[PDF] communication skills - University of Ibadan Institutional Repository
The Union leaders serve as the mouthpiece for staff members and feedback channel for the management The semi vertical communication flow is a product of the
ui inbk ojebuyi concept
[PDF] TYPES OF COMMUNICATION IN ORGANIZATION
Communication Vertical Horizontal Diagonal and grapevine Communication • Prepared by: Prof methods are used like the movement of body organs
[PDF] Chapter 17 VARIOUS COMMUNICATION MODALITIES IN
Communication flows (vertical horizontal and diagonal) communication skills between individuals and indeed between all the members of the
RadovicMarkovic
[PDF] PROCESS OF COMMUNICATION AND ITS TYPES
The communication process is a guide toward realizing METHODS OF COMMUNICATION Conflict may arise when vertical communication
Types of Communication
[PDF] Communication Skills - MCRHRDI
Vertical Communication * Downward Communication * Upward Communication ❖ Network Patterns * Centralized Network * Decentralized Network
Communication Skills
[PDF] 1 ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN THE EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT
interaction variety in routine or tedious jobs and informal methods of work Semi-Vertical or Quasi-Vertical Communication is adopted due to certain
ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN THE EFFICIENT
[PDF] 4 COMMUNICATION SKILLS - New Horizon Educational Institutions
ADVANTAGES OF VERTICAL COMMUNICATION • Conveying message of subordinate: • Maintains good labor-management relations: • Maintains organizational discipline
CHAPTER PRCC
330Chapter17
VARIOUSCOMMUNICATIONMODALITIESINORGANIZATIONSWITH
FOCUSONVIRTUALFIRMS
DušanMarković,MirjanaRadovićFigure1.
Globalizationrequirementsfacingvirtualfirmsundernewandchanging businessconditions(Radović17.2Theoreticalbackground
Communicationscanbeviewedasconsistingofthreedimensions:technical, contextual,andcontractual.Thetechnicalviewisbasedontheinformationtheory. Shannon, Claude E., & Warren Weaver (1949) defined communication as a mechanicalinformationtransmittingsystem(seefigure2).Figure2.
CommunicationasaShannonandWeavermechanicalsystem(1949) TheShanonandWeaversystemtransmitsinformationfromthesourcetothe destinationwithminimumdistortionanderror.Theimplementationofamechanic approachtocommunicationsisidenticaltoday.Thistechnicalviewofcommunication persists as a common basis for the discussion about communicationin any organization. The contextual approach to communication does not focus only on the contents (e.g., the accuracy of exchanged information or the adequacy of the conveyedmeaning).Thisinformationtheoryapproachhasabroadercommunication contextasitfocusesonboththeverbalcontentsandthenon#verbalsignals.Further, thecontextualapproachtakesintoconsiderationtherelationshipsbetweenthesender andtherecipientwithinsocial,organizationalandculturalexplanations.Forexample, conversation analysis observes the entire communication process including formal andinformalcommunicationandanytypeofverbalandwrittencommunication.The goalofsuchananalysisistoestablishrelationshipsbetweenamodelofconversation andamodelofsocialrelationships.Suchananalysiscanhelpexplainhowsocial relationshipsarecreatedandmaintainedthroughconversation(Mening,1992;Pirs,1994,1995;andCronen,1991,1995).Theorganizationcanusetheanalysistodefine,
shape,determineandmarktheboundariesofactualcommunicationprocesses. Lazega(1992)studiedthemannerinwhichthecontextofconversationisself# adBusting,ratherthanthemannerinwhichconversationcreateandmaintainsocial relationships.Theassessmentofappropriatenessofinformationandtheknowledgeof technically satisfactory requirements are crucial in virtual organizations. The contextual approach is employed in elaborating and understanding the interactive332componentsoffeedbackinformation.Theexchangeoffeedbackinformationcanbe
viewedasaprocessofconversationamongpeople.17.3Differentaspectsofcommunication
The communication in the organization can be observed in several different dimensions:1.Communicationlevels
2.Formalandinformalcommunication
3.Communicationflows(vertical,horizontalanddiagonal)
4.Internalandexternalcommunication
•Communicationlevels Communicationcanbecategorizedintothefollowinglevels: a)Communicationbetweenindividuals b)Communicationatthegrouplevel c)Communicationattheorganizationallevel d)Inter#organizationalcommunication e)Masscommunication Researchsupportstheconclusionthatfrequencyofcommunicationoccurmainly at lower levels between individuals. Thus the initial attention in communication researchinorganizationsfocusesonthecommunicationbetweenindividuals(e.g.the managers) in their speech and writings. As organizations over time became increasinglydependentoncommunication,moreattentionwaspaidtoimprovethe communicationskillsbetweenindividualsandindeedbetweenallthemembers ofthe organization (RogersandRoethlisberger,1952,Argiris,1986,Kiesler,1986). •Modalitiesofcommunicationbetweenindividuals # Sendingandreceivingmessages # Verbal,inwritingprimarilythroughelectronicmessaging. Overtime communicationstudieswithinorganizationsfocusesincreasinglyon higherlevelcommunicationsatthegrouplevel,attheorganizationallevelandinter# organizational communication. Shifting from lower level to higher level communicationsresultsinmessagesthatcanbefurtherdifferentiatedsuchasformal, informal,vertical,horizontal,diagonal(aswellasinternalmessagingasrelatedto externalcommunication). •Formalvs.informalcommunication In the past communication studies focused mainly on formal top#down communications. Informal communication refers to communication between 333individualsalsocalledhorizontalcommunicationthatinthepastwasviewedasa likely obstacle to efficient organizational performance. However, that view is no longeracceptedasinmodernsocietydynamicandinformalmessagingalongwith formalcommunicationisnecessarytoensurethattheBobisdoneefficiently(D'Aprix
1996).
•Vertical,horizontalanddiagonalcommunicationVertical
communication. Vertical communication is between hierarchically positionedindividualsandmayincludebottom#upaswellastop#downinformation flows.Asmightbeexpectedthetop#downinformationflowoccursmorefrequently. LarkinandLarkin(1994)notedthatthetop#downinformationflowismosteffective ifmanagerscommunicatedirectlywithimmediatesupervisors,andthesupervisorsin turn communicate directly with their staff. Such direct communication results in improvedsatisfactionandperformancesamongemployees.Sincethiswasfirstnoted byDonaldPelz(1952)itiscalledthePelzeffect.Horizontal
communication.Horizontalcommunicationreferstocommunication betweenindividualsnotinahierarchicalrelationship.Communicationhorizontally contributestoahighlevelofsatisfactionamongthehumanresourcemanagers(Frank,1984).Thecurrenthorizontaltendenciesareprimarilycommunicationbetweenthe
team members focussing on team assembling and team work. Horizontal communicationbetweenthedislocatedworkersandgeographicallydispersedwork groupsengaginginsimilartypesofBobisorientedtowardslearningandknowledge exchange.Diagonal
communication. Diagonal communication is communication between managers and employees in different functional divisions (Wilson, 1992). While verticalandthehorizontalcommunicationcontinueinmodernorganizations,theydo notentirelyreflectthecommunicationneedsandflowsinamaBorityoforganizations. The concept of diagonal communication is introduced to describe otherforms of330Chapter17
VARIOUSCOMMUNICATIONMODALITIESINORGANIZATIONSWITH
FOCUSONVIRTUALFIRMS
DušanMarković,MirjanaRadovićFigure1.
Globalizationrequirementsfacingvirtualfirmsundernewandchanging businessconditions(Radović17.2Theoreticalbackground
Communicationscanbeviewedasconsistingofthreedimensions:technical, contextual,andcontractual.Thetechnicalviewisbasedontheinformationtheory. Shannon, Claude E., & Warren Weaver (1949) defined communication as a mechanicalinformationtransmittingsystem(seefigure2).Figure2.
CommunicationasaShannonandWeavermechanicalsystem(1949) TheShanonandWeaversystemtransmitsinformationfromthesourcetothe destinationwithminimumdistortionanderror.Theimplementationofamechanic approachtocommunicationsisidenticaltoday.Thistechnicalviewofcommunication persists as a common basis for the discussion about communicationin any organization. The contextual approach to communication does not focus only on the contents (e.g., the accuracy of exchanged information or the adequacy of the conveyedmeaning).Thisinformationtheoryapproachhasabroadercommunication contextasitfocusesonboththeverbalcontentsandthenon#verbalsignals.Further, thecontextualapproachtakesintoconsiderationtherelationshipsbetweenthesender andtherecipientwithinsocial,organizationalandculturalexplanations.Forexample, conversation analysis observes the entire communication process including formal andinformalcommunicationandanytypeofverbalandwrittencommunication.The goalofsuchananalysisistoestablishrelationshipsbetweenamodelofconversation andamodelofsocialrelationships.Suchananalysiscanhelpexplainhowsocial relationshipsarecreatedandmaintainedthroughconversation(Mening,1992;Pirs,1994,1995;andCronen,1991,1995).Theorganizationcanusetheanalysistodefine,
shape,determineandmarktheboundariesofactualcommunicationprocesses. Lazega(1992)studiedthemannerinwhichthecontextofconversationisself# adBusting,ratherthanthemannerinwhichconversationcreateandmaintainsocial relationships.Theassessmentofappropriatenessofinformationandtheknowledgeof technically satisfactory requirements are crucial in virtual organizations. The contextual approach is employed in elaborating and understanding the interactive332componentsoffeedbackinformation.Theexchangeoffeedbackinformationcanbe
viewedasaprocessofconversationamongpeople.17.3Differentaspectsofcommunication
The communication in the organization can be observed in several different dimensions:1.Communicationlevels
2.Formalandinformalcommunication
3.Communicationflows(vertical,horizontalanddiagonal)
4.Internalandexternalcommunication
•Communicationlevels Communicationcanbecategorizedintothefollowinglevels: a)Communicationbetweenindividuals b)Communicationatthegrouplevel c)Communicationattheorganizationallevel d)Inter#organizationalcommunication e)Masscommunication Researchsupportstheconclusionthatfrequencyofcommunicationoccurmainly at lower levels between individuals. Thus the initial attention in communication researchinorganizationsfocusesonthecommunicationbetweenindividuals(e.g.the managers) in their speech and writings. As organizations over time became increasinglydependentoncommunication,moreattentionwaspaidtoimprovethe communicationskillsbetweenindividualsandindeedbetweenallthemembers ofthe organization (RogersandRoethlisberger,1952,Argiris,1986,Kiesler,1986). •Modalitiesofcommunicationbetweenindividuals # Sendingandreceivingmessages # Verbal,inwritingprimarilythroughelectronicmessaging. Overtime communicationstudieswithinorganizationsfocusesincreasinglyon higherlevelcommunicationsatthegrouplevel,attheorganizationallevelandinter# organizational communication. Shifting from lower level to higher level communicationsresultsinmessagesthatcanbefurtherdifferentiatedsuchasformal, informal,vertical,horizontal,diagonal(aswellasinternalmessagingasrelatedto externalcommunication). •Formalvs.informalcommunication In the past communication studies focused mainly on formal top#down communications. Informal communication refers to communication between 333individualsalsocalledhorizontalcommunicationthatinthepastwasviewedasa likely obstacle to efficient organizational performance. However, that view is no longeracceptedasinmodernsocietydynamicandinformalmessagingalongwith formalcommunicationisnecessarytoensurethattheBobisdoneefficiently(D'Aprix
1996).
•Vertical,horizontalanddiagonalcommunicationVertical
communication. Vertical communication is between hierarchically positionedindividualsandmayincludebottom#upaswellastop#downinformation flows.Asmightbeexpectedthetop#downinformationflowoccursmorefrequently. LarkinandLarkin(1994)notedthatthetop#downinformationflowismosteffective ifmanagerscommunicatedirectlywithimmediatesupervisors,andthesupervisorsin turn communicate directly with their staff. Such direct communication results in improvedsatisfactionandperformancesamongemployees.Sincethiswasfirstnoted byDonaldPelz(1952)itiscalledthePelzeffect.Horizontal
communication.Horizontalcommunicationreferstocommunication betweenindividualsnotinahierarchicalrelationship.Communicationhorizontally contributestoahighlevelofsatisfactionamongthehumanresourcemanagers(Frank,1984).Thecurrenthorizontaltendenciesareprimarilycommunicationbetweenthe
team members focussing on team assembling and team work. Horizontal communicationbetweenthedislocatedworkersandgeographicallydispersedwork groupsengaginginsimilartypesofBobisorientedtowardslearningandknowledge exchange.Diagonal
communication. Diagonal communication is communication between managers and employees in different functional divisions (Wilson, 1992). While verticalandthehorizontalcommunicationcontinueinmodernorganizations,theydo notentirelyreflectthecommunicationneedsandflowsinamaBorityoforganizations. The concept of diagonal communication is introduced to describe otherforms of- vertical communication skills
- vertical bloc
- vertical combat
- vertical challenge
- vertical formation
- vertical film
- vertical team
- vertical grenoble
- vertical inbound
- vertical innovation
- vertical align text in div
- vertical media
- communication verticale horizontale
- techniques verticales
- vertical project média
- vertical media project
- vertical project
- vertical project media
- vertical rh
- techniques verticales reunion
- vertical response
- near vertical incidence skywave communication theory techniques and validation
- communication vertical
- vertical chamonix
- communication verticale définition
- exercices corrigés de techniques de communication pdf
- exercices communication verbale pdf
- exercice communication verbale
- exercice sur les techniques de communication