Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States provides that a state should possess a defined territory Traditional definitions of the state
Previous PDF | Next PDF |
The Creation of States in International Law By James Crawford
The Creation of States in International Law By James Crawford Oxford: Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press 1979 498pp £18·00 WE are told not once
[PDF] James Crawford The Creation of States in International Law Oxford
The Creation of States in International Law Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2nd edition, 2006 Pp 70 £80 , € 116 58 (hb)
[PDF] SECESSION: International Law Perspectives - Corte Interamericana
contents 6 A normative 'due process' in the creation of States 7 Secession and the law of State succession 208 8 Are there gaps in the international law of secession? 231 ciise/ pdf /Commission-Report pdf (last visited May 11, 2004), p
[PDF] The CREATION and LEGAL STATUS of STATES - Lund University
What distinguishes the rules and principles of public international law from mere morality is that main questions: How are states created according to public international law? (1 June 2003) 230 See
[PDF] The Creation of New States in International Law - CiteSeerX
2 2 1 Defining Recognition of States in International Law 22 The creation of states is a complex process because it is a mixture of facts and laws CRS Report for Congress, fpc state gov/documents/organization/110841 pdf
[PDF] The Classification of States and the Creation of Status within the
The International Response to the Classification of "rogue states" IV The Creation of Second-Rate Legal Status in International Law? 1 Pre-emptive Self- Defence against mentaries(e) pdf >, accessed on 6 May2003 On the impact of this ICJ
[PDF] The statehood of collapsed states in Public International Law - Dialnet
Indeed, Article 1 of the Convention states that, a State as a person of international law should posses a permanent population, a defined territory, a government
[PDF] at International Law - Melbourne Law School
Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States provides that a state should possess a defined territory Traditional definitions of the state
[PDF] INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW - Office of Legal Affairs
Second Report on State Responsibility : The Origin of International Responsibility, by Roberto Ago, Special Rapporteur, in Yearbook of the International Law
[PDF] the crucible act 2 quotes and meanings
[PDF] the crucible act 3
[PDF] the crucible act 3 activity
[PDF] the crucible act 3 essay
[PDF] the crucible act 3 quiz
[PDF] the crucible act 3 quotes and analysis
[PDF] the crucible act 3 quotes and meaning
[PDF] the crucible act 3 quotes explained
[PDF] the crucible act 3 quotes quizlet
[PDF] the crucible act 3 quotes with page numbers
[PDF] the crucible act 3 summary prepscholar
[PDF] the crucible act 3 summary quizlet
[PDF] the crucible act 3 summary shmoop
[PDF] the crucible act 3 summary sparknotes
1
SOVEREIGNTY SUNK?
INTERNATIONAL LAW
The Position of 'Sinking States' at International LawDEREK WONG*
Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States provides that a stateshould possess a defined territory. Traditional definitions of the state also include this
requirement. What, then, of a state that becomes inundated with water such that its nationals leave its territory? What are the consequences if a state becomes completely inundated and has no territory above sea level? Does this automatically result in extinction? This article examines the issue in four parts. First, it is observed that both traditional and contemporary definitions of the state include a requirement of territory. It is noted that the requirement has been loosely applied. Secondly, it is argued that mass migration of a s abandonment of sovereignty or a loss of statehood. Thirdly, the issue of state extinction via loss of territory is considered. It is contended that the presumption of continuity while a useful consideration cannot provide an answer. It is argued that the purchase of territory short ofcession would not be sufficient to satisfy the territory requirement. Nevertheless, it is
submitted that the state will not become extinct once there is no territory above sea level:
international law would not tolerate such instability. Instead, a necessary legal construction would be imposed: a fiction that prevents the state from becoming extinct despite the first wave washing over the last rock. Finally, solutions proposed in the existing literature are examined and it is ultimately concluded that none provide a satisfactory or complete answer.CONTENTS
I Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2
II ........................................................................................... 7 A The Requirement of Territory in State Formation ........................................ 71 No Settled Definition of a State ....................................................... 7
2 Territory and Early Definitions ........................................................ 7
3 The Montevideo Convention ............................................................ 8
4 Territory and Later Definitions ........................................................ 9
B Application of the Territory Requirement .................................................. 10III Abandonment? ........................................................................................................ 13
IV Extinction ................................................................................................................ 16
A A Lacuna in the Law .................................................................................. 16
B Will Extinction Automatically Follow from a Total Loss ofTerritory? .................................................................................................... 17
1 The Presumption of Continuity ...................................................... 17
2 Membership of the UN: A Special Case? ...................................... 19
* BCom/LLB (UNSW); LLM (Cantab). This article is based on a dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an LLM at the University of Cambridge. I would like to thank Professor James Crawford for his supervision and advice, as well as Professor Jane McAdam, Mr Sahib Singh, Ms Sophie Shaw and Mr Juan-Carlos Dastis, who reviewed and commented on earlier drafts. Special thanks are due to Mr Quang Trinh, with whom I co-authored the 2013 Philip C Jessup Moot Court Compromis (which, in part, raised similar issues), as well as to the 2013 Compromis Review Committee and, in particular, Ms Dagmar Butte. I am grateful to the three anonymous peer reviewers of the Melbourne Journal of International Law for their helpful comments. Any errors, of course, are mine alone.2 Melbourne Journal of International Law [Vol 14
3 The Territorial Nature of Statehood The Case for
Extinction ....................................................................................... 20
4 Sovereign Territory? ...................................................................... 23
5 Necessary Legal Constructs ........................................................... 31
6 The Importance of Recognition...................................................... 36
V Potential Solutions .................................................................................................. 38
VI Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 44