damo_nlp at MEDIQA 2021: Knowledge-based Preprocessing and
11 ???. 2021 ?. formance according to the Rouge metric. Pre-trained generative language models are ... in Figure 1 (b): we first try to correct spell errors.
Guide. Bulletin 1722. INSTITUTION Louisiana State Dept. of
Post Office Box 44064 Baton Rouge
Correction : voir partie en rouge • Les parents sont attendus à 18h20
11 ????. 2020 ?. Correction : voir partie en rouge. Chers parents. Comme mentionné dans l'info parents de la rentrée
Correlation between ROUGE and Human Evaluation of Extractive
between the ROUGE scores and human evaluation based (SumACCY) based on a word network created by merg- ... corrections and incomplete sentences.
Enhancing Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization
factual consistency of our FASUM model. Further- more the correction has a rather small impact on the ROUGE score
A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systems
5 ???. 2020 ?. precision word choice over word order
Trucs et Astuces pour la correction de documents convertis de Word
Cliquer sur le cadre puis sur la fonction « centrer » du menu. 3. Agrandir les zones de texte trop petites : La flèche rouge signifie que le texte est plus
arXiv:2204.07705v2 [cs.CL] 29 Apr 2022
29 ???. 2022 ?. model (Ouyang et al. 2022) by 3.3 ROUGE-L ... Explanation: The example does not correct the misuse of the word way.
Department of Corrections
25 ???. 2017 ?. A copy of this report is available for public inspection at the Baton Rouge office of the. Louisiana Legislative Auditor.
Performance Study on Extractive Text Summarization Using BERT
28 ???. 2022 ?. Generating a summary does not have an absolute correct answer. ... trigram (ROUGE-3) or longest common sequence of words (ROUGE-L).
Vue d’ensemble
Vous êtes en train de taper un texte. Vous faites une erreur et le mot est marqué d’un trait rouge ondulé.
Comment rédiger une correction ?
Supprimez les erreurs, effacez des mots ou des pans de phrase entiers, et rédigez directement vos corrections dans le document. À gauche de la ligne sur laquelle une correction a été appliquée, un trait rouge devrait apparaître. Il permet au correcteur de visualiser l’emplacement des corrections appliquées.
Comment corriger un document Word ?
Pour commencer à corriger un document, il faut dans un premier temps activer le suivi des modifications. Pour ce faire, dans le document Word, rendez-vous sur l’onglet Révision, et cliquez sur Suivi des modifications. 2. Ajoutez des corrections Une fois le suivi des modifications activé, la correction peut débuter.
Comment changer la couleur d'un document dans Word ?
Toutefois, Word attribue une couleur à chaque auteur, qui est susceptible de changer lorsque vous ou une autre personne ouvrez à nouveau le document. Accédez à Révision > du lanceur de dialogue de suivi . Sélectionnez Options avancées. Sélectionnez les flèches à côté des cases Couleur et Commentaires, et choisissez Par auteur.
Comment puis-je voir les corrections effectuées ?
Cliquez sur ce trait rouge pour dévoiler le détail des corrections effectuées. Vous devriez alors pouvoir visualiser les éléments supprimés (ils sont barrés), et les éléments ajoutés (visibles en rouge). 3. Ajoutez un commentaire
![arXiv:2204.07705v2 [cs.CL] 29 Apr 2022 arXiv:2204.07705v2 [cs.CL] 29 Apr 2022](https://pdfprof.com/Listes/18/4935-182204.07705.pdf.jpg)
SUPER-NATURALINSTRUCTIONS:
Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks Yizhong Wang2}Swaroop Mishra3|Pegah Alipoormolabashi4|Yeganeh Kordi5Amirreza Mirzaei
4Anjana Arunkumar3Arjun Ashok6Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran3
Atharva Naik
7David Stap8Eshaan Pathak9Giannis Karamanolakis10Haizhi Gary Lai11
Ishan Purohit
12Ishani Mondal13Jacob Anderson3Kirby Kuznia3Krima Doshi3Maitreya Patel3
Kuntal Kumar Pal
3Mehrad Moradshahi14Mihir Parmar3Mirali Purohit15Neeraj Varshney3
Phani Rohitha Kaza
3Pulkit Verma3Ravsehaj Singh Puri3Rushang Karia3Shailaja Keyur Sampat3
Savan Doshi
3Siddhartha Mishra16Sujan Reddy17Sumanta Patro18Tanay Dixit19Xudong Shen20
Chitta Baral
3Yejin Choi1;2Noah A. Smith1;2Hannaneh Hajishirzi1;2Daniel Khashabi21
1Allen Institute for AI2Univ. of Washington3Arizona State Univ.4Sharif Univ. of Tech.5Tehran Polytechnic6PSG College of Tech.7IIT Kharagpur
8Univ. of Amsterdam9UC Berkeley10Columbia Univ.11Factored AI12Govt. Polytechnic Rajkot13Microsoft Research14Stanford Univ.15Zycus Infotech
16Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst17National Inst. of Tech. Karnataka18TCS Research19IIT Madras20National Univ. of Singapore21Johns Hopkins Univ.
Abstract
How well can NLP models generalize to ava-
rietyof unseen tasks when provided with task instructions? To address this question, we first introduce SUPER-NATURALINSTRUCTIONS,1 a benchmark of 1,616 diverse NLP tasks and their expert-written instructions. Our collec- tioncovers76distincttasktypes, includingbut not limited to classification, extraction, infill- ing, sequence tagging, text rewriting, and text composition. This large and diverse collec- tion of tasks enables rigorous benchmarking of cross-task generalization under instructions- training models to follow instructions on a sub- set of tasks and evaluating them on the remain- ing unseen ones.Furthermore, we build Tk-INSTRUCT, a trans-
former model trained to follow a variety of in- context instructions (plain language task defi- nitions ork-shot examples). Our experiments show that Tk-INSTRUCToutperforms existing instruction-following models such as Instruct-GPT by over 9% on our benchmark despite be-
ing an order of magnitude smaller. We further analyze generalization as a function of various scaling parameters, such as the number of ob- served tasks, the number of instances per task, and model sizes. We hope our dataset and model facilitate future progress towards more general-purpose NLP models. 21 IntroductionThe NLP community has witnessed great progress
in building models for generalization tounseen tasks via in-context instructions (Mishra et al.
,1SUPER-NATURALINSTRUCTIONSrepresents a super-
sized expansion ofNATURALINSTRUCTIONS(Mishra et al., 2022b) which had 61 tasks. 2 The dataset, models, and a leaderboard can be found at https://instructions.apps.allenai.org. }Co-first authors|Co-second authors
-Input:ÒContext:ÉÔThat's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with.' Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.'"-Output: ÒYesÓ-Explanation: ÒThe participant engages in small talk when wishing their opponent to have a wonderful tripHÓ-Input: ÒContext: É'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?!' Utterance:'My item is food too'.Ó-Output: ÒYesÓ-Explanation: ÒThe utterance onlytakesthe negotiation forward and there is no side talkH Hence the correct answer is ÔNoÕHÓ DefinitionÒHHHGivenanutteranceandrecentdialoguecontextcontainingpastlutterancestwhereveravailabler outputÔYesÕiftheutterancecontainsthesmall>talkstrategy otherwiseoutputÔNoÕHSmall>talkisacooperativenegotiationstrategyHItisusedfordiscussingtopicsapartfromthenegotiation tobuildarapportwiththeopponentHÓTaskInstruction-Input: ÒContext: É'I am excited to spend time with everyone from camp!'Utterance:'That's awesome!I really love being out here with my son.Do you think you could spare some food?'Ó-ExpectedOutput:ÒYesÓPositiveExamplesNegativeExamplesEvaluationInstancesTk-InstructFigure 1: An example task from SUP-NATINST
adopted fromCha wlaet al.
2021). A successful model is expected to use the provided instructions (including task definition and demonstration examples) to output responses to a pool of evaluation instances. 2022b
Sanh et al.
2022W eiet al.
2022) using large pretrained language models (
Raffel et al.
2020Bro wnet al.
2020). As remarkable as mod- els like InstructGPT (
Ouyang et al.
2022) are, the contribution of various design choices to their suc- cess is opaque. In particular, the role of super- vised data has remained understudied due to lim- ited data released by the corporate entities behind major models. In addition, it is nearly impossible for the research community to extend and re-train these gigantic models. Addressing these two chal-arXiv:2204.07705v3 [cs.CL] 24 Oct 2022
Resource→SUP-NATINST
(this work)NATINSTMishra et al.
2022b)CROSSFIT
Ye et al.
2021)PROMPTSOURCE
Bach et al.
2022)FLAN
Wei et al.
2022)INSTRUCTGPT
Ouyang et al.
2022)Has task instructions?33 7 3 3 3
Has negative examples?33 7 7 7 7
Has non-English tasks?37 7 7 3 3
Is public?33 3 3 3 7 Number of tasks 1616 61 269 176 62 -Number of instructions 1616 61 - 2052 620 14378
Number of annotated tasks types 76 6 13 13
12 10Avg. task definition length (words) 56.6 134.4 - 24.8 8.2 -Table 1: A comparison of SUP-NATINSTto a few notable datasets in the field. We obtain the number of tasks,
instructions, and task types of other datasets from their original paper. "-" indicates the fields are not applicable or
unknown. Standards for categorizing task types vary across different datasets (see Fig. 2 ). *PROMPTSOURCEdoesnot provide task type annotation for all their tasks, for which we report only the 13 task types annotated for training
T0 (Sanh et al.
2022) instead.Translation
Question
Answering
Program
Execution
Question
Generation
Sentiment
Analysis
TextCategorization
TextMatching
ToxicLanguage
Detection
Misc. Cause EectClassication
Information
Extraction
Textual
Entailment
Commonsense
Classication
NamedEntity
Recognition
Fill in The Blank TextCompletion
Sentence
Composition
TitleGeneration
WrongCandidate
Generation
Question
Understanding
Language
Identication
Sentence
Perturbation
Answerability
Classication
Coreference
Resolution
Summarization
TextQuality
Evaluation
Paraphrasing
Text to CodeDialogue
Generation
Question
Rewriting
PosTagging
WordSemantics
StoryComposition
Linguistic
Probing
Speaker
Identication
Data to Text WordAnalogy
Gender
Classication
Dialogue
ActRecognition
Stereotype
Detection
Negotiation
Strategy
Detection
Coherence
Classication
Ethics
Classication
Explanation
Keyword
Tagging
Answer
Verication
Mathematics
WordRelation
Classication
Sentence
Ordering
Intent
Identication
Code to Text TextSimplication
Dialogue
StateTracking
Grammar
ErrorDetection
Section
Classication
FactVerication
Stance
Detection
Overlap
Extraction
Grammar
ErrorCorrection
Question
Decomposition
Number
Conversion
IronyDetection
Speaker
Relation
Classication
StyleTransfer
Spelling
ErrorDetection
SpamClassication
Sentence
Compression
Punctuation
ErrorDetection
PoemGeneration
PaperReview
Entity
Generation
Entity
Relation
Classication
Discourse
Connective
Identication
Discourse
Relation
Classication
Preposition
Prediction
Sentence
Expansion(a) SUP-NATINST(this work)
Answer
Generation
Question
Generation
Classification
Minimal
TextModification
Incorrect
Answer
Generation
Verification(b) NATINST
QAMultiple
Choice
QAExtractive
Bias andFairness
QAClosed
BookSentiment
Summarization
NLIParaphrase
TopicClassification
Coreference
StoryCompletion
quotesdbs_dbs31.pdfusesText_37[PDF] modification document word
[PDF] feuillet d'hypnos 178 analyse
[PDF] feuillets d'hypnos horrible journée
[PDF] feuillets dhypnos en ligne
[PDF] feuillets d'hypnos fragment 141
[PDF] feuillets dhypnos extraits
[PDF] fureur et mystère de rené char pdf
[PDF] feuillets dhypnos pdf
[PDF] grille dévaluation des acquis de la formation
[PDF] rené char feuillets dhypnos
[PDF] comment évaluer les acquis d'une formation
[PDF] l'évaluation en formation d'adultes
[PDF] evaluer les acquis des apprenants
[PDF] évaluation des acquis formation professionnelle