BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL Toutes spécialités BREVET
1506 - FHG FR - 1 C. Page 1 sur 4. SESSION 2015. BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL. Toutes spécialités. BREVET DES MÉTIERS D'ART. Toutes spécialités.
BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL Toutes spécialités BREVET
1506 - FHG FR - 1 C. Page 1 sur 4. SESSION 2015. BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL. Toutes spécialités. BREVET DES MÉTIERS D'ART. Toutes spécialités.
BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL Toutes spécialités BREVET
Nov 14 2017 AP 1506 - FHG FR - 1 C. Page 1 sur 5. SESSION 2015. BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL. Toutes spécialités. BREVET DES MÉTIERS D'ART.
CORRIGÉ
Corrigé. Repère de l'épreuve : C1909-FHG FR. Page 1/4. SESSION 2019. BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL. Toutes spécialités. BREVET DES MÉTIERS D'ART.
NC 1506 FHG HGEC
Repère de l'épreuve : NC1506 FHG HGEC. 1/5. BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL. SESSION 2015 (http://www.ag50pas-guadeloupe.fr) consulté le 14 août 2013.
Corrigé 1506
Repère de l'épreuve : 1506 – FHG HGEC. Page 1 sur 6. BACCALAUREAT PROFESSIONNEL / BREVET DES METIERS D'ART. CORRIGE. SESSION 2015. DUREE : 2 H.
Digital Editions of Historical Fragmentary Texts (DCB Bd. 5)
Sep 29 2021 2.39 Bion
Asymptotic Behavior for Textiles in von-Kármán regime
Dec 20 2019 †Fraunhofer ITWM
Unclassified
Emission Scenario Document for Wood Preservatives. PART4 1. EXAMPLES OF CALCULATION OF LOCAL EMISSION RATES FOR INDUSTRIAL. PREVENTIVE TREATMENTS .
Volume 5 Mathematical Reference
model for 5 different proformas listed in the "Solar Thermal CollectorsQuadratic Efficiency" category in the Simulation Studio. It is very frequent for one
SESSION 2015 - ac-versaillesfr
AP 1506 - FHG FR - 1 C Page 1 sur 5 SESSION 2015 BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL Toutes spécialités BREVET DES MÉTIERS D’ART Toutes spécialités ÉPREUVE DE FRANÇAIS (L’usage du dictionnaire et de la calculatrice est interdit) Coefficient : 25 Durée : 2h30
Searches related to 1506 fhg fr 1 PDF
1506 - FHG FR - 1 Page 1 sur 5 SESSION 2015 BACCALAURÉAT PROFESSIONNEL Toutes spécialités BREVET DES MÉTIERS D’ART Toutes spécialités ÉPREUVE DE FRANÇAIS - ÉPREUVE DU MERCREDI 17 JUIN 2015 - (L’usage du dictionnaire et de la calculatrice est interdit) Coefficient : 25 Durée : 2h30
I. Background
The goal of this rulemaking process is to implement an effective system to collect and permit authorized uses of information concerning potential money laundering associated with non-financed transactions?[1] in the United States real estate market. FinCEN expects that doing so will strengthen the United States' national security and the integrity ...
II. Money Laundering in Real Estate
Treasury, working with law enforcement partners, has highlighted the money laundering risks and typologies associated with the U.S. real estate market. As Treasury explained in its 2020 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing, “[c]riminals with widely divergent levels of financial sophistication use real estate at all ...
III. Current Law
The Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970, as amended by the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (“USA PATRIOT Act”), the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (“AML Act”), and other legislation, is the legislative framework commonly referred to as t...
IV. Prior Rulemakings
In 2002, FinCEN temporarily exempted certain financial institutions, including “persons involved in real estate closings and settlements” and “loan and finance companies,” from the requirement to establish an AML/CFT program. FinCEN explained that it would “continue studying the money laundering risks posed by these institutions in order to develop...
v. Real Estate Geographic Targeting Orders
FinCEN has taken a different approach to all-cash real estate transactions ( i.e.,real estate transactions without financing by a bank, RMLO, or GSE), which represent approximately 20% of real estate sales. When property is purchased without financing, the transaction generally does not involve a bank or other financial institution subject to AML/C...
VI. Commercial Real Estate
In contrast to FinCEN's use of Real Estate GTOs to focus on all-cash transactions involving residential real estate, FinCEN decided at the time not to impose a reporting requirement on all cash commercial real estate transactions. The commercial real estate market is both more diverse and complicated than the residential real estate market and pres...
VII. Real Estate Purchases by Natural Persons
FinCEN recognizes the potential for non-financed purchases by natural persons to facilitate money laundering and other illicit activity. Indeed, the use of natural person nominees can facilitate money laundering involving domestic and foreign bribery and corruption schemes, sanctions evasion, tax evasion, drug trafficking, and fraud, among other ty...
VIII. Scope of Potential Rules
Given the vulnerabilities of the U.S. real estate sector to money laundering and other illicit activities, FinCEN believes that additional regulatory steps may be needed to ensure consistent reporting on a nationwide basis. FinCEN therefore invites comment through this ANPRM on appropriate regulatory frameworks to do so, including possible nationwi...
IX. Request For Comment
FinCEN seeks comments on the questions listed below, but invites any other relevant comments as well. FinCEN encourages commenters to reference specific question numbers to facilitate FinCEN's review of comments.
Georges Griso
, Julia Orliky, Stephan WackerlezDecember 20, 2019
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the investigation of simultaneous homogenization and dimension reduction of textile structures as elasticity problem with an energy in the von-Karman-regime. An extension for deformations is presented allowing to use the decomposition of plate-displacements. The limit problem in terms of displacements is derived with the help of the unfolding operator and yields in the limit the von-Karman plate with linear elastic cell-problems. It is shown, that for homogeneous isotropic beams in the structure, the resulting plate is orthotropic. As application of the obtained limit plate we study the buckling behavior of orthotropic textiles. Keyword: Homogenization, periodic unfolding method, dimension reduction, von-Karman orthotropic plate, Energy minimization under pre-strain, buckling under homogenized pre-strain Mathematics Subject Classication (2010): 35B27, 35J86, 47H05, 74Q05, 74B05, 74K10, 74K20.1 Introduction
In contrast to our rst paper about homogenization of textiles [21], where a geometrical linear elasticity is considered, we investigate here textiles with von-Karman energy. The von-Karman model is a nonlinear plate model, which is stated with respect to displacements and widely used by mathe-maticians and engineers, see [4, 2, 7, 8, 14, 15, 26]. To achieve the von-Karman model in the limit we
consider an elastic energy of orderjje(u")jjL2( ")C"5=2, which is in consensus with [5, 7, 14, 15]. A simultaneous homogenization and dimension reduction of a von-Karman plate was already studied in[23], however in our paper we give the corrector results related on the periodic topology of the textile.
Since the von-Karman plate arises as -Limit from geometrical nonlinear problems, it is necessary toconsider initially deformations. Hence, the homogenization of the textile for von-Karman energy begins
with the extension of a deformation into the holes of the structure. This extension is applied onto the
deformations of the textile beam structure for glued beams. Due to the fact that the limit-plate is stated
with respect to displacements we directly introduce the decomposition of the displacement associated to
the extended deformation, see [4, 18, 17]. For the elementary displacements we establish the Korn-type
estimates giving rise to the asymptotic behavior of the elds. To derive the homogenized model theunfolding and rescaling operator (see for instance [10, 11, 20, 21]) accounting for both homogenization
and dimension reduction is used. For the von-Karman-plate studied here it is necessary to investigate
also the nonlinear term in the Green-St.Venant strain tensor. The additional term yield the von- Karman nonlinearities in the limit. The derived asymptotic limits allow to prove with arguments of -convergence to show that the limit energy in in fact of von-Karman-type. It is proven, that the homogenized limit energy admits minima. The uniqueness, though, is not provable.Sorbonne Universite, CNRS, Universite de Paris, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions (LJLL), F-75005 Paris, France,
griso@ljll.math.upmc.fr yFraunhofer ITWM, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany, orlik@itwm.fhg.de zFraunhofer ITWM, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany, wackerle@itwm.fhg.de 1 Although the initial and the homogenized problem are nonlinear, the cell-problems for the von- Karman plate are linear and in fact the same as achieved for a linear elastic plate. Furthermore, the cell-problems yield for isotropic homogeneous beams an orthotropic plate, which is valid for the von-Karman energy and linear elasticity. The nal part of the paper is devoted to homogenization of the pre-stress in yarns and modelingof the buckling of the von-Karman plate under pre-strain, like in [22, 6, 26, 1], but for an orthotropic
plate.2 Preliminary extension results for deformations and displace-
mentsIn this section,
and0are two bounded domains inRncontaining the origin with Lipschitz
boundaries and such that0. For every" >0, we denote
and 0"="0. In Lemma 2.1
we prove an extension result for deformations inH1( ")n. The lemma below is based on the rigidity theorem obtained by G. Friesecke, R. James and S. Muller in[13]. Here, for the starshaped open sets with respect to a ball, we use a variant of this theorem which
explicitly gives the dependence of the constants in the estimates in terms of only two parameters which
depend on the geometry of the domain: its diameter and the radius of the ball (see [3, 19]).Lemma 2.1.For every deformationvinH1(
")nthere exists a deformationevinH1(0")nsatisfying
evj "=v; distev;SO(n) L2( 0")C dist(v;SO(n)) L2( "):(2.1)The constant does not depend on".
Proof.First, some classical recalls and then the proof. (i) Since is a bounded domain with Lipschitz boundary, there existN2N,R1andR2two strictly positive constants and a nite setfO1;:::;ONgof open subsets of , each of diameter less thanR1and starshaped with respect to a ball of radiusR2(B(Ai;R2),Ai2 Oi) such that N[ k=1O k: As a consequence, there existsrsuch that for everyOi,i2 f1;:::;Ngthere exists a chain from O 1toOi O l1=O1;Ol2; :::;Olp=Oi; p2 f1;:::;Ng such that, ifp >1 one hasOlj\ Olj+1,j2 f1;:::;p1g, contains a ball of radiusr. (ii) LetObe an open set inRnincluded in the ballB(A;R1) and starshaped with respect to the ballB(A;R2),R1>0; R2>0. Theorem II.1.1 in [3] claims that for every deformation v2H1(O)n, there exist a matrixR2SO(n) anda2Rnsuch thatThe constantCdepends only onR1R
2andn.
TransformOby a dilation of ratio" >0 and centerA, the above result gives: for every deformation v2H1(O")nwhereO":="O, there exist a matrixR2SO(n) anda2Rnsuch thatThe constantCdoes not depend on".
2 (iii) and0being two bounded domains inRnwith Lipschitz boundaries and such that
0. There exists a continuous linear extension operatorP0fromH1( )nintoH1(0)nsatisfying
8v2H1(
)n;P0(v)j =v;kP0(v)kL2(0)CkvkL2(
);kP(v)kH1(0)CkvkH1(
If we transform
and0by the same dilation of ratio"(and centerO2
), this extension operator induces an extension operatorP0"fromH1( ")3intoH1(0")3satisfying
8v2H1(
")3;(P0"(v)j "=v;kP0"(v)kL2(0")CkvkL2(
kP0"(v)kL2(
0")+"krP0"(v)kL2(
0")CkvkL2(
")+"krvkL2(The constants do not depend on".
Now, consider a deformationv2H1(
")n. We apply (ii) with the open setsOi;"=Ai+"(OiAi), there exist matricesRi2SO(n) and vectorsai2Rnsuch thatThe constantCdoes not depend on".
Then, using the second part of (i), we compareRitoR1as well asaitoa1,i2 f1;:::;Ng. As a consequence, one obtains that kva1R1xkL2( ")C"kdist(rv;SO(3))kL2( ");krvR1kL2( e)Ckdist(rv;SO(n))kL2(The constants do not depend on".
Now, we dene the extension ofv. We set
ev=P0"(va1R1x) +a1+R1xa.e. in 0":We easily check (2.1).3 The structure
3.1 Parameterization of the yarns
To see the parametrization of yarns and the structure we refer to [21]. Nevertheless, we shortlyrepeat the most important denitions and results. The middle line of a beam is paramtrized by rescaled
function "="(z" ) of (z) =8 >>>:;ifz2[0;];6(z)2(12)24(z)3(12)31
ifz2[;1]; ifz2[1;1]; (2z) ifz2[1;2]:(3.1)Then the beams in the structure are dened by
P (1)r:=z2R3jz12(0;L);(z2;z3)2(";")2; P(2)r:=z2R3jz22(0;L);(z1;z3)2(";")2: for the reference beams in the two directions. Then the curved beams are dened by P (1;q)":=n x2R3jx= (1;q)"(z); z2P(1)ro ;P(2;p)":=n x2R3jx= (2;p)"(z); z2P(2)ro 3 1221Figure 1:
The domain YY= (0;1)2(2;2), a quarter of the periodicity cell of the full structure. with the dieomorphisms (1;q)"(z):=M(1;q)"(z1) +z2e2+z3n(1;q)"(z1); (2;p)"(z):=M(2;p)"(z2) +z1e1+z3n(2;p)"(z2); and the corresponding middle lines M (1;q)"(z1):=z1e1+q"e2+ (1)q+1"(z1)e3; M(2;p)"(z2):=p"e1+z2e2+ (1)p"(z2)e3:3.2 Parameterization of the whole structure
Denote
"the whole structure (see [21] for details) 2N"[ p=0P (1;q)"[2N"[ q=0P (2;p)" ":=!(2";2"); != (0;L)2:(3.2)3.3 An extension result
The presented extension heavily depends on the fact that the beams are glued. For a more generalcontact condition as in [21] it is necessary to treat the two directions separately and obtain two defor-
mations, which give the same limit forg""4. Nevertheless, the more general case would exceed the bounds of this paper.Proposition 3.1.For every deformationvinH1(
")3there exists a deformationevinH1( ")3sat- isfying evj "=v; distev;SO(3) L2( ")C dist(v;SO(3)) L2( "):(3.3)The constant does not depend on".
Proof.Now that the general extension for Lipschitz domains in nonlinear elasticity is recalled in the
above lemma, we specify the extension procedure for the the domain 4Figure 2: First extension domain
Figure 3: Periodicity cell of the periodic plate with holes.First, we divide the domain
"into portions included in domains isometric to the parallelotope (0;"+ 2")(0;2")(0;4")1as depicted in Figure 2. These portions include a curved beam and parts of the beams in the perpendicular direction with which the beam is in contact. Besides, after a rotation and/or a re ection, all the portions are of the same form and itself Lipschitz-domains. Furthermore, note that these portions intersect each other and every contact cylinderCpq(2";2") withCpq= (p"";p"+")(q"";q"+") is used in four of such domains. Since every portion is a Lipschitz domain the extension procedure given in Lemma 2.1 is applicable for everyv2H1( ") and yields an extension to the parallelotope (e.g. (p"";(p+1)"+")(q" ";q"+")(2";2")). As second step, we dene new domains included in (p"";(p+1)"+") (q"";(q+ 1)"+")(2";2") by collecting four of the above portions as depicted in Figure 3. Note that the contact cylinders in every corner of the new domain is used by two portions. Obviously this domain is again a Lipschitz domain and hence we extend all the elds into the holes using againLemma 2.1.
To obtain the full extension we reassemble the structure. To do this, note that the domains (p" ";(p+1)"+")(q"";(q+1)"+")(2";2") have an overlap. This overlap includes everybeam twice and the contact cylinders again fourfold, i.e. the overlap consists exactly of the domains
before the last extension. Together with the interportions from the step before we obtain that the contact cylinders are the most used domains for the extension, namely eight times. This in uences the estimate and nally give the nal extensionevwhich satises distev;SO(3) L2( ")C dist(v;SO(3)) L2( where the constant does not depend on". By construction, we haveevj "=v.Henceforth, we use the extended deformationv2H1( "), which is a deformation of a periodicplate without holes. This allows to use the results in the papers [4] and general results of [12], [21], [2].
The structure is clamped on its lateral boundary. Moreover, in contrast to [21] here we assume a glued
contact, which corresponds to the caseg"0 in [21]. This allows to obtain one deformation eld for1 We reduce the parallelotopes that are in contact with the boundary of!. 5 the whole structure "instead of one for each beam as in [21].Denote
=@!\ fx2= 0g= (0;L) f0g;"= (2";2"):The set of the admissible deformations are
V ":=n v2H1( ")3jsuch thatv=Ida.e. on@ "\"o D ":=n v2H1( ")3jsuch thatv=Ida.e. on "o :(3.4) Remark 3.2.Every deformation belonging toV"is extended in(0;L)(";0)(2";2")by settingv=Idin this open set. Then, Proposition 3.1 gives an extension ofvwhose restriction to belongs toD"and satises(3.3).4 The non-linear elasticity problem
Set Y0:= (0;2)2;Y:= (0;2)2(2;2):
LetY Ybe the reference cell of the beam structure. The cellYis deduced fromY(see Figure 1) after two symmetries with respect to the planesy1= 1 andy2= 1.Denote
cWthe local elastic energy density, then the total elastic energy is J "(v) =Z "cW";rvdxZ
"f "(vId)dx;8v2V";(4.1) whereIdis the identity map. The local density energycW:YS3!R+[ f+1gis given by cW"(;F) =8
:Q" ;12 (FTFI3) if det(F)>0; +1if det(F)0; whereS3is the space of 33 symmetric matrices. The quadratic formQis dened by Q(y;S) =aijkl(y)SijSklfor a.e.y2 Yand for allS2S3; where theaijkl's belong toL1(Y) and are periodic with respect toe1ande2. Moreover, the tensorais symmetric, i.e.,aijkl=ajikl=aklji. Also it is positive denite and satises9c0>0;such thatc0SijSijaijkl(y)SijSklfor a.e.y2 Yand for allS2S3:(4.2)
Note, that the energy density
cW"(x;rv(x)) =8
:Qx" ;E(v)(x) if det(rv(x))>0; +1if det(rv(x))0;for a.e.x2 depends on the strain tensorE(v) =12 (rv)TrvI3withI3the unit 33 matrix. Remark 4.1.As a classical example of a local elastic energy satisfying the above assumptions, we mention the following St Venant-Kirchho's law for which cW(F) =8
:8 tr(FTFI3)2+4 tr(FTFI3)2ifdet(F)>0 +1ifdet(F)0: 6Now we are in the position to state the problem.
Therefore, set
m "= infv2V"J"(v)2:5 Preliminary estimates
5.1 Recalls about the plate deformations
Denotex0= (x1;x2)2R2and
U ":=n u2H1( ")3ju= 0 a.e. on "o The deformations and the terms of their decompositions are estimated in terms ofkdist(rv;SO(3))kL2( this is why the lemma below plays a crucial role Lemma 5.1.Letv2V"be a deformation andev2D"the extended deformation given by Proposition3.1 and Remark 3.2. The associated displacementu=evIdbelongs toU"and satises
ke(u)kL2( ")C0kdist(rv;SO(3))kL2( ")+C1"5=2kdist(rv;SO(3))k2L2(
")(5.1) The constants do not depend on"andv(they depend on!,Yand). Proof.In [4, Lemma 4.3] it is proved that there exists a constant which does not depend on"andev such that ke(u)kL2( ")Ckdist(rev;SO(3))kL2( 1 +1"5=2kdist(rev;SO(3))kL2(
Then, Proposition 3.1 gives a constant which does not depend on"andvsuch that distev;SO(3) L2( ")C dist(v;SO(3)) L2( This ends the proof of the lemma.5.2 Recalls about the plate displacements Set H1 (!):=2H1(!)j= 0 a.e. on H 2 (!):=2H1(!)j= 0;r= 0 a.e. on Below we recall a denition from [11, Chapter 11] (see also [20, 16]) Denition 5.2.Elementary displacement are elementsueofH1( ")3satisfying for a.e.x= (x0;x3)2 "(wherex02!) u e;1(x) =U1(x0) +x3R1(x0); u e;2(x) =U2(x0) +x3R2(x0); u e;3(x) =U3(x0): HereU= (U1;U2;U3)2H1(!)3andR=R1e1+R2e22H1(!)2:2
It is well known that the existence of a minimizer forJ"is still an open problem. 7 The following lemma is proved in [11, Theorem 11.4 and Proposition 11.6] Lemma 5.3.Letube inU". The displacementucan be decomposed as the sum u=ue+u(5.2) of an elementary displacementueand a residual displacementu, both belonging toU"and satisfying U 2H1 (!)3;R 2H1 (!)2;kukL2( ")+"krukL2( ")C"ke(u)kL2( "):(5.3)Moreover, one has
kU kH1(!)+"kU3kH1(!)+kRkH1(!)C"1=2ke(u)kL2(
@U3+RL2(!)C"
1=2ke(u)kL2(
kukL2( ")+"ku3kL2( ")Cke(u)kL2( 2 X ;=1 @u@x L2( @u3@x 3 L2( ")Cke(u)kL2( 2 X =1 @u@x 3 L2( @u3@x L2( C" ke(u)kL2( "):(5.4)The constants do not depend on".
5.3 Assumptions on the forces
The forces have to admit a certain scaling with respect to the"-scaling of the domain. For the textile we require forces of the type f ";1="2f1; f ";2="2f2; f ";3="3f3;a.e. in ";(5.5) withf2L2(!)3. In order to obtain at the limit a von-Karman model, the applied forces must satisfy a condition kfkL2(!)C:(5.6) This constant depends on the reference cellY, the mid-surface!of the structure and the local elastic energyW(see Lemma 5.4). The scaling of the force gives rise to the order of the energy in the elasticity problem. We prove this, in lemma below. Lemma 5.4.Letv2V"be a deformation such thatJ"(v)0. Assume(5.5)on the forces. There exists a constantCindependent of"and the applied forces such that, ifkfkL2(!)< Cone has kdist(rv;SO(3))kL2( ")C"5=2kfkL2(The constantCdoes not depend on".
Proof.Using (4.2) gives rise to the estimation
c0kdist(rv;SO(3))k2L2(
")Z "f "(vId)dx:(5.7) 8 Introduceu=evId2U"the associated displacement to the extended deformation (see Lemma 5.1).Then, with (5.5) and the estimates (5.4)
3we obtain
Z "f "(vId)dx"5=2kfkL2(!)kukL2( ")+"7=2kf3kL2(!)ku3kL2( "5=2kfkL2(!)kukL2( ")+"7=2kf3kL2(!)ku3kL2(C2"5=2kfkL2(!)ke(u)kL2(
"):(5.8) Eventually, the above inequality with (5.7) and Lemma 5.1 give c0kdist(rv;SO(3))k2L2(
")C2C0"5=2kfkL2(quotesdbs_dbs24.pdfusesText_30[PDF] in1606fhg hgec corrigé
[PDF] cosmologie et géodynamique interne pdf
[PDF] 9 pouces en cm
[PDF] 27 pouces en cm
[PDF] 16 pouces en cm
[PDF] 50 pouces en cm
[PDF] séquence égalité filles garçons maternelle
[PDF] instruction civique égalité fille garçon
[PDF] emc égalité fille garçon cycle 3
[PDF] plan cancer 2014 résumé
[PDF] le plan cancer c'est quoi
[PDF] plan cancer 2014 2019
[PDF] plan cancer 2014 dispositif d'annonce
[PDF] plan cancer 2009