[PDF] arXiv:2204.07705v2 [cs.CL] 29 Apr 2022





Previous PDF Next PDF



damo_nlp at MEDIQA 2021: Knowledge-based Preprocessing and

11 ???. 2021 ?. formance according to the Rouge metric. Pre-trained generative language models are ... in Figure 1 (b): we first try to correct spell errors.





Correction : voir partie en rouge • Les parents sont attendus à 18h20

11 ????. 2020 ?. Correction : voir partie en rouge. Chers parents. Comme mentionné dans l'info parents de la rentrée



Correlation between ROUGE and Human Evaluation of Extractive

between the ROUGE scores and human evaluation based (SumACCY) based on a word network created by merg- ... corrections and incomplete sentences.



Enhancing Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization

factual consistency of our FASUM model. Further- more the correction has a rather small impact on the ROUGE score



A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systems

5 ???. 2020 ?. precision word choice over word order



Trucs et Astuces pour la correction de documents convertis de Word

Cliquer sur le cadre puis sur la fonction « centrer » du menu. 3. Agrandir les zones de texte trop petites : La flèche rouge signifie que le texte est plus 



arXiv:2204.07705v2 [cs.CL] 29 Apr 2022

29 ???. 2022 ?. model (Ouyang et al. 2022) by 3.3 ROUGE-L ... Explanation: The example does not correct the misuse of the word way.



Department of Corrections

25 ???. 2017 ?. A copy of this report is available for public inspection at the Baton Rouge office of the. Louisiana Legislative Auditor.



Performance Study on Extractive Text Summarization Using BERT

28 ???. 2022 ?. Generating a summary does not have an absolute correct answer. ... trigram (ROUGE-3) or longest common sequence of words (ROUGE-L).

  • Vue d’ensemble

    Vous êtes en train de taper un texte. Vous faites une erreur et le mot est marqué d’un trait rouge ondulé.

Comment rédiger une correction ?

Supprimez les erreurs, effacez des mots ou des pans de phrase entiers, et rédigez directement vos corrections dans le document. À gauche de la ligne sur laquelle une correction a été appliquée, un trait rouge devrait apparaître. Il permet au correcteur de visualiser l’emplacement des corrections appliquées.

Comment corriger un document Word ?

Pour commencer à corriger un document, il faut dans un premier temps activer le suivi des modifications. Pour ce faire, dans le document Word, rendez-vous sur l’onglet Révision, et cliquez sur Suivi des modifications. 2. Ajoutez des corrections Une fois le suivi des modifications activé, la correction peut débuter.

Comment changer la couleur d'un document dans Word ?

Toutefois, Word attribue une couleur à chaque auteur, qui est susceptible de changer lorsque vous ou une autre personne ouvrez à nouveau le document. Accédez à Révision > du lanceur de dialogue de suivi . Sélectionnez Options avancées. Sélectionnez les flèches à côté des cases Couleur et Commentaires, et choisissez Par auteur.

Comment puis-je voir les corrections effectuées ?

Cliquez sur ce trait rouge pour dévoiler le détail des corrections effectuées. Vous devriez alors pouvoir visualiser les éléments supprimés (ils sont barrés), et les éléments ajoutés (visibles en rouge). 3. Ajoutez un commentaire

arXiv:2204.07705v2 [cs.CL] 29 Apr 2022

SUPER-NATURALINSTRUCTIONS:

Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks Yizhong Wang2}Swaroop Mishra3|Pegah Alipoormolabashi4|Yeganeh Kordi5

Amirreza Mirzaei

4Anjana Arunkumar3Arjun Ashok6Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran3

Atharva Naik

7David Stap8Eshaan Pathak9Giannis Karamanolakis10Haizhi Gary Lai11

Ishan Purohit

12Ishani Mondal13Jacob Anderson3Kirby Kuznia3Krima Doshi3Maitreya Patel3

Kuntal Kumar Pal

3Mehrad Moradshahi14Mihir Parmar3Mirali Purohit15Neeraj Varshney3

Phani Rohitha Kaza

3Pulkit Verma3Ravsehaj Singh Puri3Rushang Karia3Shailaja Keyur Sampat3

Savan Doshi

3Siddhartha Mishra16Sujan Reddy17Sumanta Patro18Tanay Dixit19Xudong Shen20

Chitta Baral

3Yejin Choi1;2Noah A. Smith1;2Hannaneh Hajishirzi1;2Daniel Khashabi21

1

Allen Institute for AI2Univ. of Washington3Arizona State Univ.4Sharif Univ. of Tech.5Tehran Polytechnic6PSG College of Tech.7IIT Kharagpur

8Univ. of Amsterdam9UC Berkeley10Columbia Univ.11Factored AI12Govt. Polytechnic Rajkot13Microsoft Research14Stanford Univ.15Zycus Infotech

16Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst17National Inst. of Tech. Karnataka18TCS Research19IIT Madras20National Univ. of Singapore21Johns Hopkins Univ.

Abstract

How well can NLP models generalize to ava-

rietyof unseen tasks when provided with task instructions? To address this question, we first introduce SUPER-NATURALINSTRUCTIONS,1 a benchmark of 1,616 diverse NLP tasks and their expert-written instructions. Our collec- tioncovers76distincttasktypes, includingbut not limited to classification, extraction, infill- ing, sequence tagging, text rewriting, and text composition. This large and diverse collec- tion of tasks enables rigorous benchmarking of cross-task generalization under instructions- training models to follow instructions on a sub- set of tasks and evaluating them on the remain- ing unseen ones.

Furthermore, we build Tk-INSTRUCT, a trans-

former model trained to follow a variety of in- context instructions (plain language task defi- nitions ork-shot examples). Our experiments show that Tk-INSTRUCToutperforms existing instruction-following models such as Instruct-

GPT by over 9% on our benchmark despite be-

ing an order of magnitude smaller. We further analyze generalization as a function of various scaling parameters, such as the number of ob- served tasks, the number of instances per task, and model sizes. We hope our dataset and model facilitate future progress towards more general-purpose NLP models. 2

1 IntroductionThe NLP community has witnessed great progress

in building models for generalization tounseen tasks via in-context instructions (

Mishra et al.

,1

SUPER-NATURALINSTRUCTIONSrepresents a super-

sized expansion ofNATURALINSTRUCTIONS(Mishra et al., 2022b
) which had 61 tasks. 2 The dataset, models, and a leaderboard can be found at https://instructions.apps.allenai.org. }Co-first authors|Co-second authors

-Input:ÒContext:ÉÔThat's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with.' Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.'"-Output: ÒYesÓ-Explanation: ÒThe participant engages in small talk when wishing their opponent to have a wonderful tripHÓ-Input: ÒContext: É'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?!' Utterance:'My item is food too'.Ó-Output: ÒYesÓ-Explanation: ÒThe utterance onlytakesthe negotiation forward and there is no side talkH Hence the correct answer is ÔNoÕHÓ DefinitionÒHHHGivenanutteranceandrecentdialoguecontextcontainingpastlutterancestwhereveravailabler outputÔYesÕiftheutterancecontainsthesmall>talkstrategy otherwiseoutputÔNoÕHSmall>talkisacooperativenegotiationstrategyHItisusedfordiscussingtopicsapartfromthenegotiation tobuildarapportwiththeopponentHÓTaskInstruction-Input: ÒContext: É'I am excited to spend time with everyone from camp!'Utterance:'That's awesome!I really love being out here with my son.Do you think you could spare some food?'Ó-ExpectedOutput:ÒYesÓPositiveExamplesNegativeExamplesEvaluationInstancesTk-InstructFigure 1: An example task from SUP-NATINST

adopted from

Cha wlaet al.

2021
). A successful model is expected to use the provided instructions (including task definition and demonstration examples) to output responses to a pool of evaluation instances. 2022b

Sanh et al.

2022

W eiet al.

2022
) using large pretrained language models (

Raffel et al.

2020

Bro wnet al.

2020
). As remarkable as mod- els like InstructGPT (

Ouyang et al.

2022
) are, the contribution of various design choices to their suc- cess is opaque. In particular, the role of super- vised data has remained understudied due to lim- ited data released by the corporate entities behind major models. In addition, it is nearly impossible for the research community to extend and re-train these gigantic models. Addressing these two chal-arXiv:2204.07705v3 [cs.CL] 24 Oct 2022

Resource→SUP-NATINST

(this work)NATINST

Mishra et al.

2022b
)CROSSFIT

Ye et al.

2021
)PROMPTSOURCE

Bach et al.

2022
)FLAN

Wei et al.

2022
)INSTRUCTGPT

Ouyang et al.

2022
)Has task instructions?33 7 3 3 3

Has negative examples?33 7 7 7 7

Has non-English tasks?37 7 7 3 3

Is public?33 3 3 3 7 Number of tasks 1616 61 269 176 62 -

Number of instructions 1616 61 - 2052 620 14378

Number of annotated tasks types 76 6 13 13

12 10

Avg. task definition length (words) 56.6 134.4 - 24.8 8.2 -Table 1: A comparison of SUP-NATINSTto a few notable datasets in the field. We obtain the number of tasks,

instructions, and task types of other datasets from their original paper. "-" indicates the fields are not applicable or

unknown. Standards for categorizing task types vary across different datasets (see Fig. 2 ). *PROMPTSOURCEdoes

not provide task type annotation for all their tasks, for which we report only the 13 task types annotated for training

T0 (

Sanh et al.

2022
) instead.Translation

Question

Answering

Program

Execution

Question

Generation

Sentiment

Analysis

Text

Categorization

Text

Matching

Toxic

Language

Detection

Misc. Cause Eect

Classication

Information

Extraction

Textual

Entailment

Commonsense

Classication

Named

Entity

Recognition

Fill in The Blank Text

Completion

Sentence

Composition

Title

Generation

Wrong

Candidate

Generation

Question

Understanding

Language

Identication

Sentence

Perturbation

Answerability

Classication

Coreference

Resolution

Summarization

Text

Quality

Evaluation

Paraphrasing

Text to Code

Dialogue

Generation

Question

Rewriting

Pos

Tagging

Word

Semantics

Story

Composition

Linguistic

Probing

Speaker

Identication

Data to Text Word

Analogy

Gender

Classication

Dialogue

Act

Recognition

Stereotype

Detection

Negotiation

Strategy

Detection

Coherence

Classication

Ethics

Classication

Explanation

Keyword

Tagging

Answer

Verication

Mathematics

Word

Relation

Classication

Sentence

Ordering

Intent

Identication

Code to Text Text

Simplication

Dialogue

State

Tracking

Grammar

Error

Detection

Section

Classication

Fact

Verication

Stance

Detection

Overlap

Extraction

Grammar

Error

Correction

Question

Decomposition

Number

Conversion

Irony

Detection

Speaker

Relation

Classication

Style

Transfer

Spelling

Error

Detection

Spam

Classication

Sentence

Compression

Punctuation

Error

Detection

Poem

Generation

Paper

Review

Entity

Generation

Entity

Relation

Classication

Discourse

Connective

Identication

Discourse

Relation

Classication

Preposition

Prediction

Sentence

Expansion(a) SUP-NATINST(this work)

Answer

Generation

Question

Generation

Classification

Minimal

Text

Modification

Incorrect

Answer

Generation

Verification(b) NATINST

QA

Multiple

Choice

QA

Extractive

Bias and

Fairness

QA

Closed

Book

Sentiment

Summarization

NLI

Paraphrase

Topic

Classification

Coreference

Story

Completion

quotesdbs_dbs31.pdfusesText_37
[PDF] mode enregistrement et affichage des modifications openoffice

[PDF] modification document word

[PDF] feuillet d'hypnos 178 analyse

[PDF] feuillets d'hypnos horrible journée

[PDF] feuillets dhypnos en ligne

[PDF] feuillets d'hypnos fragment 141

[PDF] feuillets dhypnos extraits

[PDF] fureur et mystère de rené char pdf

[PDF] feuillets dhypnos pdf

[PDF] grille dévaluation des acquis de la formation

[PDF] rené char feuillets dhypnos

[PDF] comment évaluer les acquis d'une formation

[PDF] l'évaluation en formation d'adultes

[PDF] evaluer les acquis des apprenants

[PDF] évaluation des acquis formation professionnelle