[PDF] gusset plate design utilizing block-shear concepts





Previous PDF Next PDF



Analysis and Design Procedure of Corner Gusset Plate Connection

Abstract: In order to achieve the post buckling strength of BRB member AISC seismic design provisions require that gusset plate axial capacity exceed 



SCBF GUSSET PLATE CONNECTION DESIGN

Performance based seismic design (PBSD) is a formalized procedure for meeting these multiple design objectives. Special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs) are 



1 Introduction

Proposed design procedure for gusset plate dimensions and force distribution at its interfaces to beam and column. Samira Ebrahimia samira.ebrahimi@ut.ac.ir.



Seismic design of braced frame gusset plate connections

brace. Figure 3: Gusset plate connection. 2 Proposed design procedure. To meet these diverse objectives a seismic design methodology based on.



Analysis and Design Procedure of Corner Gusset Plate Connection

Finally a design method accompanied by some design charts for rectangular type gusset plates subject to compression is proposed based on an inelastic plate 



Analysis and Design Procedure of Corner Gusset Plate Connection

Abstract: In order to achieve the post buckling strength of BRB member AISC seismic design provisions require that gusset plate axial capacity exceed 



ANALYSIS OF BEAM-COLUMN-GUSSET COMPONENTS IN 5

Finally a practical design procedure of thickness of gusset plate based on equivalent strut action is proposed for gusset plate subjected combined damper 



DESIGN OF COLUMN BASE SLAB BASE:

Where Design bearing strength of concrete = 0.45fck fck = characteristic strength of concrete. STEP 2: ASSUME THICK. OF GUSSET PLATE (SAY 16MM) AND GUSSET 



Seismic Design of Steel Special Concentrically Braced Frame Systems

Furthermore the current connection design procedures do not always assure ductile behavior. As noted earlier



gusset plate design utilizing block-shear concepts

strength design procedure for gusset plates loaded in tension. Twenty-eight gusset plates reflecting different strength parameters

I "------.J

GUSSET DESIGN

UTILIZING

AAI012

7194
by

Steve G. Hardash

Reidar 8jarhovde

The

Deportment of Civil Engineering

ond Engineering Mechanics THE

UNIVERSITY

Tucson, Arizona 85721

August 1984

I

GUSSET PLATE DESIGN UTILIZING

by

Steve G. Hardash

and

Reidar Bjorhovde

Department of Civil Engineering

and Engineering Hechanics

THE UNIVERSITY

Tucson, Arizona 85721

August 1984

I

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report was funded by a grant from the American Institute of Steel Construction, for which the authors are sincerely appreciative. Also, the interaction with Dr. R. M. Richard is appreciated. Special thanks are due Messrs. Mun-Foo Leong and A. E. Moussa for the laboratory assistance, and to our shop personnel, Messrs. W. D. Lichtenwalter and L. Lujan, for their skills rendered. iii I

TABLE OF

1. INTRODUCTION.

2. SCOPE

3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

PREVIOUS

THE BLOCK-SHEAR

5.1 Design of Test Specimens

5.2 Description of Fabricated Test Specimens and

Materials. . • . . . . . .

5.3 Test Set-Up and Instrumentation.

5.4 Test Procedure

TEST

6.1 Results During Testing

6.2 Failure Modes for Test Specimens

A STRENGTH

7.1 Previous Test Results.

7.2 Strength Model Parameters.

7.3 Investigation of the Four Basic Block-Shear Models

7.4 Modification of the Net Tensile --Gross Shear

Strength Model . • . . . . . . • . .

7.5 Refinement of Strength Model ...•...

7.6 Investigation of Effects of Other

Parameters . • . . . . • . • . . . . .

7.7 Summary and Final Proposed Strength Model.

iv Page vi ix x 1 3 4 9 16 16 18 21
25
31
31
35
40
43
52
60
64
68
78
I

TABLE OF --Continued

8. RESISTANCE TENSILE GUSSET

9. APPLICATION DESIGN OF

9.1 Development of Design Curves .....

9.2

Illustrative Analysis and Design Problem.

10. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS RESEARCH.

10.1

Summary . . .. .•...

Recommendations for Future Research

APPENDIX A: LOAD-DEFORMATION DATA AND TEST SPECIMENT

DETAILS FOR THE PRESENT

APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS TEST SPECIMENS AFTER

TESTING FOR THE PRESENT

v Page 83
83
85
89
89
90
92
121
136
I

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

I

Figure

3.1 Page Whitmore Criterion for Determining Effective Width. 5 I

3.2 Gusset Plate Detail . . . . . . . . . . . • . 7

4.1 Block-Shear Model of Failure for a Coped Beam Web 11

I

4.2 Modified Block-Shear Model of Failure for a Coped

Beam Web. . . . . . . •.• 13

I

4.3 Proposed Block-Shear Model for Gusset Plates. 15

I 5.1

5.2 General Gusset Test Plate Configuration . . 17

Fabrication Details for the Test Connection Splice

Plates. • 22

I

5.3 Fabrication Details for the Fixed End Splice Plates

and Bearing Assemblies .• 23 I

5.4 Instrumentation for Test Plates Nos. 1, 2, and 3. 26

I 5.5

5.6 Instrumentation for Test Plates Nos. 4 to 28. 27

Front and Side View of a Typical Test Set-up. 28

I

5.7 Test Set-up for Test Plate No. 28 . . 29

6.1 Load-Deformation Curve for Test Plate No. 28. 32

I

6.2 Growth of Yield Lines During Testing of Plate No. 28. 34

I 6.3

6.4 Test Plate No. 28 at the End of the Loading Cycle 36

TWo Basic Failure Modes for the Gusset Test Plates. 38 I

6.5 Test Plate No. 18 at the End of the Loading Cycle 39

7.1

Fabrication Details for Test Connection ADl 41

I

7.2 Failure Mode for Test Connection ADl. . 42

I vi I Figure 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9

7.10(a)

7.10(b)

7.10(c)

7.10(d)

7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14

LIST --Continued

Fabrication Details for the Test

Plates Which Failed During the

of Illinois Study

Connection Gusset

1963 University

Failure Modes for Two of the Gusset Plates Tested

During the 1963 University of Illinois Study . .

General Test Set-up for the University of Alberta

Study. . . • . • . • . . . . . . . . . • . • Fabrication Details for the 30· and 60· Bracing Angle Gusset Plate . . . • . . . . . . . . .

Fabrication Details for the 45· Bracing Angle

Gu sset Plate . . . . . . . • . • . . .

General Load-Deformation Daigram Showing Contribu

tion of Tensile Resistance and Shear Resistance in the Ultimate Strength Model

Four Baisc Free Body Sections ..

Professional Factor Using Tensile Gross Area and

Shear Gross Area . . . . . . . . . . . •

Professional Factor Using Tensile Net Area and

Shear Gross Area • . . . . • . . . . . .

Professional Factor Using Tensile Gross Area and

Shear Net Area • . . . . . . . . . . . .

Professional Factor Using Tensile Net Area and

Shear Net Area • . . • . . • . . .

Values of the Connection Length Factor to Give

P 1.0, Expressed as a Function of the

Connection Length. . • . . • . . . . . .•

Professional Factor vs. Connection Length Using

42 Data Points . • . . . • . • .

Least Squares Lines for 39 and 42 Data Points.

Professional Factor vs. Connection Length Using

39 Data Points . . . . . . . • . • . . . . • .

vii Page 44
45
46
47
48
51
53
56
57
58
59
62
63
66
67
I

Figure

7.15 I 7.16 7.17

I 7.18

I 7.19 7.20 I 7.21 7.22 I 7.23 I 9.1 I 9.2 I

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS --Continued

Professional Factor vs. Edge Distance.

Professional Factor vs. Bolt Pitch .

Professional Factor vs. Outside Bolt Gage.

Professional Factor vs. Plate Thickness.

Professional Factor vs. Fastener Size.

Professional Factor vs. Plate Geometry

Professional Factor vs. Plate Material Yield Stress.

Professional Factor vs. Plate Material Ultimate

Tensile Stress . • . • . • . . . •

Factor vs. Plate Material Yield

Stress to Ultimate Tensile Stress Ratio.

Design Curves for A36 Steel Plate Material

Details of the Gusset Plate Connection to be

Designed

viii Page 69
70
7l 72
73
74
75
76
77
84
86
I

LIST OF TABLES

5.1 Test Connection Details for the Present Study.

7.1 Test Connection Details for Previous Studies.

7.2 Observed Ultimate Load for Each Test Specimen.

ix Page 19 49
55
I. I

ABSTRACT

The prime object of this study is to develop an ultimate strength design procedure for gusset plates loaded in tension. Twenty-eight gusset plates, reflecting different strength parameters, were tested to failure, and the results are presented in this study. Utilizing the results from these tests along with the results from previous ultimate strength tests, a block-shear model incorpora ting tensile ultimate stress on the net area between the last row of bolts and an effective uniform shear stress on the gross area along the outside bolt lines is shown to be the most realistic ultimate strength model. The effective uniform shear stress is shown to be a linear function of the total connection length. A value for the resistance factor, of 0.85 is determined using the proposed strength model. Design curves for A36 steel are presented, along with a sample gusset plate design problem. x I

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Gusset plates are common fastening elements used in fabri cated steel structures such as trusses or braced-frame structures. In the latter case, their primary purpose is to transfer either tensile or compressive loads from a bracing member to a beam and column joint. Current gusset plate design is based primarily on elastic analyses for determining critical sections and stresses. No known failures or adverse behavior have been noted, but substantial dif ferences in the factor of safety against ultimate load exist because of the assumptions involved [1]. It is therefore important to de velop an improved design method, with the goal of providing economy of design by means of a consistent factor of safety. The ultimate strength approach would fulfill this requirement for a consistent design and analysis method. To date, a few experi mental studies have been conducted to determine the behavior and ultimate strength of gusset plate connections. However, additional tests are needed to develop a design method based on ultimate strength behavior. 1 I I 2 I With the above in mind, a series of gusset plate tests were conducted at the University of Arizona. The results of these and I previous ultimate strength tests are presented in this study, from I which a practical design method is developed. I I' I

CHAPTER 2

SCOPE The development of a design and analysis procedure for gusset plates, based on ultimate strength, will be accomplished by the following:

1. Test to failure in tension 28 simple gusset plate models,

to determine failure modes and ultimate loads. Each plate will reflect different strength parameters, consisting of gage between lines of bolts, edge distance to first bolt, bolt pitch in bolt lines, and number of bolts in a line. 2. 3. Propose various block-shear models and compare the theoretical results to the actual ultimate loads for the tests conducted in this study and previous studies. Select the block-shear model, with modifications if necessary, that most accurately predicts the ultimate strength of the tested gusset plates. Develop a design and analysis procedure for tensile gusset plate connections, based on the Load and Resistance Factor

Design (LRFD) format.

The behavior of gusset plate connections is very complex. However, considering the behavior of these connections at ultimate load will assist in the development of a design procedure which in corporates elastic as well as ultimate strength considerations. 3 I

CHAPTER J

PREVIOUS

connections have been an area of research since 1837. At that time, riveted flat-plate joints, such as those used in tanks and boilers, were considered. Since the late 1800's, long span structures have been common, and these incorporated truss-type members; hence, truss-type plate connections became an important topic of study up to the mid 1960's. The first detailed studies of gusset plate behavior only considered elastic response, and these will be described briefly. One of the first significant elastic experimental analyses was conducted by Whitmore on a Warren truss joint [2]. Analyses showed that the maximum tensile and compressive stresses were locatedquotesdbs_dbs6.pdfusesText_12
[PDF] design statement examples engineering

[PDF] dessin a colorier et a imprimer

[PDF] dessin industriel pdf exercices

[PDF] details of the selected packet header window

[PDF] details overleaf meaning in hindi

[PDF] determine if functions are linearly independent

[PDF] determine the fourier series representations for the following signals

[PDF] determine the z transform including the region of convergence

[PDF] déterminer l'ensemble des solutions de l'équation

[PDF] deux droites sécantes dans lespace

[PDF] develop a new class called bank account

[PDF] développement langage bébé 19 mois

[PDF] devoir commun seconde nourrir les hommes

[PDF] devoir geo seconde nourrir les hommes

[PDF] devoir maison maths 1ere s trigonométrie