2 oct 2009 · The second U S -Iran seismic workshop was held on June 29–July 1, 2009, at the could be broadcast at the time of the drill and drill scripts to suggest several “ sprawl has hit the wall,” make the enactment of more stringent
| Previous PDF | Next PDF |
[PDF] Earthquake re-enactment script
Earthquake re-enactment script There must be movements for each of the commands The students must carry out the commands – get under the tables etc
[PDF] Lessons From the Great East Japan Earthquake - World Bank
Programme's (UNEP) expert mission on Japan's earthquake waste 209 Box 24 1 Livelihood large-scale disasters in Japan, enactment of new legislation
[PDF] Aftershocks - Ronin Films
Newcastle Workers' Club at the time of a serious earthquake in December 1989 re-enactment nor a documentary, the film uses the words of these survivors, Compare the reactions of Lyn and Alf to the disaster and its aftermath Script a
[PDF] A GUIDE TO RADIO COMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS FOR - ITU
The post earthquake period presents an opportunity to minimize future risks through enactment or strengthening of land use and building codes as rebuilding
[PDF] Tehran, Iran Disaster Risk Management Profile - ALNAP
The principal language of the country is Persian (Farsi), which is written in Arabic script other lithosphere plates around Iran have caused disastrous earthquakes in the country, with Enactment of building code under standard No 2800 as
[PDF] A Program of Studies on the Socioeconomic Effects of Earthquake
research agenda on the socioeconomic aspects of earthquake predictions The National sures, and enacting a hazard reduction program to minimize community record keeping by news organizations (of news scripts, broadcast tapes,
[PDF] EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRUM MODELS FOR AUSTRALIA
have been developed in Australia to address local seismic conditions mandatory since enactment of building codes is a state subject In most spatial scripts and algorithms that can simulate interactions between user specified variables
[PDF] Report - Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
2 oct 2009 · The second U S -Iran seismic workshop was held on June 29–July 1, 2009, at the could be broadcast at the time of the drill and drill scripts to suggest several “ sprawl has hit the wall,” make the enactment of more stringent
[PDF] The Fukushima Daiichi accident Technical Volume 3 - Scientific
Protection of personnel at the NPP following the earthquake and tsunami ( ICRP) on 21 March 2011 that includes quotes from its generally applicable recommendations The The Act was enacted on 26 August 2011, promulgated on
In 1970, unusual seismic activity convinced scientists that a
The above scenario might sound like a movie script, but it represents the ( Richter scale magnitude) earthquake caused severe damage throughout a 1000 km2 was enactment of still more stringent building codes throughout the state
[PDF] earthwatts - Top Achat - Le Style Et La Mode
[PDF] eas dos inscription concours - Centre hospitalier de Fontainebleau
[PDF] EAS Forum - Email
[PDF] EASA Safety Information Bulletin - EASA Airworthiness Directives - Anciens Et Réunions
[PDF] EASA Safety Information Notice - EASA ADs - Anciens Et Réunions
[PDF] EASE II - GCE Group - France
[PDF] Ease of use - AEG Power Solutions
[PDF] Ease On In Tenor Sax..mus - Anciens Et Réunions
[PDF] Easergy Studio v7.0.0 - Release Notes v1.0
[PDF] EasgSludeni - EASYSTUDENT Residence Etudiante Toulouse
[PDF] EasgSludenl - EASYSTUDENT Residence Etudiante Toulouse
[PDF] eaSI courriel – Instructions d`embarquement - Hapag - Anciens Et Réunions
[PDF] EaSI » 2014-2020 - Bureau Alsace Europe
[PDF] Easicult® S - France
PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
RESEARCH CENTER
PEER 2009/02
OCTOBER 2009
PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Improving Earthquake Mitigation through Innovations and Applications in Seismic Science, Engineering,Communication, and Response
Proceedings of a U.S.-Iran Seismic Workshop
June 29-July 1, 2009
Irvine, California
Improving Earthquake Mitigation through Innovations and Applications in Seismic Science, Engineering,Communication, and Response
Proceedings of a U.S.-Iran Seismic Workshop
June 29-July 1, 2009
Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center of the
National Academies of Sciences and Engineering
100 Academy Way
Irvine, California
PEER Report 2009/02
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
College of Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
October 2009
iiiABSTRACT
The second U.S.-Iran seismic workshop was held on June 29-July 1, 2009, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center of the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering, Irvine, California. The workshop was supported by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in collaboration with the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, and Sharif University of Technology. The theme of this workshop was Improving Earthquake Mitigation through Innovations and Applications in Seismic Science, Engineering, Communication, and Response. This report contains the collection of the papers presented at the 2009 workshop, and participants' recommendations for future collaboration between U.S. and Iranian earthquake scientists and engineers. Yousef Bozorgnia, Sanaz Rezaeian, and William Anderson vINTRODUCTION
2008 Seismic Workshop
Following an extended period of planning, on June 8-9, 2008, a U.S.-Iran invitational workshop on the "Seismic Performance of Adobe and Masonry Structures" was held atSharif University of Technology in
Tehran. The workshop was organized
by Sharif University of Technology (SUT), in collaboration with the U.S.National Academy of Sciences and the
Pacific Earthquake Engineering
Research Center (PEER), UC Berkeley.
The workshop involved specialists
from 14 Iranian institutions and anAmerican delegation comprising
Daniel Abrams of the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; William Anderson representing the U.S. National Academy of Sciences; Yousef Bozorgnia of PEER, UC Berkeley; Ahmad Hamid of Drexel University; Robert Hamilton representing the U.S. National Academy of Sciences; Richard Klingner of the University of Texas at Austin; and Fred Webster of Fred Webster and Associates in Menlo Park,California.
The topic of adobe and masonry vulnerability was selected because of the extensive damage to this form of construction from earthquakes in Iran, including the Bam earthquake of December 26, 2003. Twenty-three technical papers were presented. The workshop concluded with a panel session that identified topics for future research collaboration. The workshop was followed with a one-day public seminar on June 10, 2008, on "Seismic Hazard Reduction," also held at Sharif University. In the last session of the public seminar, the participants suggested research topics for future seismic cooperation. Those topics are listed in the appendix of this report. Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, June 9, 2008 vi2009 Seismic Workshop The second U.S.-Iran seismic workshop was held on June 29-July 1, 2009, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center of the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering, Irvine,California. The workshop was
supported by the U.S. Nationa l Academy of Sciences, in collaboration with the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), and Sharif University of Technology (SUT). The theme of this workshop was Improving Earthquake Mitigation through Innovations and Applications in Seismic Science, Engineering, Communication, and Response. Numerous U.S. and Iranian earthquake engineers and scientists participated in the workshop and gave presentations. The agenda of the workshop is attached. The papers presented at the workshop were edited by Yousef Bozorgnia (PEER, UC Berkeley), Sanaz Rezaeian (PEER, UC Berkeley), and William Anderson (U.S. National Academy ofSciences).
On July 1, 2009, the final day of the workshop, the participants had an open discussion about possibilities for future cooperation between seismic experts from both countries. A summary of the open discussion is attached. We thank all participants of the workshops from both countries for their time and efforts. These workshops in 2008 and 2009 would not have been possible without the continuous support and encouragement of Glenn Schweitzer of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Dr.Tabatabaee
(SUT), Dr. Vafai (SUT), and Dr. Pak (SUT) spent an enormous amount of time coordinating the efforts of the Iranian seismic researchers. We gratefully appreciate their time, efforts, and cooperation. Sanaz Rezaeian (PEER, UC Berkeley) diligently assisted in organizing the proceedings of the workshop; her efforts are greatly appreciated. Merc Fox (U.S. NationalAcademy of Sciences) carefully worked on all de
tails of the logistics for the 2009 workshop; we appreciate her dedication.Yousef Bozorgnia and William Anderson
viiIrvine, California, July 1, 2009
ixSUMMARY OF THE WORKSHOP CONCLUDING SESSION
On July 1, 2009, the final day of the U.S.-Iran Seismic Workshop, the participants had an open discussion about possibilities for the future cooperation between seismic experts from both countries. The following topics were recommended for future seismic cooperation by the workshop participants: I. Priority List of Technical Topics for Seismic Cooperation: 1. Seismic performance and retrofit of adobe and masonry buildings, especially residential and school buildings, including a pilot progr am for implementing candidate retrofit designs. 2.Multidisciplinary seismic risk reduction of lifelines, including lifelines components, structures, systems and networks.
3. Seismic risk reduction of geological and geotechnical hazards such as liquefaction and landslides. 4. Integrated multidisciplinary seismic risk management, including reducing the socio- economic impacts of earthquakes, emergency response management, public risk management and policy. 5. Development of a global risk evaluation system encompassing the derivation of urban and regional vulnerability functions (city inventory and human loss). 6. Earth science, paleoseismological, earthquake source, and seismic hazard studies. 7. Other seismic issues of interest to both the U.S. and Iranian earthquake research communities. II. Framework of Technical Cooperation. The following was recommended by the participants: 1. Scientific and engineering interactions among researchers, practitioners, academic institutions, and other research and educational organizations in the two countries are encouraged. 2. Creation of a non-governmental joint committee to draft planning details for seismic cooperation. The responsibilities of the joint committee should include:Recommendations on duration, scope, budget, potential funding agencies, etc., for the seismic cooperative program.
Creation of sub-committees for each of the technical topics listed above, and coordination of their activities. 3. Sharif University of Technology and the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, together with other interested scientific organizations in the two countries, will act as points of contact in promoting the process of seismic cooperation as listed above. xiAGENDA
MONDAY JUNE 29, 2009
7:45 - 8:30 Breakfast
8:30 - 9:00 Opening - Thomas Jordan, Ali Pak, and Yousef Bozorgnia
9:00 - 10:00 Keynote Presentation - Lucile Jones, United States Geological Survey:
Engaging a Community in Seismic Risk Reduction: Lessons in Science and Communication from the Great Southern California Shakeout10:00 - 10:15 Break
10:15 - 12:15 Seismic Hazard - Daniel Abrams, Session Chair
Thomas Jordan, University of Southern California:
Opportunities for Seismic Risk Reduction Using Earthquake SystemScience
Manuchehr Ghorashi, Geological Survey of Iran:
Living with Earthquakes: Know Your Faults
Eric Fielding, Jet Propulsion Laboratory:
Studies of Earthquake Ruptures and Fault Zone Characteristics withSAR Interferometry (InSAR)
Sanaz Rezaeian, University of California at Berkeley:Simulation of Ground Motion Time-Histories
12:15 - 1:15 Lunch
1:15 - 2:45 Multi-Disciplinary Research and Risk Reduction - Richard Klingner,
Session Chair
Yousef Bozorgnia, University of California at Berkeley: Crucial Role of Coordinated Multi-Disciplinary Seismic ResearchMaziar Hosseini, Tehran Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization: Seismic Reduction: A Community-Based Approach