Historical development of comparative law
The expression comparative law is a modern one, first used in the 19th century when it became clear that the comparison of legal institutions deserved a systematic approach, in order to increase understanding of foreign cultures and to further legal progress.
From early times, however, certain scholars and researchers have made use of the comparati.
Microcomparison demands no particular preparation.
The specialist in one national system is usually qualified to study those of various other countries of the same general family.
His chief need is access to bibliographical material.
In the United States, each state has its own statutes and, to some purposes, its own common law.
Thus, the American .
comparative law, examination of comparative legal systems and of the relationships of the law to the social sciences.
Role of judges
Such contempt was not characteristic of the attitude of the judges and lawyers whose duty it was to administer justice, mainly by applying the customary law.
Their material contained areas of uncertainty and required adaptation to social needs.
In the work of ascertaining the content of a custom, and in the task of filling the gaps of customs, judg.
What are the two types of Comparative Legal Studies?
In general, comparative legal studies can be divided into two main groups:macro-level comparison and micro-level comparison.
While the former represents the comparison of two or more legal systems as a whole, the latter describes the analysis of a specific legal issue and how it is treated in two or more legal systems.
What is comparative politics?
Comparative politics, thus, deals in part with subjects similar to those that occupy comparative constitutional law, but generally has a different epistemological interest, which is not focused on norms.
For this reason, it has developed other research methods which are much more exact, but also much more restrictive, than those of comparative law.