[PDF] THE DEFICIT IN THE GAUSSIAN LOG-SOBOLEV INEQUALITY





Previous PDF Next PDF



Elementary Functions The logarithm as an inverse function

Since g(x) = logb x is the inverse function of f(x) the domain of the log function will be the range of the exponential function and vice versa. So the domain 



THE DEFICIT IN THE GAUSSIAN LOG-SOBOLEV INEQUALITY

27 mars 2021 We establish dual equivalent forms involving relative entropy Fisher information and optimal transport costs of inverse Santaló inequalities.



Inverse Log-Gamma-G processes

Following the ideas about G-classes of distributions and making transformations of random processes we define Inverse. Log-Gamma-G processes. The relation with 



Tests du Log-rank ajusté : étude de simulations

Courbes de survie ajustées utilisant la méthode IPTW (Inverse. Probability of Treatment Weighting) basée sur les scores de propension. 2 / 16. Page 3 



Actuariat de lAssurance Non-Vie # 7 A. Charpentier (Université de

Arthur Charpentier ENSAE - Actuariat Assurace Non Vie - 2017. Les régressions Gamma



3.3 The logarithm as an inverse function

3.3.1 The meaning of the logarithm. The logarithmic function g(x) = logb(x) is the inverse of an exponential function f(x) = bx. and so the.



Explicit Strong LTCs with Inverse Poly-Log Rate and Constant

ACM 2006) asked about the existence of strong LTCs with constant query complexity constant relative distance



Functional affine-isoperimetry and an inverse logarithmic Sobolev

We give a functional version of the affine isoperimetric inequality for log-concave functions which may be interpreted as an inverse form of a logarithmic 



The exponential function (Sect. 7.3) The inverse of the logarithm

? Derivatives and integrals. ? Algebraic properties. The inverse of the logarithm. Remark: The natural logarithm ln : (0?) 



Modèles de régression non linéaires: Éléments de Théorie et

29 juin 2019 Modèles log-inverse ou log-hyperbole ou log-réciproque. C'est des modèles à la fois réciproque et semi-log où la variable dépendante est prise ...

THE DEFICIT IN THE GAUSSIAN LOG-SOBOLEV INEQUALITY AND

INVERSE SANTAL

´O INEQUALITIES

NATHAEL GOZLAN

Abstract.We establish dual equivalent forms involving relative entropy, Fisher information and optimal transport costs of inverse Santal´o inequalities.We show in particular that the Mahler conjecture is equivalent to some dimensional lower bound onthe deficit in the Gaussian logarithmic

Sobolev inequality. We also derive from existing results oninverse Santal´o inequalities some sharp

lower bounds on the deficit in the Gaussian logarithmic Sobolev inequality. Our proofs rely on duality relations between convex functionals (introducedin [16] and [62]) related to the notion of moment measure.

1.Introduction

The aim of this paper is to highlight some new connections between reverse forms of the Santal´o inequality and some improved versions of the Gaussian logarithmic Sobolev inequality. In particular, the celebrated Mahler conjecture is shown to be equivalent to somedimensional lower bound on the deficit in the logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the standard Gaussianmeasure. Recall the classical Santal´o inequality [61]: ifKĂRnis a convex body and K denotes its polar with respect to the pointzPRn(simply denotedKifz"0), then denotes the?punit ball ofRn.WhenKis centrally symmetric, then the infimum inPpKqis attained forz"0, and in this case, the Santal´o inequality reads as follows The Mahler conjecture [52] states reverse bounds forPpKq, which are the following: ifKis centrally symmetric, then (2) VolpKqVolpKq ěPpBn1q "VolpBn1qVolpBn8q "4n n! and for a general convex bodyK, (3)PpKq ěPpΔnq "pn`1qn`1 pn!q2

Date: March 27, 2021.

2020Mathematics Subject Classification.(MSC 2020) 49N15 ; 49Q25 ; 52A20; 52A40 ; 60E15.

Key words and phrases.Santal´o Inequality ; Mahler Conjecture ; Logarithmic Sobolev Inequality ; Moment Measures

; Optimal Transport.

The author is supported by a grant of the Simone and Cino Del Duca Foundation. This research has been conducted

within the FP2M federation (CNRS FR 2036). 1

2NATHAEL GOZLAN

where Δ nis any non-degenerate simplex ofRn. Even if these two conjectures are still open, some progresses have been made in the understanding of this problem and some particular cases have been

established. In [60], Saint-Raymond (see also [54]) showed that (2) holds true for unconditional convex

bodies, that is to say convex bodyKsatisfyingx" px1,...,xnq PKñ pε1x1,...,εnxnq PK, for

allε" pε1,...,εnq P t´1,1un.Other particular cases were established in [58, 32, 55, 5, 1]. Recently,

Conjecture (2) has been established in dimensionn"3 by Iriyeh and Shibata (see [26] for an

alternative proof). Bourgain and Milman [13] (see also [45], [56], [31] and [7] for alternative proofs)

showed that Conjecture (3) is asymptotically true: there exists some absolute constantαą0 such that for allně1 and all convex bodyKĂRn, it holds (4)PpKq ěαnPpΔnq. The Mahler conjectures admit functional equivalent versions thatwere considered in particular by Klartag and Milman [43] and by Fradelizi and Meyer [29, 28], that we shall now recall. We first need to introduce some notation and definitions that will be useful in all the paper. We will denote byFpRnqthe set of lower semi-continuous functionsf:RnÑRYt`8uwhich are convex and such thatfpxq ă `8for at least one value ofx. The domain of a convex functionfis the convex set dompfq " txPRn:fpxq ă `8u. We recall, that the Fenchel-Legendre transform offPFpRnqis the function denoted byf°and defined by (5)f°pyq "sup xPRntx¨y´fpxqu, yPRn.

A functionf:RnÑRY t`8uis said unconditional if for anyε" pε1,...,εnq P t´1,1unit holds

fpε1x1,...,εnxnq "fpx1,...,xnq,@x" px1,...,xnq PRn. We will denote byFupRnqthe set of all unconditional elements ofFpRnqand byFspRnqthe set of functionsfPFpRnqthat are symmetric:fp´xq "fpxq,xPRn. Finally, for any convex set CĂRn, we will denote byχCthe convex characteristic function ofCwhich is the function defined byχCpxq "0 ifxPCand`8otherwise. Definition 1(Functional Inverse Santal´o Inequalities).Letcą0andně1. "We will say that that the functional inverse Santal´o inequalityISnpcqholds with the constant cą0if for all functionfPFpRnqsuch that0ăşe´fdxand0ăşe´f°dx, it holds (6)ż e

´fdxż

e

´f°dxěcn.

"We will say that that thesymmetric(resp.unconditional) functional inverse Santal´o in- equalityISn,spcq(resp.ISn,upcq) holds with the constantcą0if(6)holds for all function fPFspRnq(resp.FupRnq) such that0ăşe´fdxand0ăşe´f°dx. Let us briefly recall how the functional and the convex body versions are related. LetKbe a centrally symmetric convex body and denote by}x}K"inftrě0 :xPrKu,xPRn, its gauge. Then

an easy calculation shows that} ¨ }°K"χK. Thereforeşe´}¨}°Kpxqdx"VolpKq.On the other hand,

e

´}x}Kdx"ż

`8 0 `8 0 e´uunduVolpKq "n!VolpKq.

Therefore, IS

n,sp4qimplies (2). Conversely, it is shown in [29, Proposition 1] that if (2) holds for all

ně1, then ISn,sp4qholds for allně1. Furthermore, according to [29, Proposition 1] again, ISnpeq

holds for allně1 if and only if (3) holds for allně1. Similarly, it follows from (4) that there exists

some absolute constantcą0 such that ISnpcqholds for allně1 (see [43, 28]). In addition, Fradelizi

and Meyer gave in [28, 29] a direct functional proof of the fact that ISn,up4qholds for everyně1, THE DEFICIT IN THE GAUSSIAN LOG-SOBOLEV INEQUALITY AND INVERSE SANTAL´O INEQUALITIES 3

which gives back in particular Saint-Raymond"s result. They also proved in [29] that IS1peqholds true

(see also [30]). Note that other special classes of functions are considered in [29, 28]. The goal of this paper is to study dual forms, expressed on the space of probability measures, of the functional inverse Santal´o inequality IS npcqand its variants. To state our main results, we need to introduce additional notations. We will denote byPpRnqthe set of all Borel probability measures onRn, and byPkpRnq,kě1, the subset of probability measures having a finite moment of order k. A probability measureνPPpRnqrealized by a random vectorX" pX1,...,Xnqwill be said symmetric if´Xhas the same law asXand unconditional ifpε1X1,...,εnXnqhas the same law

asXfor anyεP t´1,1un.Finally, ifν1,ν2PPkpRnq, let us denote byWkpν1,ν2qtheir Kantorovich

transport distance of orderk(also called Wasserstein distance of orderk), defined by W kkpν1,ν2q "infż |x´y|kπpdxdyq, where| ¨ |denotes the standard Euclidean norm onRnand where the infimum runs over the set of

all transport plansπbetweenν1andν2, that is to say the set of probability measuresπonRnˆRn

havingν1andν2as marginals. According to a celebrated result of Gross [35], the standard Gaussian measure npdxq "1 p2πqn{2e´|x|2 2dx onRnsatisfies the logarithmic Sobolev inequality: for allηPPpRnqabsolutely continuous with respect toγn,

2Ipη|γnq,@ηPPpRnq,

where, for any probability measure of the formdη"hdγn, the relative entropyHpη|γnqofηwith

respect toγnis defined by

Hpη|γnq "ż

loghdη.

To define the Fisher informationIp¨|γnq, we need to introduce additional material. We will say that

a functionf:RnÑRis absolutely continuous on almost every line parallel to an axis, it for every iP t1,...,nuand Lebesgue almost everypx1,...,xi´1,xi`1,...,xnq PRn´1, the function tÞÑfpx1,...,xi´1,t,xi`1,...,xnq is absolutely continuous on every segment. Whenfsatisfies this condition, its partial derivatives Bf Bxi,iP t1,...,nu, are defined Lebesgue almost everywhere. The Fisher informationIpη|γnqof a probability measuredη"hdγnwith respect toγnis then defined by

Ipη|γnq "4ż

|?ph1{2q|2dγn, wheneverh1{2is absolutely continuous on almost every line parallel to an axis, and`8otherwise.

It follows from [10, Proposition 1.5.2] and [53, Chapter 1, Theorems 1and 2], thatIpη|γnq ă 8if

and only ifh1{2PW1,2pγnq(the subspace ofL2pγnqconsisting of functionsfwhose weak derivative is also inL2pγnq), but we will not make reference to this spaceW1,2pγnqanymore in the paper. Remark 1.Ifh1{2admits partial derivatives almost everywhere, the following quantity (7)

˜Ipη|γnq "4ż

|?ph1{2q|2dγn

inequality is not always true if one replacesIp¨|γnqby˜Ip¨|γnq. Indeed, if for instancedη"1B

γnpBqdγn,

4NATHAEL GOZLAN

whereBis (say) the Euclidean unit ball, then0"˜Ipη|γnq ăIpη|γnq " `8whereas,Hpη|γnq "

´logγnpBq ą0.

The deficit in the Gaussian logarithmic Sobolev inequality is the non-negative functionδndefined by npηq "1

2Ipη|γnq ´Hpη|γnq,

for alldη"hdγn, such thatHpη|γnq ă `8. Recently, bounding from below the functionδnattracted

a lot of attention. We refer to [24, 39, 9, 18, 23, 46, 15, 11, 38, 20] and the references therein for some

recent progresses regarding this question. The following theorem, which is one of our main results, shows in particular that the Mahler conjecture is equivalent to someparticular bound onδn. Theorem 1.Letcą0andně1. The inverse functional Santal´o inequalityISnpcqholds if and only

if for all log-concave probability measuresη1,η2onRnsuch that, fori"1,2,dηi"e´Vidxfor some

essentially continuousViPFpRnq, it holds (8)Hpη1|γnq `Hpη2|γnq `1 as soon asν1,ν2PP2pRnq, where, fori"1,2,νi"?pViq#ηiis the moment probability measure of i. Equivalently npη1q `δnpη2q ě1

2W22pν1,ν2q ´nlogp2π{cq

or

2npη1bη2q ě1

2W22pν1,ν2q ´nlogp2π{cq.

The same statement holds forISn,spcq(resp.ISn,upcq) with the extra condition thatη1,η2are sym- metric (resp. unconditional). Before commenting this result, we need to clarify some notions usedin the statement above: "An absolutely continuous measurem(not necessarily finite) is said log-concaveifdm"e´Vdx for someV:RnÑRY t`8uconvex (in this paper we don"t consider log-concave measures supported on affine subspaces of dimension smaller thann). "A functionVPFpRnqis said to be essentially continuous if the set of points where it is discontinuous (as a function taking values inRYt8u) is negligible for the Hausdorff measure H n´1. Equivalently,Vis essentially continuous if lettingD"dompVq H n´1ptxP BD:Vpxq ă 8uq "0. Note in particular that in dimension 1, a functionVPFpRqis essentially continuous if and only if it is continuous as a function taking values inRY t`8u. "IfVPFpRnqis such that 0ăşe´Vă `8, the moment measure ofVis the probability measureνdefined as the push forward of the probability measuredη"e´V

şe´Vpyqdydxunder

the map?V. By extension, we also say thatνis the moment measure ofη. "As explained in Remark 5 below, if a probability measure is of the formdη"e´Vdx, with an essentially continuousVPFpRnq, then its densityhwith respect toγnis such thath1{2 is absolutely continuous on almost every line parallel to an axis. Note,for instance, that uniform distributions on convex bodies are never in this class. According to the functional version of the Bourgain-Milman theorem established in [43] and [28], the inequality IS npcqholds true for some constantcą0 independent onn. We immediately conclude from this that for the same constantcą0 it holds for allně1 (9)δ2npη1bη2q ě1

2W22pν1,ν2q ´nlogp2π{cq,

THE DEFICIT IN THE GAUSSIAN LOG-SOBOLEV INEQUALITY AND INVERSE SANTAL´O INEQUALITIES 5

wheneverη1,η2are log-concave probability measures with an essentially continuousminus log density

(andν1,ν2are the associated moment measures). In dimension 1, this result can be refined. Indeed,

as we mentioned above, Fradelizi and Meyer [29] proved that IS

1peqholds true. We thus derive from

their result that (9) holds true forn"1 andc"e. The following result shows that this bound onδ2 is sharp:

Corollary 1.For all log-concave probability measuresη1,η2onRsuch that, fori"1,2,dηi"e´Vidx

for some continuous convex functionVi:RÑRY t`8u, it holds

2pη1bη2q ě1

2W22pν1,ν2q ´logp2π{eq,

where, fori"1,2,νi"?pViq#ηiis the moment probability measure ofηi. This bound is equivalent

to the functional inverse Santal´o inequalityIS1peq. Moreover, there exist sequences of log-concave

probability measurespηk1qkě1andpηk2qkě1with continuous densities as above (and with associated

moment measures denoted byνk1,νk2,kě1) such that

2pηk1bηk2q ´1

2W22pνk1,νk2q `logp2π{eq Ñ0

askÑ 8.

The sequencespηk1qkě1andpηk2qkě1are approximations in the class of log-concave measures with

a continuous density of the following two probability measures τpdxq "e´p1`xq1r´1,`8rpxqdxand ¯τpdxq "ex´11s´8,1spxqdx whose minus log densities realize equality in IS

1peq, and are up to affine transformations the only

cases of equality, as observed by Fradelizi and Meyer [29]. In particular, as the proof of Corollary 1

will reveal, there is no equality cases in the logarithmic Sobolev formulation of the inverse Santal´o

inequality. This point will be further commented in Section 3.3.

In a similar way, since IS

n,up4qholds for everyně1, the following result follows by choosing

2"τbns, where

spdxq "1

2e´|x|dx

denotes the symmetric exponential distribution onR. For everyně1, letCnĂRnbe the unit discrete cubeCn" t´1,1unand denote byλCnthe uniform probability measure onCn. Theorem 2.For any log-concave and unconditional probability measureηonRnwithdη"e´Vdx whereV:RnÑRY t`8uis an essentially continuous convex function, it holds

Hpη|γnq `1

`12Ipη|γnq, whereν"?V#ηis the moment probability measure ofη. In other words, for suchη, npηq ě1

2W22pν,λCnq ´n2log´πe2¯

Moreover, there exists a sequence of product measurespηbn kqkě1such that npηbn kq ´1

2W22`νbn

k,λCn`n2log´πe2¯

Ñ0,

askÑ 8, where forkě1,νbn kdenotes the moment measure ofηbn k. This time the sequencepηkqkě1is an approximation in the class of log-concave measures with a continuous density of the uniform measure onr´1,1s. Note that Theorem 2 provides a new sharp di-

mensional lower bound on the deficitδnon the class of unconditional log-concave probability measures

with a regular density.

6NATHAEL GOZLAN

Let us now give a flavor of the proof of Theorem 1 (in the case of IS npcq, the other variants being similar). To prove Theorem 1, we will establish as an intermediate stepthat the reverse Santal´o inequality IS npcqholds if and only if for allν1,ν2PP2pRnq, (10) inf

1PP2pRnqtTpν1,η1q `Hpη1|Lebqu `infη

whereHp¨|Lebqdenotes (minus) the Shannon entropy functional defined for alldη"hdxby

Hpη|Lebq "ż

loghdη

as soon as the integral makes sense, and whereTp¨,¨qis the so-called maximal correlation transport

cost defined as follows: for allν1,ν2PP2pRnq,

Tpν1,ν2q "sup

X"ν1,Y"ν2ErX¨Ys.

The proof of the equivalence between (10) and IS

npcqfollows by adapting an argument of Bobkov and G¨otze [8] showing equivalence between transport-entropy inequalities and infimum convolution

inequalities (see also [33, 34] for extensions). While Bobkov and G¨otze argument was based on the

classical duality relations between relative entropy and log-Laplacefunctionals (recalled in Section

2.1), ours is based on a twisted duality involving the following functionals:

Lpf|Lebq:" ´logż

e

´f°dx, fPFpRnq.

and

Kpν|Lebq:"sup

fPL1pνqXFpRnq" p´fqdν´Lpf|Lebq* , νPP1pRnq.

A simple calculation shows that

Kpν|Lebq " ´infηPP1pRnqtTpν,ηq `Hpη|Lebqu.

To see that IS

npcqimplies (10), observe that for all functionfPFpRnqsuch that 0ăşe´fdxand

0ăşe´f°dxandν1,ν2PP2pRnq, it holdsż

´f dν1`logż

e

´f°dx`ż

´f°dν2`logż

e

´fdxěnlogc´ˆ

f dν

1`ż

f

°dν2

Bounding the left hand side byKpν1|Lebq`Kpν2|Lebq, one sees that (10) follows (up to technicalities)

by optimizing overfand using the dual Kantorovich formula

Tpν1,ν2q "inffPFpRnqż

f dν

1`ż

f

°dν2.

Let us give an idea of the proof of the converse implication. As observed by Cordero-Erausquin and Klartag [16], a remarkable consequence of the Prekopa-Leindler inequality is that the functional Lp¨|Lebqis convex onFpRnq(see the proof of Lemma 1 where this simple argument is recalled). The above functionals will be shown in Theorem 3 to be in convex duality(see Section 5 for precise statements about this duality), in the sense that the functionalLp¨|Lebqcan be recovered from the functionalKp¨|Lebqas follows:

Lpf|Lebq "sup

νPP1pRnq"

p´fqdν´Kpν|Lebq*

for allfPFpRnqsuch thatşe´f°dxą0. This reverse relation is the key to complete the equivalence

between IS npcqand (10). To further analyze the inequality (10), we will make use of the remarkable characterization of moment measures recently obtained by Cordero-Erausquin and Klartag [16] (building on earlier works THE DEFICIT IN THE GAUSSIAN LOG-SOBOLEV INEQUALITY AND INVERSE SANTAL´O INEQUALITIES 7

[68, 19, 6, 47])) and revisited by Santambrogio [62]. As shown in [16, 62], for a givenνPP1pRnqthe

quantity inf

ηPP1pRnqtTpν,ηq `Hpη|Lebquis not´8if and only ifνis centered and its support is not

contained in a hyperplane (for completeness the proof of "the onlyif" case is sketched in the proof

of Proposition 4). In this case, the optimalηturns out to be a log-concave probability measure with

a density of the forme´V, whereVPFpRnqis an essentially smooth convex function andνis the moment measure ofη. The converse is also true: ifνis the moment measure of a given log-concave

probability measureηowith a regular density as above, then the functionηÞÑTpν,ηq `Hpη|Lebq

reaches its infimum atηo. Let us mention that the notion of moment measures together withthe above characterization recently found several applications in convex geometry [41, 42], probability

theory [22, 44] or functional inequalities [25]. Here, we will use this description of moment measures

to reparametrize the inequality (10) in terms ofη1,η2instead ofν1,ν2, yielding to the following

equivalent statement: for all log-concave probability measuresη1,η2with an essentially continuous

log-density, it holds

whereν1,ν2are the moment measures ofη1,η2. This last inequality formulated with respect to

the Lebesgue measure can then easily be recasted in terms of the Gaussian measureγnyielding in particular to Theorem 1. Let us further comment the Entropy-Transport inequality (11).It turns out that (11) also admits an information theoretic formulation. Recall that the entropy power of a random vectorXwith law

ηonRnis defined as

(12)NpXq "1

2πeexpˆ

´2nHpη|Lebq

With the notation above, one can easily prove (see Corollary 4) usinga simple homogeneity argument that (11) is equivalent to (13)NpX1qNpX2qTpν1,ν2q2ě´nc

2π¯

2, for random vectorsX1,X2having log concave distributionsη1,η2with full support and associated

moments measuresν1,ν2. Let us note that ifX1d"X2, thenTpν1,ν1q "ş|?V1|2dη1:"IpX1qis the

Fisher information ofη1. Indeed, the optimal coupling inTpν1,ν1qispY1,Y1qwithY1"ν1so that

Tpν1,ν1q "ż

|x|2ν1pdxq "ż |?V1pxq|2η1pdxq

So, in this case, (13) boils down to

NpX1qIpX1q ěnc

2π.

A well known result of Stam [64] shows that the best constant in theinequality above isc"2π(for general random vectorsX1). Inequality (13) thus appears as some bivariate form of Stam"s inequality for log-concave random vectors. Before closing this introduction, let us point out that the results obtained in the present paper

for reverse Santal´o inequalities echo several preceding results developed in the framework of direct

Santal´o inequalities. As proved by Ball in [4] in the case of even functions and then extended by

Artstein-Avidan, Klartag and Milman [2] and Fradelizi and Meyer [27], the direct Santal´o inequality

admits the following equivalent functional form: for any measurablefunctionf:RnÑRY t`8u, there existsaPRnsuch that (14)ż e

´fadxż

e

8NATHAEL GOZLAN

wherefapxq "fpx`aq,xPRn. Whenfis even,acan be chosen to be 0. Direct proofs of this functional version were then obtained by Lehec [48, 49, 50]. The functional inequality (14)

immediately gives back the convex body version (1), but it is also interesting in itself. Let us mention

two recent applications of the inequality (14) that are of the same spirit as our main contributions.

It was shown by Caglar, Fradelizi, Gu´edon, Lehec, Sch¨utt and Werner [14] that the inequality (14)

implies back some inverse logarithmic Sobolev inequality first obtained by Artstein-Avidan, Klartag,

Sch¨utt and Werner [3]. More recently [21], Fathi showed that the inequality (14) is in fact equivalent

to some sharp symmetrized form of the Talagrand transport costinequality (see Section 3.2 for more details). These symmetrized forms of Talagrand transport inequalities were further studied by Tsuji

in [66] (with in particular a direct transport proof of this sharp transport inequality in dimension 1).

Finally, the inequality (13) is reminiscent of a work by Lutwak, Yang and Zhang [51] identifying thequotesdbs_dbs1.pdfusesText_1
[PDF] investir 2269

[PDF] investir 2275

[PDF] investir n°2278

[PDF] investir n°2279

[PDF] invitation benoit lavoie 2016

[PDF] invitation cote du sud 2017

[PDF] invite de commande windows 7 pdf

[PDF] invnorm ti 82

[PDF] inwi

[PDF] inwi *1

[PDF] inwi *3

[PDF] inwi site officiel

[PDF] io 1945 eps

[PDF] io 1967 eps

[PDF] ion ascorbate