Foreign Direct Investment
It was prepared by Álvaro Calderón Olaf de Groot
Rice (Oryza sativa. L) genetic diversity for early vigor and drought
Diversité génétique de la vigueur initiale et de la tolérance au stress environmental variables related to drought conditions (leaf temperature ...
The Philippines Health System Review
At the local level local government units (LGUs) exercise health outcomes across socioeconomic variables; (iii) policy
Volume 13 Number 4 Oct.-December 2019
Complexes of ligand with the transition metal ions (Co+2 Ni+2
Volume 13 Number 4 Oct.-December 2019
Complexes of ligand with the transition metal ions (Co+2 Ni+2
Industrie des pêches et de laquaculture au Bénin
sur 142 pays au cours de 2012-2013 en recul de 15 positions par rapport au Bénin
1 Titlepage
exercise indirect control or influence through a chain of direct investment with care as it mixes a flow variable (trade) with a stock variable (FDI).
POLICE USE OF FORCE: POLICING PRACTICES
15-Nov-2018 These practices may include increased training on de-escalation tactics and ... significant and variable state and local rules.15 Private ...
Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Biological
Biocontrol Agent of Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink Once the released genetically variable natural enemies have established for a ...
ALGORITHMIQUE
derniers englobent l'ensemble des exercices traités en séance de TP
![POLICE USE OF FORCE: POLICING PRACTICES POLICE USE OF FORCE: POLICING PRACTICES](https://pdfprof.com/Listes/16/37028-1611-15-Police-Force.pdf.pdf.jpg)
U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
NOVEMBER 2018
BRIEFING
REPORT
POLICE USE OF FORCE:
AN EXAMINATION OF MODERN
POLICING PRACTICES
U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Washington, DC 20425
Ofcial Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov
U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is directed to:Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are
being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice.Serve as a national clearinghouse for information
in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin.Submit reports, ndings, and recommendations
to the President and Congress.Issue public service announcements to discourage
discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws. 1MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION
Catherine E. Lhamon, Chair
Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chair
Debo P. Adegbile*
Gail Heriot
Peter N. Kirsanow
David Kladney
Karen K. Narasaki
Michael Yaki
Mauro Morales, Staff Director
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20425
(202) 376-8128 voiceTTY Relay: 711
www.usccr.gov 142 U.S.C. §1975a.
*Denotes Commissioner"s recusal from the report.Police Use of Force: An
Examination of Modern
Policing Practices
Briefing Before
The United States Commission on Civil Rights
Held in Washington, DC
Briefing Report
[This page intentionally left blank]Letter of Transmittal
November 15, 2018
President Donald J. Trump
Vice President Mike Pence
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan
On behalf of the United States Commission on Civil Rights ("the Commission"), I am pleased to transmit our briefing report, Police Use of Force: An Examination of Modern Policing Practices. The report is also available in full on the Commission's website at www.usccr.gov. In this report, the Commission investigated rates of police use of force; whether rates andinstantiations of that use of force violate civil rights of persons of color, persons with disabilities,
LGBT communities, and low-income persons; promising or proven policies and practices worth replicating to minimize unnecessary use of force; and the perception and reality of discrimination in police use of force. The Commission considered evidence from law enforcement and court officials, community leaders and police reform advocates, scholars, legal experts, as well as testimony taken in by the Commission"s State Advisory Committees in Minnesota, New York,Maine, and Delaware.
The Commission majority approved key findings including the following: While police officers have the difficult and admirable job of providing crucial services to the communities they protect and serve, their job sometimes puts them in harm"s way and may require the use of force. Accordingly, police officers must operate with the highest standards of professionalism and accountability. Every community resident should be able to live, work, and travel confident in anexpectation that interactions with police officers will be fair, consistent with constitutional norms,
and guided by public safety free from bias or discrimination. Unfortunately, too many communities are not confident in these expectations, and so these communities have called for reforms to foster better community-police relations and prevent unjustified and excessive police uses of force. Accurate and comprehensive data regarding police uses of force is generally not available to police departments or the American public. No comprehensive national database exists that captures police uses of force. The best available evidence reflects high rates of uses of force nationally, with increased likelihood of police use of force against people of color, people with disabilities, LGBT people, people with mental health concerns, people with low incomes, and those at the intersection of these communities. Lack of sufficient trainingand funding for trainingleavesUNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
1331 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 1150 Washington, DC 20425 www.usccr.gov
officers and the public at risk. Repeated and highly publicized incidents of police use of force against persons of color and people with disabilities, combined with a lack of accurate data, lack of transparency about policies and practices in place governing use of force, and lack of accountability for noncompliance foster a perception that police use of force in communities of color and the disability community is unchecked, unlawful, and unsafe. The Commission majority voted for key recommendations, including that the United States Department of Justice should return to vigorous enforcement of constitutional policing, including under its authority pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 14141, and the use of consent decrees where necessary to ensure that constitutional policing standards are upheld. The Department of Justice should robustly support local efforts to develop and institute constitutional policing practices, including through the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) and maintaining the Community Relations Service (CRS) to focus on building community trust and reducing excessive or unauthorized uses of force, in coordination with police departments. The Commission majority also called on Congress to fund grants, facilitated by the Department of Justice, to incentive evidence-based practices that, when employed, reduce incidents of excessive or unauthorized force. These practices may include increased training on de-escalation tactics andalternatives to use of force. Congress should also fund grants that support effective external police
oversight and research regarding best practices for such oversight. The Commission majority called for practical reforms to stem the tide of perceived conflict between police officers and their communities, and to recommit this nation to the principles of fairness and equal treatment, including at the hands of police, that are core to democracy. These recommendations for forward progress are measured, appropriate, and urgent; our nation's communities need their implementation. We at the Commission are pleased to share our views, informed by careful research andinvestigation as well as civil rights expertise, to help ensure that all Americans enjoy civil rights
protections to which we are entitled.For the Commission,
Catherine E. Lhamon
ChairTable of Contents
iTABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1
Highlighted Findings: ................................................................................................................. 3
Highlighted Recommendations: .................................................................................................. 4
Chapter 1: Introduction: Definitions, Data, and Major Theoretical Perspectives .......................... 7
Defining Excessive Use of Force ................................................................................................ 9
State of National Data Collection ............................................................................................. 12
Existing Data on Lethal and Non-Lethal Use of Force ......................................................... 21
Disparities in Use of Force ................................................................................................... 22
Explanations for and Analysis of Rates of Police Use of Force ............................................... 25
Inevitability Argument .......................................................................................................... 26
Systemic Perspectives ........................................................................................................... 41
Chapter 2: Police Oversight And Accountability ........................................................................ 55
Internal Accountability ............................................................................................................. 55
Body-Worn Cameras ............................................................................................................ 63
External Oversight .................................................................................................................... 73
Civilian Review Boards ........................................................................................................ 74
Grand Juries .......................................................................................................................... 78
Qualified Immunity ............................................................................................................... 82
Consent Decrees.................................................................................................................... 86
Chapter 3: Changing Law Enforcement Behavior ....................................................................... 97
A Holistic Approach to Reforming the Overall Policing System ............................................. 97
Racial Diversity ........................................................................................................................ 99
Training ................................................................................................................................... 101
Implicit Bias Training ......................................................................................................... 103
De-escalation Training ........................................................................................................ 113
Mental Health and Disability Training ............................................................................... 126
Building Community Trust ..................................................................................................... 131
Police Use of Force
iiChapter 4: Findings and Recommendations .............................................................................. 137
Findings................................................................................................................................... 137
Community Trust ................................................................................................................ 137
Data ..................................................................................................................................... 137
Training ............................................................................................................................... 138
Accountability ..................................................................................................................... 138
Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 139
Commissioners' Statements, Rebuttals, and Surrebuttals ........................................................... 143
Statement of Chair Catherine E. Lhamon ............................................................................... 143
Statement of Vice Chair Patricia Timmons-Goodson ............................................................ 147
Statement of David Kladney ................................................................................................... 153
Statement of Commissioner Karen K. Narasaki ..................................................................... 171
Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot ................................................................................. 181
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Peter Kirsanow ........................................................ 197
Rebuttal of Commissioner David Kladney ............................................................................. 218
Acknowledgements
iiiACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Office of Civil Rights Evaluation (OCRE) produced the final version of this report under the direction of Katherine Culliton-González, Esq, OCRE Director. Dr. Marik Xavier-Brier, Civil Rights Analyst, performed principal research and writing. Interns Madison Hubbard, Michigan State University, Krista Painter, University of Texas, Sabrina Escalera-Flexhaug, American University, Washington College of Law, and Aaron Hurd, Indiana University, Maurer School of Law also provided valuable research and legal assistance. Commissioners and Commissioner Special Assistants Sheryl Cozart, Jason Lagria, Carissa Mulder, Amy Royce, Rukku Singla, and Alison Somin conducted research, edited, and examined the report. The Commission's General Counsel Maureen Rudolph reviewed and approved the report for legal sufficiency. State Advisory Committees in Delaware, Maine, Minnesota, and New York collected and provided testimony, findings, and recommendations to the Commission on policing issues with their jurisdictions.Police Use of Force
iv [This page intentionally left blank]Executive Summary
1EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The relationship between law enforcement and many communities in the U.S. is fraught and challenging, particularly for those who experience violent crimes coupled with intensive police presence and surveillance. A number of recent developments suggest a renewed commitment to resolving this issue. For the first time in decades, the country has witnessed ubiquitous and sustained protests by young people, communities of color, and other impacted populations in cities all across the country. 1 Further, in hope of fostering better community-police relationships, many law enforcement and city officials around the country have started implementing reform strategies to allay communities' concerns about actual or perceived unfair and unequal policing. Reform advocates often acknowledge the positive steps that some jurisdictions are undertaking, but reported cases of excessive force remain a national concern. 2Furthermore, the Bill of Rights of
the U.S. Constitution guarantees the fundamental rights of both law enforcement and the communities they serve, whose rights are protected under the Fourth, Eighth, and FourteenthAmendments.
3 While allegations that some police force is excessive, unjustified, and discriminatory continue andproliferate, current data regarding police use of force is insufficient to determine if instances are
occurring more frequently. The public continues to hear competing narratives by law enforcement and community members, and the hard reality is that available national and local data is flawed and inadequate. A central contributing factor is the absence of mandatory federal reporting and standardized reporting guidelines. Former FBI Director James Comey stated that: Not long after riots broke out in Ferguson [in 2014], I asked my staff to tell me how many people shot by police were African-American in this country. I wanted to see trends. I wanted to see information. They couldn"t give it to me, and it wasn"t their fault. Demographic data regarding officer-involved shootings is not consistently reported to us . . . [b]ecause reporting is voluntary, our data is incomplete and therefore, in the aggregate, unreliable.quotesdbs_dbs29.pdfusesText_35[PDF] Vecteurs - Exercices corrigés Seconde (vecteurs colinéaires
[PDF] Exercices et Travaux Pratiques - usthb
[PDF] Exercices d 'arithmétiques corrigés Exercice N°1 : 1-Etablir que pour
[PDF] athlétisme formes d exercices - Olympic moves
[PDF] Échauffement et étirement
[PDF] Économie générale - Numilog
[PDF] Séance 2 - Exercices - Thèse - arguments - exemples
[PDF] Exercices d arithmétiques corrigés Exercice N°1 : 1-Etablir que pour
[PDF] athlétisme formes d exercices - Olympic moves
[PDF] Exercices d 'échauffement et d 'étirement - Travail sécuritaire NB
[PDF] Électrostatique et électrocinétique 1re et 2e années - 2ème édition
[PDF] Equilibres liquide-vapeur des binaires série 1 Exercice 1 Un
[PDF] Exemple de sujet d 'expression orale - CIEP
[PDF] Informatique tronc commun Exercices d 'algorithmique