[PDF] WIND TUNNEL TESTS OF THE GA (W)-2 AIRFOIL WIH 20% AILERON, 25



Previous PDF Next PDF







CHAPTER 10: AILERONS FLAPS - Lancair

BID AILERON attach 17 After the ribs have cured, fit the lower aileron skin into position per cross sectional views on blueprint "E" Swing the aileron up and down to check the alignment to the lower wing skin By adjusting the aileron skin fwd or aft slightly, the gap uniformity can be established NOTE: The gap should be no more than 1/16"



Aileron-Rudder Mixing Explained - R/C Flight School

aileron deflections that is especially pronounced on flat-bottomwingairplanes A rudder deflection in the same direction as the aileron prevents the nose from yawing in the opposite direction during aileron deflections, thereby keepingbanksandrollsaxial coordinated Increased drag on the lifting wing drags the wing rearward, causing the nose to



Chapter 6 Flight Controls

Aileron deflected down Differential aileron Differential ailerons the drag created by the lowered aileron on the opposite wing and reduces adverse yaw [Figure 6-7] The frise-type aileron also forms a slot so air flows smoothly over the lowered aileron, making it more effective at high angles of attack Frise-type ailerons may also be designed



WIND TUNNEL TESTS OF THE GA (W)-2 AIRFOIL WIH 20% AILERON, 25

The 20 chord aileron is designed with a 0 5 leading- edge clearance gap Earlier tests (Ref 5) have shown that a gap this size has little effect on aileron performance The 25 slotted flap design is used with an airfoil forward section terminating at 87 5 chord The 30 Fowler flap is



THE OLYMPIA HINGE The AILERON - Sugatsune

Jan 20, 2020 · the Aileron soft-opening system The AILERON System Featuring a 5-speed adjustable soft close The first Sugatsune concealed hinge ever built with Lapcon technology



The Spangenberg Aileron Linkage - RCSCALEBUILDERCOM

Aileron hinging is conventional, typically Robart Hinge Points Install a hinge close to the Spangenberg linkage to minimize bending of the aileron while under stress If Robart Hinge Sockets are used, the aileron is easily removable To see a demonstration of the Spangenberg system, go to www mnbigbirds com, click on Andersen



‘Wings & Ailerons’ - Challenger

Inboard end of aileron should be 1 1/2” from inboard end of wing spar 4 Make sure hinges do not interfere with wing rib stay pockets on sailcloth wings or with aileron ribs Loosen clamps and move in necessary 5 When happy with hinge locations and aileron travel, drill wing spar and aileron spar through predrilled holes in hinges 6



1606 Principles of Automatic Control, Lecture 5

The transfer function from aileron input (δ a) to roll angle (φ) is given by Φ k psq“ δ a spτs ` 1q where k “ steady roll-rate per unit of aileron deflection τ “ roll subsidence time constant I “ ´M φ9 Suppose δ a is measured in of full deflection, so δ a “ 1 is full right aileron, δ a “´1 if full left one

[PDF] vitesse d'une fusée dans l'espace

[PDF] code iata aeroport internationaux pdf

[PDF] code iata pays amadeus

[PDF] code iata ville

[PDF] codes aéroports internationaux

[PDF] code des villes du monde

[PDF] code iso villes

[PDF] code iata pdf

[PDF] code iata maroc

[PDF] direction régionale des douanes casablanca

[PDF] telephone douane maroc

[PDF] douane tanger med contact

[PDF] douane tanger telephone

[PDF] administration des douanes et impôts indirects maroc

[PDF] douane casa port

U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service

WIND TUNNEL TESTS OF THE GA (W)-2

AIRFOIL WIH 20% AILERON, 25% SLOTTED FLAP,

30% FOWLER FLAP, AND 10% SLOT-LIP SPOILER

WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY

WICHITA, KS

AUG 76

AR 76-2 Aeronautical Report 76-2

Wind Tunnel Tests of the GA(W)-2

Airfoil with 20% Aileron, 25% Slotted Flap,

30% Fowler Flap, and 10% Slot-Lip Spoiler

by

W. H. Wentz, Jr.

(NASA-CR-145139) WIYD TOTINEL TESTS OP THE N79-100 2 1

GA(P)-2 AIRFOIL WITH 20% AILERON, 25%

SLOTTED FLAP, 30% FOWLER FLAP AND 10%

SLOT-LIP SPOILER (Wichita State Unir.) 75 p Unc las

HC A04/tlIP A01

Report of Research Conducted Under NASA Grant NSG 1165

Prepared

by

Wichita State University

CSCL 01A 63/02 35694

___--- - - -- L - - - - - - .

Wichita, Kansas

for

NASA Langley Research Center

August

1976

WRODUCfD BY

NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFO

R M AT I ON S ER VICE

us mawmi i mutnct &RMCllttD. \A 22161

4 Tire Wd Subtitle

WIND TUNNEL TESTS OF THE GA(W)-2 AIRFOIL WITH 20"; AILERON, 25': Slotted Flap, 30% Fowler Flap and 10%

Slot-Lip Spoiler

W. H. Wentz, Jr.

7 Ab:horlsi

Wichita State University

Wichita,

KS 67208

12 Sponsor,ng Agency Yame and Address

National Aeronautics & Space Administration

Washington,

DC 20546

Langley

Monitqr: Robert J. McGhee

15 LcCte~e-ldry Nio:cS

3. Recipient's Catalog No.

5. Repon Oete

Januarv 1977

6. Performing Orpanization Code

8 Performtng Organoation Report No

AR 76-2

10 Work Unit No.

505-06-33-1 0

11 Contract or Grant No

NSG-1165

13 Type of Repon and Period Cavefed

Contractor Report

14 7:torwving 4gency Code

:6 Ahi*a:l Tw3-dimensicnal wind tunnel tests have been conducted for the GA(W)-2 airfoil section with: spoiler.

Number

of 0.13. the slotted and Fowler flap configurations. obtained by integration of surface pressure measurevents.

20@! aileron, 25'; slotted flap; 30" Fowler flap and 10'1 slot-lip

All tests were conducted at a Reynolds number of 2.2 x lo6 and a Mach In addition to force measurements, tuft studies were conducted for

Aileron

and Spoiler hinge moments were

Tests results show

that a chax value of 3.82 was obtained with 30% Fowler flap. Aileron control effectiveness and hinge moments are similar to other airfoil

The slot-lip spoiler provides powerful, positive

roll control at all flap settings.

I! Kek Words (Sugges:ed by Autborls))

Airfoil , aileron, flap, spoiler Two-dimensional force measurements

Flow visualization

Optimized

s 1 o t geometry

Unclassified

I Uncl as si f i ed I

For Sale by Industrial Applications Centers

4

INTRODUCTION

As part of NPSA's recent program for developing new air- foil sections for general aviation applications (Ref. 1) , Wichita

State University

is conducting flap and control surface research for the new airfoils. This report documents two-dimensional wind tunnel tests of the GA(W)-2 airfoil section with: (a) 20% chord aileron; (b) 25% chord slotted flap, (c) 30% chord Fowler flap; and (a) 10% chord slot-lip spoiler. A11 experimental tests reported herein were conducted in the Walter Beech hlemorial Wind Tunnel at Wichita State Univer- sity. High Reynolds number tests of the GP(W)-2 airfoil have been reported in reference 2.

SYMBOLS

The force and moplent data have been referred to the .25c location on the flap-nested airfoil. Dimensicnal quantities are given in both International (SI) Units and U.S. Customary

Units. Measurements

were made in U.S. Customary Units. Con- version factors between the various units may be found in ref- erence

3. The symbols used in the present re?,ort are defined

as follows:

C Airfoil reference chord (flap-nested)

C Airfoil fomard section chord

a 'd Airfoil section drag coefficient, section drag/ (dynamic pressure x chord)

Flap chord Cf

2 C Control surface morent coefficient about hingeline section moment/(dynamic pressure x reference chord

C Airfoil section lift coefficient, section lift/

(dynamic pressure x chord) 1 I * Lift coefficient based upon airfoil plus flap chcr2, 7, (Ca + Cf)/C) C Airfoil section pitching moren'l coefficient with re- m spect to the .25c locaticn, section monent/(dynanic pressure x chord21

Coefficient

of pressure, (p-p,) /dynamic pressure P C h Spoiler projection heiuht normal to local contour

P Pres sure

X Coordinate parallel to airfoil chord

Z Coordinate normal to airfoil chord

ry Angle of attack, degrees

A Increment

6 Rotation of surface from nested positj.cn, deqress.

Subscripts:

a Ai le ron € Flap max Maximum n Nose

P Pivot

S Spoiler

m Free stream condition

APPARATUS AND TEST PETHODS

Model Description

The GA(W)-2 airfoil section

is a 139 maximum thickness section derived from the

17% thick GA(W)-1 section (Ref. 4).

For tests in the WSU two-dirensional facility, the models are sized with 91.4 cm (36 inch) span and 61.0 cm (24 inch) chord. 2 The forward 70% of the airfoil was fabricated from laminated mahogany bonded to a 2.5 cm x 34.8 cm (1 inch x 13.7 inch) aluminum spar. Trailing edge sections were fabricated from solid aluminum for each trailing edge device. Configuration geometric details are given in figure 1. The 20% chord aileron is designed with a 0.5% leading- edge clearance gap. Earlier tests (Ref. 5) have shown that a gap this size has little effect on aileron performance. The 25% slotted flap design is used with an airfoil forward section terminating at 87.5% chord. The 30% Fowler flap is fitted with an airfoil forward section which extends to the full

100% chord location. The 10% spoiler is arranged in a

slot-lip configuration with the

25% slotted flap.

All models are equipped with 1.07 mm (.(I42 inch) diameter pressure taps for pressure distribution surveys. Flap and aile- ron positioning is provided throuqh a set of guide rails mounted on the outside of the end plate disks (external to the test sec- tion). Test models are attached to the tunnel main balance sys- tem through a set of 1.07 m (42 inch) diameter aluminum end plate disks. Yodel pivot location is the airfoil 50% chord station.

The end plates are fitted with foam seals around

the circumference. The seals are carefully adjusted during static calibration to avoid interference friction forces.

Instrumentation

The tunnel

is equipped with an automated data system which converts analog force and pressure transducer output signals to digital fcrm, and records the data on punched cards. Force measurements are made using a pyranidal balance.

Computation

work is done through the University Digital COF- puting Center. 3

Test Procedure

Lift, drag and pitchinq mon'ent data

are obtained from direct force measurements. For each airfoil section to be tested, a wake survey is conducted with a traversinq 5-tube probe (Ref.

6) to obtain section total drag coefficient as a

function of lift coefficient. The difference between the wake survey drag and the balance force measured drag is end platequotesdbs_dbs13.pdfusesText_19