Comparaison des paysages forestiers actuels et des paysages
4.1 Régionalisation de la forêt boréale selon la proportion de forêts de plus de 100 ans . 8.0) a par la suite conduit à la définition du paysage.
Impact de lorganisation des soins en néonatalogie :
La régionalisation des soins périnataux a débuté dans les années 70 Les analyses ont été effectuées avec le logiciel R
Contamination of Wheat Cultivated in Various Regions of Poland
1 févr. 2019 Regionalisation of various strains of F. graminearum is common e.g.
Small anthropogenic landforms from past charcoal production
26 juil. 2022 was performed at an alpha of 0.05 in Minitab Version 19 (Minitab 19 ... regionalisation by means of terrain analysis and process ...
Small anthropogenic landforms from past charcoal production
26 juil. 2022 was performed at an alpha of 0.05 in Minitab Version 19 (Minitab 19 ... regionalisation by means of terrain analysis and process ...
Sydney Zoo SSD 7228 Environmental Impact Statement
12 juil. 2015 4th Edition 2004
Journal International Sciences et Techniques de lEau et de l
1 avr. 2018 [11] Vilaginés R. Eau
Le risque en agriculture
Une version réduite et actualisée du même auteur et parue en 1984 : Que sais-je? n° doute nécessaire la régionalisation de l'analyse. ... 8.0 A - 11.9.C.
Mise en page
Statistique sur la régionalisation des débits de crues pour la Blies [4] Le logiciel WspWin (version 8.0) a été utilisé pour les calculs hydrauliques.
KINGS PARK METAL RECOVERY AND RECYCLING FACILITY
17 sept. 2020 assessed using SIDRA Intersection version 8.0 a computer-based ... Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia (IBRA) Bioregion.
Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Specifications
Changes from 8 0 to 8 0a • Table of Contents • Acknowledgement • Outpatient Delivery Settings • Measure Information Forms (MIFs) • Surgery Measure Set • OP-15 • OP-31 • OP-32 • Data Dictionary • Population and Sampling Specifications • Hospital Outpatient Department Quality Measure Data Transmission • Appendices
December 2015 15247
Sydney Zoo SSD 7228
Environmental Impact Statement
Sydney Zoo
Bungarribee Park (Western Sydney Parklands)
Submitted to the Department of Environment and Planning on behalf of Syd ney ZooJBA Urban Planning Consultants Pty Ltd ABN 84 060 735 104 / North Sydney t +61 2 9956 6962 w jbaurban.com.au
Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without prior written permission of JBA Urban Planning ConsultantsPty Ltd.
JBA operates under a Quality Management System that has been certified as complying with ISO 9001:2008. This report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with that system. If the report is not signed below, it is a preliminary draft.This report has been prepared by
Tim Ward and Christopher Curtis:
7/12/2015
This report has been reviewed by
Julie Bindon:
7/12/2015
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015Contents
JBA " 15247 i
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Overview of the Project 1
1.2 Background to the Project 2
1.3 Objectives of the Project 2
1.4 Structure of this Report 2
1.5 Project Team 3
1.6 O][j]lYjq¿k =fnajgfe]flYT 9kk]kke]fl J]imaj]e]flk 3
2.0 Site Analysis 8
2.1 Site Location and Context 8
2.2 Land Ownership and Legal Description 8
2.3 Site Description 9
2.4 Bungarribee Precinct Parklands 11
2.5 Surrounding Development 14
3.0 Description of the Project 17
3.1 Project Design Principles 19
3.2 Numerical Overview 19
3.3 Site Preparation / Bulk Earthworks 20
3.4 Built Form 20
3.5 Landscaping Elements 26
3.6 Access and Accessibility 27
3.7 Vehicular Access and Parking 28
3.8 Environmentally Sustainable Development 28
3.9 Infrastructure and Services 29
3.10 Subdivision 30
3.11 Construction Sequencing 30
3.12 Zoo Operations 31
3.13 Contributions 34
3.14 Analysis of Alternatives 34
4.0 Consultation 37
4.1 Sydney Zoo Communications and Stakeholder Consultation 37
4.2 O][j]lYjq¿k =fnajgfe]flYT 9kk]kke]fl Requirements Consultation 40
5.0 Statutory and Strategic Context 51
5.1 Legislation 51
5.2 Environmental Planning Instruments 53
5.3 Strategic Planning 55
6.0 Environmental Assessment 57
6.1 Air and Odour 57
6.2 Noise 64
6.3 Traffic, Parking and Access 73
6.4 Water, Drainage and Stormwater 80
6.5 Aboriginal Heritage 87
6.6 Non-Aboriginal Heritage 91
6.7 Waste Management 93
6.8 Landscape Character and Visual Impact 99
6.9 Contamination 104
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015Contents
ii JBA " 152476.10 Vegetation and Biodiversity 104
6.11 Bushfire Management 109
6.12 Hazards and Risk 110
6.13 Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) 117
6.14 Socio-economic Impacts 119
7.0 Environmental Risk Assessment 122
8.0 Mitigation Measures 126
9.0 Justification of the Proposal 137
9.1 Social and Economic 137
9.2 Biophysical 137
9.3 Ecologically Sustainable Development 138
10.0 Conclusion 140
11.0 Acronyms and Abbreviations 141
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015Contents
JBA " 15247 iii
Figures
1 The subject site (shown in red) is adjacent to the Great Western Highway 8 2 The site is situated within the Western Sydney Parklands 9 3 Looking north across the site towards the Bungarribee residential area 10 4 Looking south across the site towards the Bungarribee Industrial Estate 11 5 Looking west across the site towards Eastern Creek 11 6 Bungarribee Super Park Master Plan identifies the tourism hub site 13 7 Surrounding major tourism and recreational facilities 16 8The proposed masterplan for the Sydney Zoo 18
9The proposed entry and retail building 21
10 The Boma (restaurant) within the Zoo grounds looking north-west through the Zoo 22 11 The proposed administration, curatorial and veterinarian building 23 12 The proposed reptile and insect habitat buildings 24 13 The proposed reptile and insect habitat buildings will be merged into the landscape 24 14Zoo Concept 1 35
15Zoo Concept 2 35
16Zoo Concept 3 36
17Surrounding sensitive air quality receptors 59
18 Predicted maximum 24 hour average PM10 concentrations 62 19 Predicted 99th percentile peak odour concentrations 63 20 Noise monitoring locations and sensitive receivers 67 21Noise level contours (calm metrological conditions) 70 22
Noise level contours (adverse metrological conditions) 70 23
Two identified PAD sites are located within the Zoo footprint 88 24
Risk Assessment Matrix 122
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015Contents
iv JBA " 15247Tables
1Project team 3
2 O][j]lYjq¿k =fnajgfe]flYT 9kk]kke]fl J]imaj]e]flk 4 3Key development information 19
4Back-of-house building breakdown 25
5Daily estimated visitation profile 31
6Public authorities SEARs requested information 40
7 Impact assessment criteria º complex mixtures of odorous pollutants 58 8 Impact assessment criteria º dust and particulate matter 58 9Nearby sensitive receptors to the Zoo site 59
10PM10 Monitoring Results for Prospect 59
11PM2.5 Monitoring Results for Prospect 60
12Estimated dust and particulate emissions 60
13Predicted construction TSP levels 61
14Predicted construction PM10 levels 61
15Predicted construction PM2.5 levels 62
16Predicted construction deposited dust levels 62
17 Predicted 99th percentile peak odour concentrations 63 18 Air quality and odour safeguards and management measures 63 19Project specific noise levels 65
20Sleep disturbance screening levels 65
21ICNG noise management levels for residential receivers 66 22
Project specific NMLs 66
23Existing ambient noise levels 67
24Predicted construction noise levels 68
25Predicted noise levels during opening hours 69
26Predicted noise levels after hours 69
27Cumulative industrial noise levels 71
28Predicted noise levels of roaring lions at sensitive receivers 71 29
Predicted road traffic noise levels 71
30Noise and vibration safeguards and management measures 72 31
SIDRA Level of Service Criteria 74
32Existing Operating Conditions 74
33Sydney Zoo Daily Visitation Profile 75
34Vehicle occupancy estimate 76
35Visitor Parking Demand 76
36Traffic Generation Summary 77
37Post-Development Operating Conditions 78
38Post-Development Site Peak Hourly Traffic Operating Conditions 78 39
Traffic, parking and access safeguards and management measures 79 40
Stormwater re-use demands 81
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015Contents
JBA " 15247 v
41 Pollution Reduction Targets 82
42Pollution reduction results 82
43OSD 1 peak site discharge 83
44OSD 2 peak site discharge 83
45OSD 3 peak site discharge 84
46Estimated cut and fill volumes 85
47Water, drainage and stormwater safeguards and management measures 85 48
Archaeological Significance Assessment 89
49Summary of impacts to identified Aboriginal items and PAD areas 89 50
Aboriginal heritage safeguards and management measures 90 51
Existing heritage items within the general area 92 52
Non-Aboriginal heritage safeguards and management measures 92 53
Potential construction waste generation classifications 94 54
Potential operation waste generation classifications 96 55
Estimated operational waste generation rates for average visitation periods 97 56
Estimated operational waste generation rates for peak visitation periods 97 57
Estimated peak public place waste generation 98
58Waste management safeguards and management measures 98 59
SEPP 64 Signage Assessment Criteria 101
60Landscape character and visual impact safeguards and management measures 103 61
Vegetation and biodiversity safeguards and management measures 107 62
Risk Assessment 109
63Bushfire safeguards and management measures 110
64Hazardous materials screening analyses 111
65Construction hazard identification and consequence assessment 113 66
Hazards and risks safeguards and management measures 115 67
Estimated construction emissions 118
68Ecologically sustainable development safeguards and management measures 119 69
Environmental risk assessment 123
70Summary of site specific environmental safeguards and management measures 127
Appendices
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015Contents
vi JBA " 15247 A Consideration of Clause 228 Factors and Matters of NationalSignificance
JBA BLandscape Master Plan
Aspect Studios
CArchitectural Drawings
Misho + Associates
DDepartment of Planning and Environment
ETransport and Traffic Impact Assessment
GTA Consulting
FCivil Engineering Plans
Lindsay Dynan
GCivil and Stormwater Report
Lindsay Dynan
HContamination Report
Consulting Earth Scientists
IBiodiversity Report
Eco Logical Australia
JBushfire Risk Assessment
Eco Logical Australia
KMechanical Engineering
Evolved Engineering
LNon-Aboriginal Statement of Heritage Impact
Artefact
MAboriginal Archaeological Survey Report
Artefact
NNoise and Vibration Impact Assessment
Wilkinson Murray
OAir Quality Impact Assessment
Wilkinson Murray
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015Contents
JBA " 15247 vii
PEnergy Efficiency and ESD Report
SLR Consulting
QWaste Management Plan
SLR Consulting
RGreenhouse Gas Assessment Report
Wilkinson Murray
S Contribution of the Sydney Zoo to the Economy of NSW KPMG TLighting Concept Report
LAS Consultants
USignage Management Plan
Urban and Public
VProtected Matters Search Results
WSurrounding Development Map
JBA XBCA and Accessibility Report
BCA Logic
Y Sydney Zoo Signage Policy and WSPT ResponsibilitiesWSPT, Sydney Zoo
ZProposed Plan of Subdivision
Vince Morgan Surveyors
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015JBA " 15247 i
Statement of Validity
Development Application Details
Applicant name Sydney Zoo
Applicant address C/- Sturt Capital Partners, Level 6, 1 Alfred Street,Sydney
Land to be developed Lot 101 on DP1195067
Proposed development A zoological facility as described in Section 3.0 of this Environmental Impact StatementPrepared by
Name Tim Ward Christopher Curtis
Qualifications BSC(Hons)
MEnvMgt
BUrbanEnvPlan (Hons)
Address Level 7, 77 Berry Street, North Sydney
In respect of State Significant Development - DevelopmentApplication
Certification
I certify that I have prepared the content of this EIS and to the best of my knowledge: it is in accordance with Schedule 2 of the
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation
2000; all available information that is relevant to the environmental assessment of the development to which the statement relates; and the information contained in the statement is neither false nor misleading.
Signature
Name Tim Ward Christopher Curtis
Date 7/12/2015 7/12/2015
Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015 ii JBA " 15247Executive Summary
Purpose of this Report
This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment (the Department) as part of a Development Application under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP& A Act). It relates to a proposal for a new zoological facility situated within theWestern Sydney Parklands (Sydney Zoo).
Development within the Western Parklands with a capital investment value of more than $10 million is State Significant Development (SSD) for the purposes of the EP&A Act. As the proposed development will have a capital investment value of $28 million it is SSD. A request for the issue of O][j]lYjq¿k =fnajgfe]flYT 9kk]kke]fl J]imaj]e]flk (SEARs) was sought on 14 August 2015. Accordingly, the SEARs were issued on16 September 2015F L`ak kmReakkagf ak af Y[[gj\Yf[] oal` l`] K]UYjle]fl¿k
guidelines for SSD applications lodged under Part 4 of the EP&A Act, and addresses the issues raised in the SEARs.Overview of the Project
The Development Application (DA) seeks approval for the following key components of the Sydney Zoo: Animal exhibits across several enclosures of varying design for a range of native and exotic animals;Back-of-house buildings for exhibits;
Main entrance building comprising entry/exit, and gift shop;Restaurant and café;
Kiosks and amenities;
Show arena;
Picnic areas and gardens;
Wetlands and waterways;
Service building containing:
Administration areas;
Curatorial and food preparation areas; and
Veterinarian space.
Signage;
Service yard with maintenance shelter;
Internal services and utilities to support the Zoo, including water, sewer, electricity and telecommunications; Main car park for approximately 475 vehicles, with an overflow car park for approximately 840 vehicles (accessed via an internal road connecting to theGreat Western Highway);
Bus and coach parking;
Subdivision; and
Landscaping of the site associated with all of the above. Sydney Zoo " Environmental Impact Statement | December 2015JBA " 15247 iii
The Site
The site is located approximately 33 kilometres west of the Sydney Central Business District and approximately 15 kilometres east of Penrith. It falls within the Western Sydney Parklands, and is in close proximity to the Great Western Highway, M4 Western Motorway and Westlink M7, providing excellent access to both the state and regional road network and surrounding parkland areas. The site is part of the lot legally described as Proposed Lot 11 in Lot 101 on DP1195067 (subject to subdivision as part of this SSD application), and is owned by the Western Sydney Parklands Trust. The site of the proposed Zoo is 16.5ha in size, and irregular in shape. Access will be from the Great Western Highway approximately 75m from its southern border.Planning Context
Section 5 of the EIS considers all applicable legislation in detail. The proposal is consistent with the requirements of all relevant State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs). Under the Western Sydney Parklands SEPP the land is unzoned. This allows for all development to be either permissible with development consent or permissible without development consent. Development that is proposed by anyone other than a public authority requires development consent. As the proponent is not a public authority, development consent is required under theEP&A Act.
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
This EIS provides an assessment of the environmental impacts of the project in accordance with the SEARs and sets out the undertakings made by Sydney Zoo to manage and minimise potential impacts arising from the development.Air quality and odour
The proposed Zoo may have impacts on air quality during construction, from activities associated with the bulk earthworks phase which is anticipated to last for between three and four months. Appropriate construction management measures will be implemented to minimise these impacts on the nearby sensitive receivers. Odour stemming from the composting and storage of organic waste has been assessed and determined to pose a negligible impact on neighbouring receptors. Appropriate management measures will be incorporated into the operational phase of the Zoo.Noise and vibration
There are potential impacts resulting from construction of the proposed Zoo which may affect nearby sensitive receivers during the main bulk earthworks phase. Additionally, noise impacts associated with the construction period, and the operational period, particularly related to sleep disturbance from roaring lions, has been assessed which indicates that there will be negligible impact on neighbouring residential properties due to the separation distances provided by the buffer of the wider Western Sydney Parklands.quotesdbs_dbs42.pdfusesText_42[PDF] Contribution du Département de la Seine-Saint-Denis au Contrat de Plan Régional de Développement des Formations Professionnelles
[PDF] Les bacheliers 2004 inscrits à l'université de Franche-Comté : Suivi sur 3 ans
[PDF] 74. Chargé/chargée de cours techniques et de pratique professionnelle(ctpp)* B. Dans l'enseignement secondaire du degré supérieur
[PDF] CENTRE DE GESTION AGREE ORNAIS
[PDF] Ma journée : mode d emploi
[PDF] Pour verser votre taxe, nous sommes à vos côtés et simplifions votre démarche : Vous calculez en ligne le montant de votre taxe d apprentissage
[PDF] Un pour tous. tous pour un!
[PDF] - Aux Chefs des établissements d enseignement organisé par la Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles ;
[PDF] VADEMECUM SUR LA TAXE D APPRENTISSAGE
[PDF] Assemblée de quartier Joliot-Curie
[PDF] CHL AUDIT GESTION FINANCES
[PDF] Les mesures gouvernementales mettent en péril le secteur Non Marchand
[PDF] Phase 2. Diagnostic actualisé des besoins et de l offre Orientations en vue de l élaboration du 3 ème PDALHPD ELABORATION DU 3EME PLAN DEPARTEMENTAL
[PDF] RAWAJ Plan d Action 2008-2012