[PDF] [PDF] Transatlantic airline fuel efficiency ranking, 2017 - International

9 sept 2018 · Ireland BA flew more than half of its departures on inefficient Boeing 747 and Airbus A380 aircraft, leading to an average aircraft fuel burn 8 



Previous PDF Next PDF





[PDF] Transatlantic airline fuel efficiency ranking, 2017 - International

9 sept 2018 · Ireland BA flew more than half of its departures on inefficient Boeing 747 and Airbus A380 aircraft, leading to an average aircraft fuel burn 8 



[PDF] Fuel efficiency - Transport & Environment

analyses of aircraft fuel efficiency, it can be concluded that the last piston- The Airbus A380 based on the 12 reduction with respect to the B747-400, cited by



[PDF] Aircraft Fuel Consumption - HAW Hamburg

13 déc 2017 · In order to demonstrate the growing efficiency of new aircrafts, a comparison between the 1980s built Boeing 747-200B, with the 2005 introduced 



[PDF] Fact Sheet More Efficient, Greener and Quieter Aircraft - Sustainable

While air freight remains the least fuel efficient mode of transport it is a vital service to dominated by older Boeing models such as the 747-400F newer, more efficient While not a dedicated freight aircraft, the Airbus A380, the world's largest 



[PDF] Flying more efficiently: Joint impacts of fuel prices, capital costs and

We investigate the factors that affect airlines' choice of fleet fuel economy using plane- level data for capital costs and fleet size on airline fleet fuel economy, CCEP Working Paper 1810, BOEING 747 100 423 Aircraft Version: A380



[PDF] Approaches to Representing Aircraft Fuel Efficiency - CORE

parameters measures the fuel efficiency performance of the aircraft at a single body transport aircraft like the Airbus A380 with 500+ seats, as seen in Figure 4 B747-2 B747-4 B747-3 B747-1 B747-SR >1000km >1000km



[PDF] A380 Special edition - Airbus

We at Airbus firmly believe the A380 is a cost-effective and versatile revenue than on its B747s Beyond the improvement in efficiency, freeing up a valuable slot (electricity, air, water fuel, passenger and cargo handling, towing ) • Rescue 



[PDF] ICCAIA presentation - ICAO

23 août 2008 · Figure 9-3: Trend in transport aircraft fuel efficiency A380-800 - 1,000pax • Range: To test this year on a Boeing 747 using jatropha oil



[PDF] Air Transport and Energy Efficiency - Pubdocsworldbankorg

Figure 1 - Fuel Efficiency Gains Since the Early Jet Age Figure 31 - The Boeing 747-8 uses advanced technologies to improve environmental impact (16 February 2008, an Airbus A380 conducted the first test flight of a commercial



[PDF] the 2 1 stcenturyjetliner - Tobias Baldauf

AIRBUS A380 - the 21st century jetliner - 1 - AIRBUS t h e 2 1 A380 burns 12 less fuel than Boing 747, which makes it a “highly efficient aircraft” 2 An effect

[PDF] a380 vs b747 8i

[PDF] a380 vs boeing 747 800

[PDF] a380 weight

[PDF] a380 weight fully loaded kg

[PDF] a380 wing dimensions

[PDF] a86 duplex tunnel paris

[PDF] a86 ouest tunnel paris france

[PDF] a86 paris tunnel height

[PDF] a86 tunnel under paris

[PDF] a86 west tunnel paris

[PDF] a86 west tunnel paris france

[PDF] aa 20 questions test

[PDF] aa accounts

[PDF] aa annual report 2018

[PDF] aa benefits

SEPTEMBER 2018WHITE PAPER

Brandon Graver, Ph.D., and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON The authors thank Tim Johnson, Andrew Murphy, Anastasia Kharina, and Amy Smorodin for their review and support. We also acknowledge Airline Data Inc. for providing processed BTS data, and FlightGlobal for Ascend Fleet data.

International Council on Clean Transportation

1225 I Street NW Suite 900

Washington, DC 20005 USA

communications@theicct.org www.theicct.org @TheICCT © 2018 International Council on Clean Transportation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

....................................iii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 2. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................ 3. RESULTS ........................................................................ 4. CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS ........................................................................ ..........20 5. REFERENCES ........................................................................

APPENDIX A: MODEL VALIDATION

..............26 APPENDIX B: ADJUSTED 2014 TRANSATLANTIC FUEL EFFICIENCY ............................27

WHITE PAPER

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.

Table 2.

Table 3.

Table 4.

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure ES-1.

Figure ES-2.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure A-1.

Figure B-1.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

27British Airways

30Lufthansa

31United

33AeroRot

33Alitalia

33Aer Lingus

33Austrian

33American

34Scandinavian

34Delta

34Iberia

34Icelandair

35Virgin Atlantic

35Thomas Cook

35Air France

35Turkish

36KLM

37SWISS

39WOW air

44Norwegian

Excess

Fuel/pax-km

+ 13% - + 19% + 22% + 26% + 26% + 26% + 26% + 29% + 29% + 29% + 29% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 42% + 47% + 63%

INDUSTRY AVERAGE

Average Fuel Economy [pax-km/L]

Figure ES-1.

WHITE PAPER

30%39%20%

33%

35%11%15%

17% 0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

20142017

Freight Shar

e

Passenger Load Factor

Seating Densit

y

Aircraft Fuel Burn

Figure ES-2.

WHITE PAPER

1.

INTRODUCTION

2.

METHODOLOGY

2.1

AIRLINE SELECTION

Table 1.

AirlineFlights

performedAverage ight length (km)Share of

ASKsShare of

ATKsMost prevalent

aircraft

Aer Lingus

Aeroot

Air France

Alitalia

American

Austrian

British Airways

Delta

Iberia

Icelandair

KLM

Lufthansa

Norwegian

Scandinavian

continued

WHITE PAPER

AirlineFlights

performedAverage ight length (km)Share of

ASKsShare of

ATKsMost prevalent

aircraft SWISS

Thomas Cook

Turkish

United

Virgin Atlantic

WOW air

Total280,4977,028100%100%Airbus A330-300

Note: ASK = Available seat kilometers. ATK = Available tonne kilometers. Source: Airline Data Inc. (2018)

Table 2.

AircraftMTOM

(tonnes)Typical seating capacityCargo capacity (m 3 )Number of engines, max. thrustRange (km)

Airbus A318

Boeing 737-700

Boeing 737-800

Boeing 737 MAX-8

Airbus A321

Boeing 767-300ER

Boeing 767-400ER

Boeing 787-8

Airbus A330-200

Airbus A330-300

Boeing 787-9

Boeing 757-200

Boeing 757-300

Airbus A340-300

Airbus A350-900

Boeing 777-200ER

Boeing 777-300ER

Airbus A340-600

Boeing 747-400

Boeing 747-8I

Airbus A380-800

Note: MTOM = maximum takeo mass. Sources: Airbus (2017); Airbus (2018); Boeing (1999); Boeing (2008);

Boeing (2010); Boeing (2011); Boeing (n.d.)

2.2

FUEL BURN MODELING

Table 3.

TypeVariableSources

Airline scheduled ights

Airline-specic aircraft

parameters

Aircraft weights

Aircraft fuel burn

Other operational variables

WHITE PAPER

payload kg seats departures load factor pax 100kg
pax freight kg departures

Operations Specication B043

2.3

FUEL EFFICIENCY CALCULATION

a i fuel L a fl fuel L a,i departures a,i pax km/L a fl i payload kg a,i distance[km] a,i fuel L a

100kg/pax

3.

RESULTS

3.1

AIRLINE COMPARISONS

27British Airways

30Lufthansa

31United

33Aeroflot

33Alitalia

33Aer Lingus

33Austrian

33American

34Scandinavian

34Delta

34Iberia

34Icelandair

35Virgin Atlantic

35Thomas Cook

35Air France

35Turkish

36KLM

37SWISS

39WOW air

44Norwegian

Excess

Fuel/pax-km

+ 13%— + 19% + 22% + 26% + 26% + 26% + 26% + 29% + 29% + 29% + 29% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 42% + 47% + 63%

INDUSTRY AVERAGE

Average Fuel Economy [pax-km/L]

Figure 1.

WHITE PAPER

3.2

AIRCRAFT-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS

0510152025303540

45

0100200300400500600

Average Fuel Eciency [pax-km/L]

Maximum Takeo Mass [tonnes]

A318 (32 seats)A380-800

B747-8

I

B747-400A340-600

B737-800B737 MAX-8

A321

B767-300ER

B767-400ER

B787-

8B787-9A350-900

quotesdbs_dbs14.pdfusesText_20