Comparing GATT and GATS: Regime creation under and after
Trade policy; international regimes; hegemony; multilateral negotiations; services; GATT. According to hegemonic stability theory1 the creation and maintenance.
Agriculture GATT
https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/40898/32573_aer771l_002.pdf?v=0
An Economic Theory of GATT
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in there would be no reason for the creation of ... I BAGWELL AND STAIGER: AN ECONOMIC THEORY OF GATT 217.
On the Effects of GATT/WTO Membership on Trade: They are
GATT Uruguay. Round completed. Creation of WTO. (117 countries). (164 members as of 2019). 2001. Doha Round launched. 1949. Annecy Round completed.
The History and Future of the World Trade Organization
GATT after the Second World War. Some see the later creation of the WTO as part of the. “peace dividend” that came with the end of the Cold War.
Comparing GATT and GATS: Regime Creation under and after
Trade policy; international regimes; hegemony; multilateral negotiations; services; GATT. According to hegemonic stability theory' the creation and maintenance.
THE ATTLEE GOVERNMENT AND THE CREATION OF THE GATT
Tariffs and Trade (GATT). This supposedly interim agreement which was meant to provide a framework for tariff reductions in advance of the creation of the
Untitled
Whereas GATT had mainly dealt with trade in goods the WTO and its agreements now cover trade in services
CERTAIN MEASURES AFFECTING THE RENEWABLE ENERGY
06-May-2013 ... renewable energy generation equipment than accorded to like products of Ontario origin in violation of Article III:4 of the GATT 1994;.
UG365: GATT Configurator Users Guide for Bluetooth® SDK v2.x
It also supports creating importing
WT/DS412/AB/RWT/DS426/AB/R
6 May 2013
(13-2400) Page: 1/154Original: English
CANADA - CERTAIN MEASURES AFFECTING THE RENEWABLE ENERGYGENERATION SECTOR
CANADA - MEASURES RELATING TO THE FEED-IN TARIFF PROGRAMAB-2013-1
Reports of the Appellate Body
Note by the Secretariat:
The Appellate Body is issuing these Reports in th
e form of a single document constituting two separate Appellate Body Reports: WT/DS412/AB/R and WT/DS426/AB/R. The cover page, preliminary pages, sections 1 through 5 and the annexes are common to both Reports. The page header throughout the document bears the two document symbols WT/DS412/AB/R and WT/DS426/AB/R, with the following exceptions: section 6 on pages JPN-141 and JPN-142, which bears the document symbol for and contains the Appellate Body's findings and conclusions in the Appellate Body Report WT/DS412/AB/R; and section 6 on pages EU-143 and EU-144, which bears the document symbol for and contains the Appellate Body's findings and conclusions in theAppellate Body Report WT/DS426/AB/R.
WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 2 -Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 15
2 ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTICIPANTS AND THIRD PARTICIPANTS ..................... 25
2.1 Claims of error by Canada - Appellant .............................................................. 25
2.1.1 Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ........................................................................... 25
2.1.2 Article 11 of the DSU - "Commercial resale" ........................................................... 27
2.2 Arguments of Japan - Appellee ......................................................................... 30
2.2.1 Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ........................................................................... 30
2.2.2 Article 11 of the DSU - "Commercial resale" ........................................................... 31
2.3 Arguments of the European Union - Appellee ................................................... 32
2.3.1 Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ........................................................................... 32
2.3.2 Article 11 of the DSU - "Commercial resale" ........................................................... 34
2.4 Claims of error by Japan - Other appellant ....................................................... 37
2.4.1 The order in which the Panel dealt with Japan's claims under the
SCM Agreement and its claims under the TRIMs Agreement and the GATT 1994 ........... 372.4.2 Claims under Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ........................................................ 38
2.4.2.1 The Panel's finding that the FIT Programme and Contracts involve "procurement
by governmental agencies of products purchased" ................................................... 38
2.4.2.2 The Panel's interpretation of the word "for" in term "for governmental purposes" ......... 39
2.4.2.3 The Panel's interpretation and application of the term "with a view to
commercial resale" .............................................................................................. 40
2.4.3 The Panel's decision to exercise judicial economy with respect to Japan's
"stand-alone" claim under Article III:4 of the GATT 1994 .......................................... 41
2.4.4 Claims under the SCM Agreement ......................................................................... 42
2.4.4.1 Article 1.1(a) - "Financial contribution" or "income or price support" .......................... 42
2.4.4.2 Article 1.1(b) - "Benefit" ...................................................................................... 44
2.4.4.3 Article 11 of the DSU - "Benefit" ........................................................................... 47
2.5 Claims of error by the European Union - Other appellant ................................. 48
2.5.1 The relationship between the TRIMs Agreement and Article III:4 of the
GATT 1994 ......................................................................................................... 48
2.5.2 Claims under Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ........................................................ 49
2.5.2.1 The Panel's finding that the domestic content requirements "govern"
procurement of electricity .................................................................................... 50
2.5.2.2 The Panel's interpretation of the term "governmental purposes" ................................ 51
2.5.3 Claims under the SCM Agreement ......................................................................... 52
2.5.3.1 Article 1.1(b) - "Benefit" ...................................................................................... 52
2.5.3.2 Article 11 of the DSU - "Benefit" ........................................................................... 54
2.6 Arguments of Canada - Appellee ...................................................................... 56
2.6.1 The order in which the Panel dealt with Japan's claims under the
SCM Agreement and its claims under the TRIMs Agreement and the GATT 1994 ........... 562.6.2 The relationship between the TRIMs Agreement and Article III:4 of the
GATT 1994 ......................................................................................................... 56
2.6.3 Claims under Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ........................................................ 57
2.6.3.1 The Panel's finding that the FIT Programme and Contracts involve "procurement
by governmental agencies of products purchased" ................................................... 57
2.6.3.2 The Panel's finding that the domestic content requirements "govern" the
procurement of electricity .................................................................................... 58
2.6.3.3 The Panel's interpretation of the term "governmental purposes" ................................ 58
2.6.3.4 The Panel's interpretation of the word "for" in the term "for governmental
purposes" .......................................................................................................... 59
2.6.3.5 The Panel's interpretation of the term "with a view to commercial resale" .................... 59
2.6.3.6 Canada's request for completion of the analysis ....................................................... 60
WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 3 -2.6.4 The Panel's decision to exercise judicial economy with respect to Japan's
"stand-alone" claim under Article III:4 of the GATT 1994 .......................................... 61
2.6.5 Claims under the SCM Agreement ......................................................................... 61
2.6.5.1 Article 1.1(a) - "Financial contribution" or "income or price support" .......................... 61
2.6.5.2 Article 1.1(b) - "Benefit" ...................................................................................... 63
2.6.5.3 Article 11 of the DSU - "Benefit" ........................................................................... 65
2.7 Arguments of the third participants .................................................................. 66
2.7.1 Australia ............................................................................................................ 66
2.7.2 Brazil ................................................................................................................ 67
2.7.3 China ................................................................................................................ 68
2.7.4 India ................................................................................................................. 69
2.7.5 Norway ............................................................................................................. 69
2.7.6 Saudi Arabia ...................................................................................................... 69
2.7.7 Turkey .............................................................................................................. 70
2.7.8 United States ..................................................................................................... 70
3 ISSUES RAISED IN THIS APPEAL ...................................................................... 73
4 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW OF THE MEASURES AT ISSUE ........................... 74
4.1 Electricity networks .......................................................................................... 74
4.2 Ontario's electricity market .............................................................................. 76
4.3 The FIT Programme .......................................................................................... 81
5 ANALYSIS OF THE APPELLATE BODY ................................................................. 83
5.1 The order in which the Panel dealt with Japan's claims under the
SCM Agreement and its claims under the TRIMs Agreement and theGATT 1994 ........................................................................................................ 83
5.2 The applicability of Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 to measures
falling under Article 2.2 of the TRIMs Agreement and the IllustrativeList annexed thereto ......................................................................................... 85
5.2.1 The Panel's findings ............................................................................................. 86
5.2.2 Claims and arguments on appeal ........................................................................... 87
5.2.3 Is Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 applicable to measures falling within the
scope of Article 2.2 of the TRIMs Agreement and the Illustrative List annexedthereto? ............................................................................................................ 88
5.3 Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ..................................................................... 91
5.3.1 The Panel's findings ............................................................................................. 91
5.3.2 Claims and arguments on appeal ........................................................................... 94
5.3.3 Interpretation of Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 ................................................... 96
5.3.4 Application of Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 to the facts of these disputes ............ 101
5.4 Did the Panel properly exercise judicial economy when it declined to
make a finding under Japan's "stand-alone" claim under Article III:4 ofthe GATT 1994? .............................................................................................. 103
5.5 Claims under the SCM Agreement ................................................................... 108
5.5.1 Article 1.1(a) - "Financial contribution" or "income or price support" ........................ 108
5.5.1.1 The Panel's findings ........................................................................................... 109
5.5.1.2 Whether the Panel erred in finding that the FIT Programme and Contracts are
government "purchases [of] goods" under Article 1.1(a)(1)(iii) of theSCM Agreement ................................................................................................ 110
5.5.1.3 Did the Panel err in exercising judicial economy with respect to the allegations
that the measures at issue constitute "income or price support"? ............................. 116WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 4 -5.5.2 Article 1.1(b) - "Benefit" .................................................................................... 117
5.5.2.1 The Panel's findings ........................................................................................... 119
5.5.2.2 Whether the Panel erred in finding that the European Union and Japan failed to
establish that the challenged measures confer a benefit within the meaning ofArticle 1.1(b) of the SCM Agreement .................................................................... 121
5.5.2.3 Whether the Panel acted inconsistently with Article 11 of the DSU in finding that
the European Union and Japan failed to establish that the challenged measures confer a benefit within the meaning of Article 1.1(b) of the SCM Agreement .............. 1345.5.2.4 Completion of the analysis ................................................................................. 134
6 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE APPELLATE BODY REPORT
WT/DS412/AB/R ..................................................................................... JPN-141
6 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE APPELLATE BODY REPORT
WT/DS426/AB/R ....................................................................................... EU-143
ANNEX 1 NOTIFICATION OF AN APPEAL BY CANADA ................................................... 145 ANNEX 2 NOTIFICATION OF AN OTHER APPEAL BY JAPAN ........................................... 146 ANNEX 3 NOTIFICATION OF AN OTHER APPEAL BY THE EUROPEAN UNION .................... 149 ANNEX 4 PROCEDURAL RULING BY THE APPELLATE BODY ........................................... 152WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 5 -CASES CITED IN THESE REPORTS
Short Title Full Case Title and Citation
Australia - Salmon Appellate Body Report, Australia - Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/AB/R, adopted 6 November 1998, DSR 1998:VIII, p. 3327 Brazil - Retreaded Tyres Appellate Body Report, Brazil - Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres, WT/DS332/AB/R, adopted 17 December 2007,DSR 2007:IV, 1527
Canada - Aircraft Appellate Body Report, Canada - Measures Affecting the Export of Civilian Aircraft, WT/DS70/AB/R, adopted 20 August 1999,DSR 1999:III, 1377
Canada - Aircraft
(Article 21.5 - Brazil) Appellate Body Report, Canada - Measures Affecting the Export of Civilian Aircraft - Recourse by Brazil to Article 21.5 of the DSU, WT/DS70/AB/RW, adopted 4 August 2000, DSR 2000:IX, p. 4299 Canada - Autos Appellate Body Report, Canada - Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry, WT/DS139/AB/R, WT/DS142/AB/R, adopted19 June 2000, DSR 2000:VI, 2985
Canada - Autos Panel Report, Canada - Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry, WT/DS139/R, WT/DS142/R, adopted 19 June 2000, as modified by Appellate Body Report WT/DS139/AB/R,WT/DS142/AB/R, DSR 2000:VII, 3043
Canada - Dairy Appellate Body Report, Canada - Measures Affecting the Importation of Milk and the Exportation of Dairy Products, WT/DS103/AB/R, WT/DS113/AB/R and Corr.1, adopted 27 October 1999, DSR 1999:V, p. 2057Canada - Feed-in Tariff
Program
Panel Report, Canada - Measures Relating to the Feed-in Tariff Program, WT/DS426/R and Add.1, circulated to WTO Members19 December 2012
Canada - Periodicals Appellate Body Report, Canada - Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals, WT/DS31/AB/R, adopted 30 July 1997, DSR 1997:I, 449Canada - Renewable
Energy
Panel Report, Canada - Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation Sector, WT/DS412/R and Add.1, circulated toWTO Members 19 December 2012
Canada - Wheat Exports
and Grain Imports Appellate Body Report, Canada - Measures Relating to Exports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain, WT/DS276/AB/R, adopted27 September 2004, DSR 2004:VI, p. 2739
Canada - Wheat Exports
and Grain Imports Panel Report, Canada - Measures Relating to Exports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain, WT/DS276/R, adopted27 September 2004, upheld by Appellate Body Report
WT/DS276/AB/R, DSR 2004:VI, 2817
Chile - Price Band System Appellate Body Report, Chile - Price Band System and Safeguard Measures Relating to Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS207/AB/R, adopted 23 October 2002, DSR 2002:VIII, 3045 (Corr.1,DSR 2006:XII, 5473)
China - Auto Parts Appellate Body Reports, China - Measures Affecting Imports ofAutomobile Parts, WT/DS339/AB/R / WT/DS340/AB/R /
WT/DS342/AB/R, adopted 12 January 2009, DSR 2009:I, p. 3WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 6 -Short Title Full Case Title and Citation
China - Intellectual
Property Rights Panel Report, China - Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, WT/DS362/R, adopted20 March 2009, DSR 2009:V, 2097
China - Publications and
Audiovisual Products
Panel Report, China - Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products, WT/DS363/R and Corr.1, adopted19 January 2010, as modified by Appellate Body Report
WT/DS363/AB/R, DSR 2010:II, 261
China - Raw Materials Appellate Body Reports, China - Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials, WT/DS394/AB/R / WT/DS395/AB/R /WT/DS398/AB/R, adopted 22 February 2012
EC - Asbestos Appellate Body Report, European Communities - Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, WT/DS135/AB/R, adopted 5 April 2001, DSR 2001:VII, 3243 EC - Bananas III Appellate Body Report, European Communities - Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, WT/DS27/AB/R, adopted 25 September 1997, DSR 1997:II, 591 EC - Bananas III Panel Reports, European Communities - Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, (Ecuador) WT/DS27/R/ECU, (Guatemala and Honduras) WT/DS27/R/GTM, WT/DS27/R/HND, (Mexico) WT/DS27/R/MEX, (United States) WT/DS27/R/USA, adopted25 September 1997, as modified by Appellate Body Report
WT/DS27/AB/R, DSR 1997:II, p. 695 to DSR:1997:III, p. 1085EC - Export Subsidies on
Sugar Appellate Body Report, European Communities - Export Subsidies on Sugar, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, WT/DS283/AB/R, adopted19 May 2005, DSR 2005:XIII, p. 6365
EC - Hormones Appellate Body Report, EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, adopted13 February 1998, DSR 1998:I, p. 135
EC - Sardines Appellate Body Report, European Communities - Trade Description of Sardines, WT/DS231/AB/R, adopted 23 October 2002,DSR 2002:VIII, 3359
EC - Selected Customs
Matters
Panel Report, European Communities - Selected Customs Matters, WT/DS315/R, adopted 11 December 2006, as modified by AppellateBody Report WT/DS315/AB/R, DSR 2006:IX-X, p. 3915
EC and certain member
States - Large Civil
Aircraft Appellate Body Report, European Communities and Certain Member States - Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft,WT/DS316/AB/R, adopted 1 June 2011
India - Autos Panel Report, India - Measures Affecting the Automotive Sector, WT/DS146/R, WT/DS175/R and Corr.1, adopted 5 April 2002,DSR 2002:V, p. 1827
Indonesia - Autos Panel Report, Indonesia - Certain Measures Affecting the Automobile Industry, WT/DS54/R, WT/DS55/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R and Corr.1 and 2, adopted 23 July 1998, and Corr. 3 and 4,DSR 1998:VI, 2201
Japan - Alcoholic
Beverages II
Appellate Body Report, Japan - Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS8/AB/R, WT/DS10/AB/R, WT/DS11/AB/R, adopted 1 November1996, DSR 1996:I, p. 97
Japan - DRAMs (Korea) Appellate Body Report, Japan - Countervailing Duties on Dynamic Random Access Memories from Korea, WT/DS336/AB/R and Corr.1, adopted 17 December 2007, DSR 2007:VII, p. 2703WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 7 -Short Title Full Case Title and Citation
Korea - Alcoholic
Beverages
Appellate Body Report, Korea - Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS75/AB/R, WT/DS84/AB/R, adopted 17 February 1999,DSR 1999:I, 3
Korea - Various Measures
on Beef Appellate Body Report, Korea - Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef, WT/DS161/AB/R, WT/DS169/AB/R, adopted10 January 2001, DSR 2001:I, 5
Philippines - Distilled
Spirits
Appellate Body Reports, Philippines - Taxes on Distilled Spirits, WT/DS396/AB/R / WT/DS403/AB/R, adopted 20 January 2012 Turkey - Rice Panel Report, Turkey - Measures Affecting the Importation of Rice, WT/DS334/R, adopted 22 October 2007, DSR 2007:VI, 2151US - Anti-Dumping and
Countervailing Duties
(China) Appellate Body Report, United States - Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China,WT/DS379/AB/R, adopted 25 March 2011
US - Carbon Steel Appellate Body Report, United States - Countervailing Duties on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Germany, WT/DS213/AB/R and Corr.1, adopted 19 December 2002,DSR 2002:IX, 3779
US - Certain EC Products Appellate Body Report, United States - Import Measures on Certain Products from the European Communities, WT/DS165/AB/R, adopted10 January 2001, DSR 2001:I, p. 373
US - COOL Appellate Body Reports, United States - Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements, WT/DS384/AB/R / WT/DS386/AB/R, adopted 23 July 2012 US - Gasoline Appellate Body Report, United States - Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R, adopted 20 May 1996,DSR 1996:I, p. 3
US - Large Civil Aircraft
(2 nd complaint) Appellate Body Report, United States - Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint), WT/DS353/AB/R, adopted23 March 2012
US - Section 211
Appropriations Act
Appellate Body Report, United States - Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/AB/R, adopted 1 February2002, DSR 2002:II, p. 589
US - Softwood Lumber IV Appellate Body Report, United States - Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber fromCanada, WT/DS257/AB/R, adopted 17 February 2004,
DSR 2004:II, 571
US - Softwood Lumber IV Panel Report, United States - Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS257/R and Corr.1, adopted 17 February 2004, as modified by Appellate BodyReport WT/DS257/AB/R, DSR 2004:II, p. 641
US - Tuna II (Mexico) Appellate Body Report, United States - Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products,WT/DS381/AB/R, adopted 13 June 2012
US - Upland Cotton Appellate Body Report, United States - Subsidies on Upland Cotton, WT/DS267/AB/R, adopted 21 March 2005, DSR 2005:I, p. 3 US - Upland Cotton Panel Report, United States - Subsidies on Upland Cotton, WT/DS267/R, Corr.1, and Add.1 to Add.3, adopted 21 March 2005, as modified by Appellate Body Report WT/DS267/AB/R, DSR 2005:II, p. 299WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 8 -Short Title Full Case Title and Citation
US - Upland Cotton
(Article 21.5 - Brazil) Appellate Body Report, United States - Subsidies on Upland Cotton - Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Brazil, WT/DS267/AB/RW, adopted 20 June 2008, DSR 2008:III, 809 US - Wheat Gluten Appellate Body Report, United States - Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Wheat Gluten from the European Communities, WT/DS166/AB/R, adopted 19 January 2001, DSR 2001:II, 717US - Wool Shirts and
Blouses
Appellate Body Report, United States - Measure Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India, WT/DS33/AB/R, adopted23 May 1997, and Corr.1, DSR 1997:I, p. 323
WT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 9 -ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THESE REPORTS
Abbreviation Description
CES Clean Energy Supply
CHP Combined Heat and Power
complainants Japan and the European UnionDSB Dispute Settlement Body
DSU Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement ofDisputes
Electricity Act of 1998 Electricity Act, 1998, Service Ontario 1998, Chapter 15, Schedule A, as amended (Panel Exhibit JPN-5)Electricity Restructuring
Act of 2004 An Act to amend the Electricity Act, 1998 and the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998 and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, Service Ontario 2004, Chapter 23 (Panel Exhibits CDA-18 andJPN-8)
EU Panel Report Panel Report, Canada - Measures Relating to the Feed-in TariffProgram (WT/DS426/R)
FIT feed-in tariff
FIT Programme Ontario Power Authority Feed-in Tariff ProgramFIT Programme
Interpretations FIT Program Interpretations of the Domestic Content Requirements (Panel Exhibit EU-7) FIT Standard Definitions Ontario Power Authority, Feed-in Tariff Appendix 1 - Standard Definitions (version 1.5.1), 15 July 2011 (Panel Exhibit JPN-135)GA Global Adjustment
GATT 1994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994GPA Agreement on Government Procurement
Green Energy and Green
Economy Act of 2009
An Act to enact the Green Energy Act, 2009 and to build a green economy, to repeal the Energy Conservation Leadership Act, 2006 and the Energy Efficiency Act and to amend other statutes, ServiceOntario 2009, Chapter 12 (Panel Exhibit JPN-101)
HCI Hydroelectric Contract Initiative
HEPCO Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario
HOEP Hourly Ontario Energy Price
Hogan Report Professor William W. Hogan, Harvard University, "Overview of the Electricity System in the Province of Ontario", 21 December 2011 (Panel Exhibit CDA-2)IESO Independent Electricity System Operator
IESO Market Manual Independent Electricity System Operator, Market Manual IESO Market Rules Independent Electricity System Operator, Market Rules for the OntarioMarket
IPP Independent Power Producer
Japan Panel Report Panel Report, Canada - Certain Measures Affecting the RenewableEnergy Generation Sector (WT/DS412/R)
kW kilowatts kWh kilowatt hourWT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 10 -Abbreviation Description
LDC Local Distribution Company
MCP market clearing price
Memorandum of
Agreement
Memorandum of Agreement between Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Energy and Hydro One Inc., 27 March 2008 (Panel Exhibit CDA-107)Minister's 2009 FIT
Direction Direction dated 24 September 2009 from the Deputy Premier and Minister of Energy and Infrastructure to the Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Power Authority to develop a feed-in tariff (FIT) programme (Panel Exhibit JPN-102)MW megawatts
NUG Non-Utility Generator
OEB Ontario Energy Board
OEFC Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation
OPA Ontario Power Authority
OPA Proposed FIT Price
Schedule Presentation OPA, Presentation on "Proposed Feed-in Tariff Price Schedule Stakeholder Engagement - Session 4", 7 April 2009 (Panel ExhibitCDA-46)
OPG Ontario Power Generation
Panel Reports Panel Report, Canada - Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation Sector (WT/DS412/R) and Panel Report, Canada - Measures Relating to the Feed-in Tariff Program (WT/DS426/R) PJM Interconnection Mid-Atlantic region of the United StatesPV photovoltaic
RES Renewable Energy Supply
RESOP Renewable Energy Standard Offer Program
RPP Regulated Price Plan
SCM Agreement Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing MeasuresSSS Standard Supply Service
TRIM trade-related investment measure
TRIMs Agreement Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures TRIPS Agreement Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Working Procedures Working Procedures for Appellate Review, WT/AB/WP/6, 16 August 2010WTO World Trade Organization
WTO Agreement Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationWT/DS412/AB/R • WT/DS426/AB/R
- 11 -PANEL EXHIBITS CITED IN THESE REPORTS
Exhibit Description
CDA-2 Professor William W. Hogan, Harvard University, "Overview of the Electricity System in the Province of Ontario", 21 December 2011 CDA-6 Government of Ontario, Ontario's Long-Term Energy Plan (Queen's Printer forOntario, 2010)
CDA-16 Ontario Energy Board webpage, "Electricity Prices: ... OEB's Role in Electricity Prices", available at:Stakeholder Engagement - Session 4", 7 April 2009
CDA-52 Ontario Ministry of Energy, Request for Proposals for 300 MW of Renewable EnergySupply (RES I), issued 24 June 2004
CDA-53 Ontario Ministry of Energy, Request for Proposals for 1,000 MW of RenewableEnergy Supply (RES II), issued 17 June 2005
CDA-54 Ontario Ministry of Energy, Request for Proposals for approximately 500 MW of Renewable Energy Supply (RES III), issued 22 August 2008 CDA-55 Ontario Power Authority, Joint Report to the Minister of Energy: Recommendations on a Standard Offer Program for Small Generators connected to a DistributionSystem, 17 March 2006
CDA-59 Electricity Conservation & Supply Task Force, Tough Choices: Addressing Ontario's Power Needs, Final Report to the Minister of Energy (January 2004) CDA-64 Ontario Energy Board, EB-2009-0084, Report of the Board on the Cost of Capital for Ontario's Regulated Utilities, 11 December 2009 CDA-85 S. Arrowsmith, "Government Procurement in the WTO", Studies in Transnational Economic Law, Vol. 16 (Kluwer Law International, 2002), p. 53 CDA-106 Independent Electricity System Operator, Market Rules for the Ontario Market,Chapter 11 of the 7 March 2012 issue
CDA-107 Memorandum of Agreement between Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Energy and Hydro One Inc.,27 March 2008
CDA-128 S. Arrowsmith, "Government Procurement in the WTO", Studies in Transnationalquotesdbs_dbs11.pdfusesText_17[PDF] gaumont commerce nantes
[PDF] gcse 2017 digischool
[PDF] gcse commerce revision notes
[PDF] gcse english exam papers
[PDF] gcse maths revision pdf
[PDF] gcse mock exams
[PDF] gdid 2018 musique
[PDF] geant casino villefranche sur saone
[PDF] gecif
[PDF] geena davis grey's anatomy 2014
[PDF] geeps éducation physique
[PDF] geiselman woodward and beatty 1982 pdf
[PDF] gem trails of washington pdf files download
[PDF] gendarmerie royale maroc 1980