[PDF] A modified Galerkin/finite element method for the numerical solution





Previous PDF Next PDF



2 The (Galerkin) Finite Element Method

Quadratic and cubic elements will be considered later. 2.3.1 A Single-Element Example. Consider the following problem: solve the following differential equation 



The Galerkin Finite Element Method

21 juil. 2010 Outline of Remainder of Lectures. • Galerkin method. • C1 finite elements. • Examples. • Split implicit time differencing. Today. Tomorrow.



Finite Element Methods for 1D Boundary Value Problems

using the Galerkin finite element method described in the following steps. example suppose we seek the equilibrium position of an elastic string of ...



Chapter 2 One-Dimensional Finite Element Methods

2 mai 2020 The piecewise-linear Galerkin finite element method of Chapter 1 can be extended in ... in L2 for the example of Section 1.3.



A SIMPLE TUTORIAL ON DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS

Discontinuous Galerkin methods are those finite element methods which Example: continuous Galerkin. Weak formulation ... Example: discontinuous Galerkin.



Galerkin Approximations and Finite Element Methods

Examples of problems like (1.6) are given by the variational formulation of differential equations. Example 1.2.1 Scalar linear elliptic equations of second 



A modified Galerkin/finite element method for the numerical solution

20 sept. 2016 Similar techniques that reduce the requirement of high-order finite elements (for example the use of cubic splines) have been used previously ...



The Runge-Kutta Local Projection Discontinuous Galerkin Finite

and numerical examples (showing the good performance of the methods for k = 1 2



FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

structural analysis we shall begin our discussion of finite element concept by considering a simple example form this area. 2.2 Linear Spring System.



An Introduction to the Finite Element Method (FEM) for Differential

2 avr. 2016 2.3 Galerkin finite element method for (2.1.1) . ... for example for the hear equation ?u ? u// = 0

A modified Galerkin/finite element method for the numerical solution

A MODIFIED GALERKIN / FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR

THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE

SERRE-GREEN-NAGHDI SYSTEM

DIMITRIOS MITSOTAKIS, COSTAS SYNOLAKIS, AND MARK MCGUINNESS Abstract.A new modified Galerkin / Finite Element Method is proposed for the numerical solution of the fully nonlinear shallow water wave equa- tions. The new numerical method allows the use of low-order Lagrange finite element spaces, despite the fact that the system contains third order spatial partial derivatives for the depth averaged velocity of the fluid. After studying the efficacy and the conservation properties of the new numerical method, we proceed with the validation of the new numerical model and boundary condi- tions by comparing the numerical solutions with laboratoryexperiments and with available theoretical asymptotic results.

1.Introduction

The motion of an ideal (inviscid, irrotational) fluid bounded above by afree surface and below by an impermeable bottom is governed by the full Euler equations of water wave theory, [63]. Because of the complexity of the Euler equations, a number of simplified models describing inviscid fluid flow have been derived such as various Boussinesq type (BT) models. The Serre-Green-Naghdi (SGN) system can be considered to be a BT model that approximates the Euler equations, and models one-dimensional, two-way propagation of long waves, without any restrictive conditions on the wave height. The SGN system is a fully non-linear system of the form, h t+ (hu)x= 0,(1a)?h+Thb?ut+gh(h+b)x+huux+Qhu+Qhbu= 0,(1b) where h(x,t).=η(x,t)-b(x),(1c) is the total depth of the water between the bottomb(x) and the free surface elevation η(x,t),u(x,t) is the depth averaged horizontal velocity of the fluid, andgthe acceleration due to gravity. The operatorsThb,QhandQhbdepend onh, and are defined as follows: T hbw=h? h xbx+1

2hbxx+b2x?

w-13?h3wx? x,(1d) Q hw=-1

3?h3(wwxx-w2x)?

x,(1e)

2010Mathematics Subject Classification.76B15, 76B25, 65M08.

Key words and phrases.Finite element methods, Solitary waves, Green-Naghdi system, Serre equations. 1

2 DIMITRIOS MITSOTAKIS, COSTAS SYNOLAKIS, AND MARK MCGUINNESS

Q h bw=1

2?h2(w2bxx+wwxbx)?

x-12h2?wwxx-w2x?bx+hw2bxbxx+hwwxb2x. (1f) In dimensional and unscaled form, the independent variable,x?Ris a spatial variable andt≥0 represents the time. The SGN equations as derived by Seabra-Santoset.al.in [50] have also been derived in a three-dimensional form in [36] and in a different formulation by Green and Naghdi [27]. In the case of a flat bottom (i.e.bx= 0) (1) is simplified to the so-called Serre system of equations derived first by Serre [51, 52]and re-derived later by Su and Gardner, [55]. For these reasons the equations (1)are also known as the Serre, or Green-Nagdhi, or Su and Gardner equations. We will henceforth refer to them here as the Serre-Green-Naghdi (SGN) equations. Under the additional assumption of small amplitude waves (i.e. the solutions are of small amplitude), the SGN system reduces to the Peregrine system, [47]: h t+ (hu)x= 0,(2a) u t+g(h+b)x+uux-b

2[bu]xxt-b26uxxt= 0.(2b)

Peregrine"s system belongs to the weakly dispersive and weakly nonlinear BT sys- tems. There are also other BT systems that are asymptotically equivalent to Pere- grine"s system, cf. [43, 44]. Differences between the SGN equationsand BT models are explained in [19]. In the same work the inclusion of surface tensioneffects have been included and explained in detail. Although equations (2) can be derived from the SGN system, their solutions have different properties. For example the solutions of the SGN equations are invariant under the Galilean boost, while the respective solutions of (2) are not. It is noted that the SGN equations have a Hamiltonian formulation, [39, 31]. Specifically, for a stationary bathymetry the SGN system conserves the total energy functional [31]:

I(t) =?

R gη2+hu2+Thbu·u dx ,(3) in the sense thatI(t) =I(0), for allt >0. The conservation of this Hamiltonian will be used to measure accuracy and conservation properties of theproposed numerical methods. Although both systems are known to admit solitary wave solutions propagating without change in their shape over a horizontal bottomy=-b0, only the solitary waves of the SGN system have known formulas in a closed form. Specifically, a solitary wave of the SGN system with amplitudeAcan be written in the form: h s(x,t) =b0+Asech2[λ(x-cst)], us(x,t) =c0? 1-b0 h(x,t)?quotesdbs_dbs2.pdfusesText_3
[PDF] galois theory book

[PDF] galois theory lectures

[PDF] gamma function

[PDF] gamma word mac

[PDF] gaps in the fitness industry

[PDF] garage paris nord moto aulnay sous bois

[PDF] garage paris ouest automobile bezons

[PDF] gare du nord station to eiffel tower

[PDF] gate pass cancellation letter

[PDF] gate pass entry request letter

[PDF] gate pass missing letter

[PDF] gazelec ajaccio vs paris prediction

[PDF] gbspx eurostar

[PDF] gce cambridge

[PDF] gcse english worksheets pdf