[PDF] Discussion Articles Reclaiming the Definition of Sustainability





Previous PDF Next PDF



b1e486be-greenpeace-international-report-destruction

17 apr. 2021 ARDS. No deforestation or forest conversion to plantations allowed? 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. A 'Yes' means the scheme's standards include ...



Les fonds dinvestissement durables norientent guère les capitaux

21 jun. 2021 Larissa Marti Greenpeace Suisse; Martina Holbach



Cut from Congo

Greenpeace / John Novis Greenpeace first defined the global extent of forest ... chamber disagreed about the definition of “IFL cores”.



New Improved Ranking criteria explained - Greenpeace

A chemicals policy underpinned by the precautionary principle means that companies Top marks on these criteria go to companies whose definition of the ...



Greenpeace International Annual Report 2018

Creating a broad movement means the Greenpeace global organisation has looked beyond our traditional stakeholders such as our financial supporters



Une industrie mise au défi - Vers une aquaculture durable

Greenpeace Canada (Québec office) 4 Greenpeace International Une industrie mise au défi : Vers une ... L'agriculture durable par définition



Global Cosmetics and Personal Care companies Microbead

Greenpeace East Asia decided to survey the personal care sector as a whole Definition: How does the company define microbeads for their commitment?



The truth behind fossil fuel advertising

3 okt. 2021 The Cambridge Dictionary definition of a green- ... However Greenpeace as a network regards nuclear energy as a false solution ...



Discussion Articles Reclaiming the Definition of Sustainability

1 Greenpeace Research Laboratories Department of Biological Sciences



THROWING AWAY THE FUTURE:

standardized definition and is often used to refer to plastic that is either bio-based science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6448/76 See also



Timeout for fast fashion - Greenpeace

Jan 6 2018 · Since 2011 Greenpeace’s Detox campaign has been challenging this environmental toll and has gathered support from 78 companies including fashion brands large retailers and textiles suppliers to achieve greater transparency and zero discharges of hazardous chemicals in their supply chain manufacturing by 2020



LESS IS MORE - Greenpeace

Greenpeace is calling for a global reduction of 50 in production and consumption of animal products by 2050 as compared to the current situation16 Achieving this goal is possible under a vision of ecological farming In other words we propose a level of production that ensures food security while protecting the climate and biodiversity 16



Reclaiming the Definition of Sustainability - Greenpeace

1 Greenpeace Research Laboratories Department of Biological Sciences University of Exeter Exeter EX4 4PS UK 2 Visiting Research Fellow Faculty of Applied Sciences University of the West of England Coldharbour Lane Frenchay Campus Bristol BS16 1QY UK



Annual Report 06 - Greenpeace

Greenpeace is an independent organisation - we do not accept money from governments or corporations Our funds come from the millions of individuals who share our vision for a green and peaceful planet So it's important that we constantly strive to spend those donations as efficiently as we can

What is Greenpeace's vision of ecological farming?

    Accordingly, Greenpeace is calling for a global reduction of 50% in production and consumption of animal products by 2050 as compared to the current situation. Achieving this goal is possible under a vision of ecological farming, in other words, a level that ensures food security while protecting climate and biodiversity.

What is the Greenpeace goal?

    Please note that the latest data from FAOSTAT is year 2013 (as of January 2018), so that is the reference year for the Greenpeace goal. “Greenpeace is calling for a global reduction of 50% in production and consumption of animal products by 2050” Meat and dairy: effect on the climate

What is Greenpeace 21?

    20 LESS IS MORE The Greenpeace vision of the meat and dairy system towards 2050 GREENPEACE 21 Livestock production is also contributing to the loss of both the world’s most iconic large carnivores and herbivores, leading to widespread ecosystem imbalance.

What is the Food Revolution Greenpeace is calling for?

    The food revolution Greenpeace is calling for requires large-scale changes by governments, businesses and individuals. It will need integral changes in the food system from the farm to the home to phase out industrial meat and achieve the halving of production and consumption of meat and dairy by 2050, based on current levels.
Discussion Articles Reclaiming the Definition of Sustainability

Sustainability Discussion Articles60

© 2007 ecomed publishers (Verlagsgruppe Hüthig Jehle Rehm GmbH), D-86899 Landsberg and Tokyo Mumbai Seoul Melbourne ParisEnv Sci Pollut Res 1414

141414 (1) 60 - 66 (2007)

Discussion Articles

Reclaiming the Definition of Sustainability

Paul Johnston

1* , Mark Everard 2 , David Santillo 1* and Karl-Henrik Robèrt3 1 Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Department of Biological Sciences, Unive rsity of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK 2

Visiting Research Fellow, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Frenchay Campus,

Bristol BS16 1QY, UK

3

Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, 41296, Göteborg, Sweden

* Corresponding authors (

P.Johnston@exeter.ac.uk; D.Santillo@exeter.ac.uk)

IntroductionThe idea of 'sustainable development' was first widely ar-ticulated in 1987's Brundtland Report (World Commissionon Environment and Development) from the United Nations.The 'Brundtland definition' of sustainable development wasframed as "...development that meets the needs of the presentwithout compromising the ability of future generations tomeet their own needs". It posits that the only truly sustain-able form of progress is that which simultaneously addressesthe interlinked aspects of economy, environment and socialwell-being.In the subsequent two years, around 140 alternative andvariously-modified definitions of 'sustainable development'emerged. Currently, it has been estimated that some threehundred definitions of 'sustainability' and 'sustainable de-velopment' exist broadly within the domain of environmen-

tal management and the ass ociated disciplines which link with it, either directly or indirectly. A framework to guide human development requires the tight integration of several distinct, yet associated elements. The tight linkage of sustainability concepts to ongoing economic and technical activities, as opposed to traditionally defined 'economic growth', is essential in framing the constraints and new opportunities of subsequent social and commer- cial development. This does imply changes in direction rather than perpetuation of the old economic model with all of its vested interests, though this is as much an oppor- tunity as a threat, as new markets are created for which new technologies and products will be essential. However, the realisation of this ideal is sadly lacking. Unfortunately, the proliferation of alternative definitions of 'sustainability', which flowed throughout the 1990s, has created a situation where a concept which is central to environmental issues, and solutions to them, has come to mean many things to many constituencies. Simply, 'sustainable development' is now a term which is increasingly regarded either as internally self-contradictory (an oxymoron) or, at best, plagued by ambiguous or dis- torted definitions. As a result, there are many constituencies which perceive the term 'sustainable development' as a ve- hicle to perpetuate many and varied corporate and institu- tional interests whilst giving the impression of adherence to,

and observance of, environmentally-sound principles. ThisDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.01.375

Abstract

Background and Scope. Since its inception two decades ago, the concept of sustainable development has suffered from a prolif- eration of definitions, such that it has increasingly come to mean many things to many different people. This has limited its cred- ibility, called into question its practical application and the sig- nificance of associated achievements and, overall, limited the progress in environmental and social developments which it was designed to underpin. Goal. This viewpoint article is intended to re-open the concept of sustainable development for discussion 20 years on from the Brundtland Report, in the context of the current state of the world, our growing understanding of ecosystems and their re- sponse to stressors and the parallel increase in recognition of inherent limitations to that understanding. Approach. Following a brief review of the diverse manner in which the concept has developed over time, we present the case for application of a series of simple conditions for sustainability, originally developed by The Natural Step in the early 90s, which nevertheless still provide a sound basis on which progress to- wards sustainable development could be monitored. The paper also highlights the unavoidable links between sustainability and ethics, including those in the sensitive fields of population and quality of life. Discussion. Overall we argue the need for the concept of sus- tainable development to be reclaimed from the plethora of eco- nomically-focused or somewhat vague and un-measurable defi- nitions which have found increasing favour in recent years and which all too often accompany relatively minor progress against 'business as usual'.

Recommendations and Perspectives.

The vision encapsulated in

the Brundtland Report was ground-breaking. If, however, true sustainability in human interactions with the biosphere is to be realised, a far stronger and more empirical interpretation of the original intent is urgently required. To be effective, such an in- terpretation must encompass and guide developments in politi- cal instruments and public policy as well as corporate decision- making, and must focus increasingly on addressing the root causes of major threats to sustainability rather than just their consequences.Keywords: Ecosystems; ethical standards; over-exploitation; pollution; public policy; resources; sustainability; sustainable development; uncertaintyquotesdbs_dbs2.pdfusesText_2
[PDF] greenpeace english

[PDF] greenpeace fondateurs

[PDF] greenpeace france

[PDF] greenpeace international

[PDF] greenpeace logo

[PDF] greenpeace mondialisation

[PDF] greenpeace poisson liste verte

[PDF] greenwashing définition ademe

[PDF] greenwashing définition simple

[PDF] greenwashing exemple

[PDF] greenwashing marketing

[PDF] greenwashing rse

[PDF] greenwashing total

[PDF] greenwashing wikipedia

[PDF] greenwood acteur