Comparative law exam questions

It proposes one method for understanding, evaluating and studying comparative law:

Comparative law is not a legal text or body of rules, it is more of a method.
Thus, German and French lawyers use terms like ‘rechtsver-gleichung’ and ‘droit compare’ which means law compare and thus seems to be more appropriate for the subject.
It is not a separate branch of law but just a method to analyze different versions of the law.

Comparative questions are an essential part of English grammar that allow us to compare two or more things or ideas.
These grammar-based discussion topics are commonly used in everyday conversations, making them a crucial topic for English language learners to master in order to improve their overall level and fluency.

Comparative legal research is used to ensure that the law enforcement officers strictly conformed to the law while securing the confession.
The law enforcement officers cannot use illegally obtained confessions and evidence against the defendant.
Moreover, the police are restricted from conducting unreasonable searches without probable cause.

Their model is a ‘synthesis of the previous literature’ (MarkVan Hoecke & Mark Warrington, Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine:Towards a New Model for Comparative Law), being founded on a concept whichencompasses both internal and external factors

Comparative lawyers have been described by some in the field (usually by critical comparatists) as falling into two broad camps: (i) the “mainstream,” or those who adopt a formalist, legal positivist notion of legal validity and strive for neutrality and objectivity; and (ii) “critical” comparatists

The questioning of comparative law raises more originary questions about comparison itself

This Article is merely a starting point to show the reader that we are in comparison but not yet asking the question of comparison

Not yet asking the question of comparison does not mean that no one has ever thought about or questioned comparison