Proposal This study attempts to provide





Previous PDF Next PDF



M Ed Research Proposal

This study attempts to provide a picture of what is currently occurring in primary schools pertaining to the challenges that Foundation Phase teachers encounter 



Master of Education (M Ed) - (By Coursework and Research Report

submit a research proposal. However students with a background in postgraduate research in the. Humanities and Social Sciences may be exempted from attendance 



TNTEU - Submission of M.Ed. (Semester-I) Research Proposals for

I am by direction to inform you that the Colleges of Education affiliated to Tamil Nadu. Teachers Education University



Submission of M.Ed Research Proposals for (2018-2020) Batch

30 nov. 2018 The Principal's of Colleges of Education offering M.Ed. Programme. SirlMadam. Sub: TNTEU- Submission of M.Ed Research Proposals for ...



GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF A M.ED. THESIS

29 sept. 2010 the faculty of education office of Graduate programs and research ... Approval of M.Ed. Thesis Proposal - Form A located on the Forms ...



Searchable Listing of M.Ed. Thesis/Projects

Searchable Listing of M.Ed. Thesis/Projects. Number. Assigned Research. Project. 62. Jul-98 Hinkley Gina ... A Curriculum Proposal for Placing High-.



FACULTY OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

The TwoYear Master of Education (M.Ed.) is a professional programme Every candidate shall be required to submit a research proposal in the First.



Guidebook

Applying for an M.Ed. degree. 5. Admission Requirements. 5. How To Apply. 5-5. Mainly by research Programmes of Study. 7. Research Proposal.



Untitled

has accepted the Revised Syllabus of M.Ed. Two Years Degree Course Ist to (Preparation of research proposal and its presentation).



MEd (09250004)

All master's students must submit a dissertation or a mini-dissertation and must pass Research Proposal (NMQ. 800). For the MEd research degree programmes 

TEA

WHEN IMPLEMENTING THE CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENT

POLICY STATEMENT IN THE FOUNDATION PHASE

by

PEARL TABEA MOROLONG

Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree

MASTER OF EDUCATION

in the

Faculty of Humanities

at the

Central University of Technology, Free State

Supervisor: Dr AM RAMBUDA, PhD (Subject Didactics)

WELKOM

SEPTEMBER 2019

© Central University of Technology, Free State

i

DECLARATION WITH REGARD TO

INDEPENDENT WORK

I, Pearl Tabea Morolong, of student number , do hereby declare that this research project submitted to the Central University of Technology, Free State for the Degree: Master of Education, is my own independent work; and complies with the Code of Academic Integrity, as well as other relevant policies, procedures, rules and regulations of the Central University of Technology, Free State; and has not been submitted before to any institution by myself or any other person in fulfilment (or partial fulfilment) of the requirements for the attainment of any qualification. _______________________ _______________ SIGNATURE OF STUDENT DATE

© Central University of Technology, Free State

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank God Almighty for giving me the ability, courage and perservarance to undertake and complete this study. I would also like to acknowledge the following people for their contribution to this study: My supervisor; Dr. Awelani Rambuda for his professional guidance, academic knowledge, support and motivation throughout this research study. My beloved mother for her patience, prayers, unconditional love and support which has been the foundation of my endeavours. My husband; Gift Morolong for his unwavering love, support, understanding and encouragement during the periods when I needed it the most. My children; Keneilwe, Reabetswe and Kamohelo who sacrificed moments of quality family time during my pursuit of this project as well as my extended family for their kindness and support. All the teachers for their cooperation and valuable contribution and to the principals who allowed their schools to participate in the research study. Finally, I wish to acknowledge the financial contribution of Central University of Technology, Free State for ena bling the completion of this study. It is output.

© Central University of Technology, Free State

iii

DEDICATION

I dedicate this study to my beloved late father; MANDE DENNIS MATHIBE, who taught me the value of hard work and for inspiring me to pursue my goals in life and to my dear late sister; MASEGO MATHIBE for always believing in me and for her endless love. May their memories forever be a comfort and a blessing.

© Central University of Technology, Free State

iv

ABSTRACT

The South African education system has been evolving since the democratically elected government came into power in 1994. As a result, a number of curriculum reforms have been introduced within a short space of time. Curriculum change impacts on the work of the teachers who are at the forefront of curriculum innovation and implementation. This study attempts to provide a picture of what is currently occurring in primary schools pe rtaining to th e challenges th at Fou ndation Ph ase t eachers encounter when they implement Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) in the classroom. The understanding of the curriculum and how it impacts on their teaching practice. The literature review revealed that curriculum change is inevitable because in order to keep up with the needs of a constantly changing society, it also has to change. The question that captivated the researcher regarding curriculum change is how the teachers view th is chan ge and t heir experiences when im plementing t he new curriculum. The literat ure re viewed also revealed that, in any curr iculum cha nge, teachers as curriculum implementers should be involved in curriculum development processes and should undergo extensive training before the envisaged curriculum can be implemented. Furthermore, teachers should be exposed to continuous professional development so that they can be informe d on dev elopment s and i ncrease their knowledge and skills, which will result in quality teaching and learning. The stu dy employe d a sequential explanatory mixed method research design. This design afforded the research er an o pportunity to o btain in-depth knowledg e and understanding of the challenges Foundation Phase teachers experience when they implement CAPS. The findings of the study reveal that there is a statistically significant relationship between Foundation Phase CAPS. The results also reveal that the implementation of CAPS in the Foundation Phase is a burden; it is difficult and time consuming to implement CAPS in the Foundation

Phase; there is lack of the school management t

© Central University of Technology, Free State

v of CAPS; there is lack of in-service training; scastructure does not provide learners with a safe and healthy learning envir onment, there is minim al pa rental involvement at schools; there is lack of teaching and learning support material; there are overcrowded classrooms; progressed learners frustrate effective teaching and lastly, there is lack of teacher initiative. This research recommends that before a new curriculum is implemented, thorough research must be done along with an analysis to check the viability and implications of the curriculum in the South African context; assistant teachers should be introduced in the So uth African e ducation system to reduce the admin istration load of teach ers; teachers should receive training in the teaching of learners with learning barriers; there should be a re; there should be a provision of adequate teaching and learning support material; and members of the school management team must nurture and mentor their staff to enhance a positive school climate. Keywords: Continuous professiona l development; cu rriculum; Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement; curriculum change; curriculum development processes; curriculum implementation; foundation phase; foundation phase teachers; school climate; school management team.

© Central University of Technology, Free State

vi

LIST OF ABRREVIATIONS

ANOVA Analysis of variance

C2005 Curriculum 2005

CAPS Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement

CPTD Continuous Professional Training and Development

CT Communication technology

CTA Common Task of Assessment

DBE Department of Basic Education

DOE Department of Education

FAL First Additional Language

FP Foundation Phase

HL Home Language

HOD Head of Department

HSRC Human Sciences Research Council

ICT Information and Communication Technology

INSET In-service Training

IQMS Integrated Quality Management System

IT Information Technology

LF Learning Facilitator

LO Learning Outcomes

LTSM Learning and Teaching Support Material

NCS National Curriculum Statement

NGO Non-Government Organisation

© Central University of Technology, Free State

vii

NP National Party

NQF National Qualification Framework

OBE Outcomes Based Education

OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

RDD Research Development and Diffusion

RNCS Revised National Curriculum Statement

SASA South African Schools Act

SBA School Based Assessment

SGB School Governing Body

SMT School Management Team

SPSS Statistical Packages for Social Sciences

© Central University of Technology, Free State

viii

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF TABLES 2.1 of curriculum implementation 29

2.2 62

3.1 Steps for inductive approach 85

3.2 Steps for deductive approach 86

3.3 Sequential explanatory design 91

3.4 Population and sample 95

4.1 views and their implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement 133

2.1 Instructional time for subjects in the foundation phase 36

2.2 Number of formal assessment tasks in grade 1-3 37

2.3 Weighting of content areas grades 1-3 38

2.4 The weighting of school-based assessment 69

2.5 Scale of achievement for the national curriculum statement grades

R-3 72

4.1 Biographical details of the teachers 116

4.2 statement 117

4.3 The role of foundation phase teachers in the implementation of curriculum

and assessment policy statement 119

© Central University of Technology, Free State

ix

Table of Contents

4.4 The role of the school management team in the implementation of

curriculum and assessment policy statement in the foundation phase 120

4.5 In-service training and continuous professional development of foundation

phase teachers 121

4.6 Assessment of foundation phase learners 122

4.7 Content knowledge of foundation phase teachers 123

4.8 Pedagogy knowledge of foundation phase teachers 124

4.9 The application of inclusive education in the foundation phase 125

4.10 Availability of resources in the foundation phase 126

4.11 School climate 126

4.12 Availability of learning and teaching support material in the foundation

phase 127

4.13 Recoded negatively worded questionnaire items 128

4.14 Questionnaire subscales 129

4.15 CAPS implementation in the foundation phase 130

4.16 The relationship between 134

4.17 Differences between teachers qualified to teach in the foundation phase

and those not qualified in the implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement 136

4.18 The implementation of CAPS according to the age of foundation phase

teachers 137

4.19 The implementation of CAPS according to the teaching experiences of

foundation phase teachers 140

4.20 The implementation of CAPS according to the number of foundation phase

learners in the classroom 143

© Central University of Technology, Free State

x

Declaration ...................................................................................................................... i

Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................... ii

Dedication ..................................................................................................................... iii

Abstract ......................................................................................................................... iv

List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................... vi

List of figures ................................................................................................................ viii

List of tables ................................................................................................................. viii

CHAPTER ONE: ORIENTATION OF THE STUDY

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Background of the study 2

1.3 Problem statement 4

1.4 Research aim and objectives 5

1.4.1 Research questions 5

1.4.2 Research objectives 5

1.5 Hypotheses 6

1.5.1 Group 1 hypotheses 6

1.5.2 Group 2 hypotheses 7

1.5.3 Group 3 hypotheses 7

1.5.4 Group 4 hypotheses 7

1.5.5 Group 5 hypotheses 7

1.6 Purpose of the study 8

1.7 Significance of the study 8

© Central University of Technology, Free State

xi

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

1.8 Preliminary literature review 9

1.9 Definition of terms 11

1.9.1 Curriculum 11

1.9.2 Curriculum and assessment policy statement 12

1.9.3 Foundation phase 12

1.9.4 Continuous professional development 12

1.9.5 School climate

13

1.10 Research design and methodology 13

1.10.1 Research design 13

1.10.2 Research methodology 14

1.11 Population and sample 15

1.11.1 Population 15

1.11.2 Sample 15

1.12 Data collection and research instruments 16

1.12.1 Questionnaire 16

1.12.2 Interviews 17

1.13 Validity, Reliability and Ethical Considerations 18

1.13.1 Validity 18

1.13.2 Reliability 18

1.13.3 Ethical considerations 19

1.14 Data Analysis 20

1.14.1 Data analysis for quantitative research 20

1.14.2 Data analysis for qualitative research 21

1.15 Delimitation of the study 21

1.16 Chapter outline 21

2.1 Introduction 22

2.2 Theoretical framework 22

2.2.1 Process of change 23

2.2.2 Educational change 23

2.2.3 24

2.2.4 Research development and diffusion model 24

2.2.5 26

© Central University of Technology, Free State

xii

2.2.5.1 Profile of implementation 26

2.2.5.2 Capacity to support innovation 27

2.2.5.3 Support from outside agencies 27

2.3 Curriculum development 29

2.4 Curriculum changes in South Africa 30

2.4.1 Curriculum 2005 30

2.4.2 Revised national curriculum statement 32

2.4.3 The introduction of curriculum and assessment policy statement 34

2.4.4 The key changes of the curriculum and assessment policy statement

for the foundation phase 35

2.4.4.1 Instructional time 36

2.4.4.2 Assessment 36

2.4.4.3 Recording and reporting 37

2.4.4.4 Weighting of content areas 38

2.5 The need for curriculum change in South Africa 38

2.6 Curriculum and assessment policy statement for the foundation

Phase 40

2.6.1 The principles of curriculum and assessment policy statement 40

2.6.1.1 Social transformation 41

2.6.1.2 Active and critical learning 41

2.6.1.3 Progression 42

2.6.1.4 High knowledge and high skills 42

2.6.1.5 Human rights, inclusivity, environmental and

social justice 42

2.6.1.6 Recognition of prior learning 43

2.6.1.7 Valuing indigenous knowledge systems 43

2.7 Challenges in curriculum implementation 43

2.7.1 Education policy 44

2.7.2 The role of foundation phase teachers in the

implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement 46

2.7.3 The role of the principal and school management team in the

implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement in the foundation phase 52

2.7.3.1 Motivation as the role of the principal in the implementation

of the curriculum 54

2.7.3.2 The role of the principal in monitoring and

supporting the implementation of the curriculum 55

2.7.3.3 Management of curriculum and instruction in CAPS 57

quotesdbs_dbs19.pdfusesText_25
[PDF] m.ed thesis free download

[PDF] m.ed thesis topics education pdf

[PDF] m14 metro

[PDF] m14 tome 2

[PDF] m42 orion

[PDF] m=c*v

[PDF] m=p/g

[PDF] ma bohème arthur rimbaud analyse linéaire

[PDF] ma bohème commentaire composé

[PDF] ma boheme d'artur rimbaud

[PDF] ma bohème definition

[PDF] ma bohème paroles

[PDF] ma boheme rimbaud

[PDF] ma bohème rimbaud analyse

[PDF] ma bohème rimbaud date