M Ed Research Proposal
This study attempts to provide a picture of what is currently occurring in primary schools pertaining to the challenges that Foundation Phase teachers encounter
Master of Education (M Ed) - (By Coursework and Research Report
submit a research proposal. However students with a background in postgraduate research in the. Humanities and Social Sciences may be exempted from attendance
TNTEU - Submission of M.Ed. (Semester-I) Research Proposals for
I am by direction to inform you that the Colleges of Education affiliated to Tamil Nadu. Teachers Education University
Submission of M.Ed Research Proposals for (2018-2020) Batch
30 nov. 2018 The Principal's of Colleges of Education offering M.Ed. Programme. SirlMadam. Sub: TNTEU- Submission of M.Ed Research Proposals for ...
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF A M.ED. THESIS
29 sept. 2010 the faculty of education office of Graduate programs and research ... Approval of M.Ed. Thesis Proposal - Form A located on the Forms ...
Searchable Listing of M.Ed. Thesis/Projects
Searchable Listing of M.Ed. Thesis/Projects. Number. Assigned Research. Project. 62. Jul-98 Hinkley Gina ... A Curriculum Proposal for Placing High-.
FACULTY OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
The TwoYear Master of Education (M.Ed.) is a professional programme Every candidate shall be required to submit a research proposal in the First.
Guidebook
Applying for an M.Ed. degree. 5. Admission Requirements. 5. How To Apply. 5-5. Mainly by research Programmes of Study. 7. Research Proposal.
Untitled
has accepted the Revised Syllabus of M.Ed. Two Years Degree Course Ist to (Preparation of research proposal and its presentation).
MEd (09250004)
All master's students must submit a dissertation or a mini-dissertation and must pass Research Proposal (NMQ. 800). For the MEd research degree programmes
WHEN IMPLEMENTING THE CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENT
POLICY STATEMENT IN THE FOUNDATION PHASE
byPEARL TABEA MOROLONG
Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the DegreeMASTER OF EDUCATION
in theFaculty of Humanities
at theCentral University of Technology, Free State
Supervisor: Dr AM RAMBUDA, PhD (Subject Didactics)WELKOM
SEPTEMBER 2019
© Central University of Technology, Free State
iDECLARATION WITH REGARD TO
INDEPENDENT WORK
I, Pearl Tabea Morolong, of student number , do hereby declare that this research project submitted to the Central University of Technology, Free State for the Degree: Master of Education, is my own independent work; and complies with the Code of Academic Integrity, as well as other relevant policies, procedures, rules and regulations of the Central University of Technology, Free State; and has not been submitted before to any institution by myself or any other person in fulfilment (or partial fulfilment) of the requirements for the attainment of any qualification. _______________________ _______________ SIGNATURE OF STUDENT DATE© Central University of Technology, Free State
iiACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank God Almighty for giving me the ability, courage and perservarance to undertake and complete this study. I would also like to acknowledge the following people for their contribution to this study: My supervisor; Dr. Awelani Rambuda for his professional guidance, academic knowledge, support and motivation throughout this research study. My beloved mother for her patience, prayers, unconditional love and support which has been the foundation of my endeavours. My husband; Gift Morolong for his unwavering love, support, understanding and encouragement during the periods when I needed it the most. My children; Keneilwe, Reabetswe and Kamohelo who sacrificed moments of quality family time during my pursuit of this project as well as my extended family for their kindness and support. All the teachers for their cooperation and valuable contribution and to the principals who allowed their schools to participate in the research study. Finally, I wish to acknowledge the financial contribution of Central University of Technology, Free State for ena bling the completion of this study. It is output.© Central University of Technology, Free State
iiiDEDICATION
I dedicate this study to my beloved late father; MANDE DENNIS MATHIBE, who taught me the value of hard work and for inspiring me to pursue my goals in life and to my dear late sister; MASEGO MATHIBE for always believing in me and for her endless love. May their memories forever be a comfort and a blessing.© Central University of Technology, Free State
ivABSTRACT
The South African education system has been evolving since the democratically elected government came into power in 1994. As a result, a number of curriculum reforms have been introduced within a short space of time. Curriculum change impacts on the work of the teachers who are at the forefront of curriculum innovation and implementation. This study attempts to provide a picture of what is currently occurring in primary schools pe rtaining to th e challenges th at Fou ndation Ph ase t eachers encounter when they implement Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) in the classroom. The understanding of the curriculum and how it impacts on their teaching practice. The literature review revealed that curriculum change is inevitable because in order to keep up with the needs of a constantly changing society, it also has to change. The question that captivated the researcher regarding curriculum change is how the teachers view th is chan ge and t heir experiences when im plementing t he new curriculum. The literat ure re viewed also revealed that, in any curr iculum cha nge, teachers as curriculum implementers should be involved in curriculum development processes and should undergo extensive training before the envisaged curriculum can be implemented. Furthermore, teachers should be exposed to continuous professional development so that they can be informe d on dev elopment s and i ncrease their knowledge and skills, which will result in quality teaching and learning. The stu dy employe d a sequential explanatory mixed method research design. This design afforded the research er an o pportunity to o btain in-depth knowledg e and understanding of the challenges Foundation Phase teachers experience when they implement CAPS. The findings of the study reveal that there is a statistically significant relationship between Foundation Phase CAPS. The results also reveal that the implementation of CAPS in the Foundation Phase is a burden; it is difficult and time consuming to implement CAPS in the FoundationPhase; there is lack of the school management t
© Central University of Technology, Free State
v of CAPS; there is lack of in-service training; scastructure does not provide learners with a safe and healthy learning envir onment, there is minim al pa rental involvement at schools; there is lack of teaching and learning support material; there are overcrowded classrooms; progressed learners frustrate effective teaching and lastly, there is lack of teacher initiative. This research recommends that before a new curriculum is implemented, thorough research must be done along with an analysis to check the viability and implications of the curriculum in the South African context; assistant teachers should be introduced in the So uth African e ducation system to reduce the admin istration load of teach ers; teachers should receive training in the teaching of learners with learning barriers; there should be a re; there should be a provision of adequate teaching and learning support material; and members of the school management team must nurture and mentor their staff to enhance a positive school climate. Keywords: Continuous professiona l development; cu rriculum; Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement; curriculum change; curriculum development processes; curriculum implementation; foundation phase; foundation phase teachers; school climate; school management team.© Central University of Technology, Free State
viLIST OF ABRREVIATIONS
ANOVA Analysis of variance
C2005 Curriculum 2005
CAPS Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement
CPTD Continuous Professional Training and DevelopmentCT Communication technology
CTA Common Task of Assessment
DBE Department of Basic Education
DOE Department of Education
FAL First Additional Language
FP Foundation Phase
HL Home Language
HOD Head of Department
HSRC Human Sciences Research Council
ICT Information and Communication Technology
INSET In-service Training
IQMS Integrated Quality Management System
IT Information Technology
LF Learning Facilitator
LO Learning Outcomes
LTSM Learning and Teaching Support Material
NCS National Curriculum Statement
NGO Non-Government Organisation
© Central University of Technology, Free State
viiNP National Party
NQF National Qualification Framework
OBE Outcomes Based Education
OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentRDD Research Development and Diffusion
RNCS Revised National Curriculum Statement
SASA South African Schools Act
SBA School Based Assessment
SGB School Governing Body
SMT School Management Team
SPSS Statistical Packages for Social Sciences
© Central University of Technology, Free State
viiiLIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES 2.1 of curriculum implementation 292.2 62
3.1 Steps for inductive approach 85
3.2 Steps for deductive approach 86
3.3 Sequential explanatory design 91
3.4 Population and sample 95
4.1 views and their implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement 1332.1 Instructional time for subjects in the foundation phase 36
2.2 Number of formal assessment tasks in grade 1-3 37
2.3 Weighting of content areas grades 1-3 38
2.4 The weighting of school-based assessment 69
2.5 Scale of achievement for the national curriculum statement grades
R-3 72
4.1 Biographical details of the teachers 116
4.2 statement 1174.3 The role of foundation phase teachers in the implementation of curriculum
and assessment policy statement 119© Central University of Technology, Free State
ixTable of Contents
4.4 The role of the school management team in the implementation of
curriculum and assessment policy statement in the foundation phase 1204.5 In-service training and continuous professional development of foundation
phase teachers 1214.6 Assessment of foundation phase learners 122
4.7 Content knowledge of foundation phase teachers 123
4.8 Pedagogy knowledge of foundation phase teachers 124
4.9 The application of inclusive education in the foundation phase 125
4.10 Availability of resources in the foundation phase 126
4.11 School climate 126
4.12 Availability of learning and teaching support material in the foundation
phase 1274.13 Recoded negatively worded questionnaire items 128
4.14 Questionnaire subscales 129
4.15 CAPS implementation in the foundation phase 130
4.16 The relationship between 134
4.17 Differences between teachers qualified to teach in the foundation phase
and those not qualified in the implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement 1364.18 The implementation of CAPS according to the age of foundation phase
teachers 1374.19 The implementation of CAPS according to the teaching experiences of
foundation phase teachers 1404.20 The implementation of CAPS according to the number of foundation phase
learners in the classroom 143© Central University of Technology, Free State
xDeclaration ...................................................................................................................... i
Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................... ii
Dedication ..................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract ......................................................................................................................... iv
List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................... vi
List of figures ................................................................................................................ viii
List of tables ................................................................................................................. viii
CHAPTER ONE: ORIENTATION OF THE STUDY
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Background of the study 2
1.3 Problem statement 4
1.4 Research aim and objectives 5
1.4.1 Research questions 5
1.4.2 Research objectives 5
1.5 Hypotheses 6
1.5.1 Group 1 hypotheses 6
1.5.2 Group 2 hypotheses 7
1.5.3 Group 3 hypotheses 7
1.5.4 Group 4 hypotheses 7
1.5.5 Group 5 hypotheses 7
1.6 Purpose of the study 8
1.7 Significance of the study 8
© Central University of Technology, Free State
xiCHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
1.8 Preliminary literature review 9
1.9 Definition of terms 11
1.9.1 Curriculum 11
1.9.2 Curriculum and assessment policy statement 12
1.9.3 Foundation phase 12
1.9.4 Continuous professional development 12
1.9.5 School climate
131.10 Research design and methodology 13
1.10.1 Research design 13
1.10.2 Research methodology 14
1.11 Population and sample 15
1.11.1 Population 15
1.11.2 Sample 15
1.12 Data collection and research instruments 16
1.12.1 Questionnaire 16
1.12.2 Interviews 17
1.13 Validity, Reliability and Ethical Considerations 18
1.13.1 Validity 18
1.13.2 Reliability 18
1.13.3 Ethical considerations 19
1.14 Data Analysis 20
1.14.1 Data analysis for quantitative research 20
1.14.2 Data analysis for qualitative research 21
1.15 Delimitation of the study 21
1.16 Chapter outline 21
2.1 Introduction 22
2.2 Theoretical framework 22
2.2.1 Process of change 23
2.2.2 Educational change 23
2.2.3 24
2.2.4 Research development and diffusion model 24
2.2.5 26
© Central University of Technology, Free State
xii2.2.5.1 Profile of implementation 26
2.2.5.2 Capacity to support innovation 27
2.2.5.3 Support from outside agencies 27
2.3 Curriculum development 29
2.4 Curriculum changes in South Africa 30
2.4.1 Curriculum 2005 30
2.4.2 Revised national curriculum statement 32
2.4.3 The introduction of curriculum and assessment policy statement 34
2.4.4 The key changes of the curriculum and assessment policy statement
for the foundation phase 352.4.4.1 Instructional time 36
2.4.4.2 Assessment 36
2.4.4.3 Recording and reporting 37
2.4.4.4 Weighting of content areas 38
2.5 The need for curriculum change in South Africa 38
2.6 Curriculum and assessment policy statement for the foundation
Phase 40
2.6.1 The principles of curriculum and assessment policy statement 40
2.6.1.1 Social transformation 41
2.6.1.2 Active and critical learning 41
2.6.1.3 Progression 42
2.6.1.4 High knowledge and high skills 42
2.6.1.5 Human rights, inclusivity, environmental and
social justice 422.6.1.6 Recognition of prior learning 43
2.6.1.7 Valuing indigenous knowledge systems 43
2.7 Challenges in curriculum implementation 43
2.7.1 Education policy 44
2.7.2 The role of foundation phase teachers in the
implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement 462.7.3 The role of the principal and school management team in the
implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement in the foundation phase 522.7.3.1 Motivation as the role of the principal in the implementation
of the curriculum 542.7.3.2 The role of the principal in monitoring and
supporting the implementation of the curriculum 552.7.3.3 Management of curriculum and instruction in CAPS 57
quotesdbs_dbs19.pdfusesText_25[PDF] m.ed thesis topics education pdf
[PDF] m14 metro
[PDF] m14 tome 2
[PDF] m42 orion
[PDF] m=c*v
[PDF] m=p/g
[PDF] ma bohème arthur rimbaud analyse linéaire
[PDF] ma bohème commentaire composé
[PDF] ma boheme d'artur rimbaud
[PDF] ma bohème definition
[PDF] ma bohème paroles
[PDF] ma boheme rimbaud
[PDF] ma bohème rimbaud analyse
[PDF] ma bohème rimbaud date