[PDF] Faut-il en finir avec les modèles dévaluation de la formation ? L

View - Download Faut-il en finir avec les modèles dévaluation de la formation ? L

Previous PDF

Next PDF

Tous droits r€serv€s Editions EMS ' In Quarto SARL, 2021 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. Universit€ Laval, and the Universit€ du Qu€bec " Montr€al. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/Document generated on 09/26/2023 3:36 p.m.Revue internationale P.M.E.

PME du BTP

Should we forget training evaluation models? The economic impact of external training in the construction SMEs capitaci...n? El impacto econ...mico de la capitaci...n externo en las PyME de la construcci...n

David Abonneau

Volume 34, Number 1, 2021URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1076459arDOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1076459arSee table of contentsPublisher(s)Editions EMS ' In Quarto SARLISSN0776-5436 (print)1918-9699 (digital)Explore this journalCite this article

Abonneau, D. (2021). Faut-il en finir avec les mod...les d†€valuation de la formation ? L†impact €conomique de la formation externalis€e dans les PME du BTP.

Revue internationale P.M.E.

34
(1), 34'50. https://doi.org/10.7202/1076459ar

Article abstract

The way in which SMEs assess the effectiveness of outsourced training has been the subject of little empirical work. However, as highlighted in the European CVTS (Continual Vocational Traning Survey) surveys, SME managers pay close attention to the effects of training and declare that they are engaged in measures to assess its impact. The literature has mainly focused on the tools deployed in large companies, often based on Kirkpatrick†s approach, but the practices of SMEs in this area remain largely unknown. The purpose of our article is to shed light on the methods of evaluating outsourced training in SMEs. To this end, a qualitative study was conducted with managers of SMEs in Building and Public Works industry. Our results indicate that the evaluation practices of SMEs are not homogeneous. They vary according to the objectives assigned to training on the one hand and the internal characteristics of companies on the other. At the end of the analysis, three evaluation methods were thus identified and characterized: remediation, adaptation and projection. Our conclusions invite us to rethink the way to support SMEs in their training projects based on an evaluation model called COLDEI. 34

HQTOCVKQP

/quotesdbs_dbs29.pdfusesText_35

[PDF] Marketing stratégique et opérationnel - Cartel Business Club

[PDF] Modèle OSI et TCP/IP

[PDF] d 'IPP - HAS

[PDF] Arts plastiques - Snes

[PDF] Différences d 'activité entre les inhibiteurs de la pompe ? protons

[PDF] Codes, textes législatifs et réglementaires - Légifrance

[PDF] Dialogue entre la philosophie et la politique, Aristote et - Hal-SHS

[PDF] Définitions : phonologie et phonétique - académie de Caen

[PDF] (Microsoft PowerPoint - Plan de surveillance et de contr\364le-2ppt)

[PDF] POLITIQUE CONJONCTURELLE

[PDF] c 'est un problème ou une problématique? - Cégep de Saint-Jérôme

[PDF] fonctions et procédures - Luc Brun - Greyc

[PDF] Guide de choix Profilés - Placo

[PDF] Réalisme et Naturalisme - L 'Etudiant

[PDF] B - Les formes de la séparation des pouvoirs - SES Massena