Article 2(4) Contents
2 and para. 2) on the Declaration of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity on the aerial and naval military attack
CRC/C/GC/14 Convention on the Rights of the Child
29-May-2013 provides a legal analysis of article 3 paragraph 1 (chapter IV)
CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS
Article 38. Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles. 33 to 37 the Security Council may
GUIDE DANALYSE DE LA LITTERATURE ET GRADATION DES
niveau de preuve scientifique fournis par la littérature médicale sont des éléments V. ANALYSE D'UN ARTICLE DE PRONOSTIC (ANALYSE DE COHORTE).
Exclusion: Articles 12 and 17 Qualification Directive (2011/95/EU)
in accordance with the EASO founding regulation UnHCr was invited to and did express comments on the draft Judicial Analysis. All these comments were taken
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on the
14-Jan-2011 Article 101(2) stipulates that the agreement shall be automatically void. 21. The analysis of horizontal co-operation agreements has certain ...
Patriarchy and Womens Subordination: A theoretical analysis
cause of women's subordination. This article hence
Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful
ally wrongful act. See paragraph (1) of the commentary to article 1. 73 For examples of analysis of different obligations see United.
Analyse Détaillée Article par Article
Analyse Détaillée Article par Article La commission a fait le choix de présenter les figures des articles dont Mme Jessus est co-auteur
WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX GATT 1994 – Article XX (Jurisprudence
In US – Gasoline the Appellate Body concluded its analysis by emphasizing the function of. Article XX with respect to national measures taken for
SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION
SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION
Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union.Freephone number (*):
00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed.
More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Print ISBN 978-92-9243-804-3 doi:10.2847/647077 BZ-02-15-934-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9243-803-6 doi:10.2847/711549 BZ-02-15-934-EN-N© European Asylum Support Office 2015
Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the
information contained herein. CEASCommon European Asylum System
Contributors ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϯ
Preface ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϳ
1.Exclusion an overview ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϭϬ
Contents
4.Procedural aspects ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϰϭ
... 44Appendix B Decision Trees ........................................................................
.............................................. 53Appendix C Methodology ........................................................................
............................................... 60Appendix D Select bibliography ........................................................................
...................................... 66 ....................... 68Recitals
1.1 1.2 1.3Mandatory exclusion
1.4ͿIbid.
1.5The roles of the CJEU and ECtHR
2.1 provided 2.1.12.1.1.1
to return there2.1.1.2
ͿIbid.
ͿIbid͘
2.1.1.3
2.1.2 of residence2.1.2.1
2.1.2.2
2.1.2.3
2.2 2.2.12.2.1.1
2.2.1.2
stateMember State
2.2.1.3
2.2.2 against humanity2.2.2.1
Crime against peace Aggression
ϴbis (
2.2.2.2
War crime
th2.2.2.3
Crime against humanity
ͿIbid͘
2.2.32.2.3.1
Law of Refugee Status͕Ϯ
2.2.3.2
ment2.2.3.3
2.2.3.4
Territorial and temporal scope Outside the country of refuge prior to admission 2.2.42.2.4.1
Material scope
2.2.4.2
Terrorism
2.2.4.3
Personal scope
ples 2.3 2.3.1 Criteria for determining individual responsibility 2.3.2Applicant as perpetrator of excludable acts
2.3.3 responsibility 2.3.4 2.3.52.3.5.1
ͿIbid.
of torture2.3.5.2
Joint criminal enterprise/common purpose liability 2.3.6 of authorityMembership
2.3.8 2.4 2.5 3.1 3.2 3.2.1 against humanity 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 of theMember State
3.3 3.4 4.1Serious reasons for considering
4.1.1Standard of proof
by the Supreme Court to paraphrase them 4.1.2Burden of proof
4.1.3 4.2Individual assessment
ROME STATUTE
Genocide
Crimes against humanity
War crimes
Individual criminal responsibility
Responsibility of commanders and other superiors
Mental element
Grounds for excluding criminal responsibility
Mistake of fact or mistake of law
Preliminary remarks
concerned incur individual responsibility for these acts͍ of the country of refuge͍ to members of courts and tribunalsProfessional development curriculum
Completed thus far͗
Involvement of experts
EASO PDS development
CourtCase name/reference/date
Key words/relevance/main points
Cases cited
CJEU CJEU ipso facto ipso factoY and Z
Nawras Bolbol
Hungary
Germany
CourtCase name/reference/date
Key words/relevance/main points
Cases cited
Bevándorlási és
Állampolgársági Hivatal͗͗ϮϬϭϬ͗ϯϱϭϭϳ͘ϲ͘ϮϬϭϬ
Germany
CourtCase name/reference/date
Key words/relevance/main points
Cases cited
non-refoulementGermany
Nawras Bolbol
Hungary
CJEUGermany
CourtCase name/reference/date
Key words/relevance/main points
Cases cited
ECtHR A the Netherlands ECtHR Saadi Italy non-refoulementAl-Adsani
the United KingdomGermany
No ECtHRUnited Kingdom
Al-Agha
Romania
Belgium and
Greece
ECtHRH.L.R.
France
Chahal
the United Kingdom ECtHRChahal
United Kingdom
Vilvarajah and Others
theUnited Kingdom
ECtHR AhmedAustria
Chahal
the United Kingdom CourtCase name/reference/date
Key words/relevance/main points
Cases cited
ECtHRCruz Varas
Sweden
Soering
ECtHRVilvarajah
United Kingdom
ECtHRSoering
United Kingdom
Abdulaziz
Cabales
andMember State/
CourtCase name/reference/date
Key words/relevance/main points
Cases cited
Court of Appeal
Secretary of State for
the Home DepartmentϮϬϭϱŝǀϲϴϰϵ͘ϳ͘ϮϬϭϱMember State/
Courtquotesdbs_dbs33.pdfusesText_39[PDF] Rencontres & perspectives 2015
[PDF] Usages pédagogiques de l ENT. Mener un travail collaboratif en utilisant le forum et les dossiers partagés.
[PDF] Réussir vos projets de développement en Inde
[PDF] Formation-action L intelligence collective au service de l agilité et du leadership dans la complexité
[PDF] DISPOSITIF SPORT-ART-ÉTUDES CRITÈRES DE SÉLECTION ENSEIGNEMENT SECONDAIRE II ANNÉE SCOLAIRE SPORT
[PDF] DOSSIER DE PRESSE. A Nancy, la rentrée se fait aussi chez les 0-3 ans. Au sein du service petite enfance! Page 1 sur 7
[PDF] Le coût pédagogique : La prise en charge du coût pédagogique est plafonnée à : 18 TTC par heure de formation pour les organismes de formation
[PDF] Sommaire. 1. Présentation de 2J Associés. 2. Nos métiers. 3. Nos valeurs. 4. Nos offres. 5. Exemples de missions réalisées
[PDF] Le présent document vise à compléter la réponse de la COFACE au questionnaire de la Commission européenne, soumise en ligne (cf : annexe).
[PDF] DEMANDE D ADHÉSION 2016 MON ASSURANCE SANTÉ À LA CARTE
[PDF] Gestion de sociétés et d entreprises
[PDF] Observatoire réforme du collège
[PDF] PROGRAMME SPORTIF modifié Championnats de France Hiver et Été
[PDF] Modifications légales concernant les demandeurs d asile, les citoyens UE et leurs membres de famille, les procédures 9ter,...